Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?

Invasive predators can impose strong selection pressure on species that evolved in their absence and drive species to extinction. Interactions between coexisting predators may be particularly strong, as larger predators frequently kill smaller predators and suppress their abundances. Until 3500 year...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mike Letnic, Melanie Fillios, Mathew S Crowther
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/70d403b0727d4676a8efedaa83118a82
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:70d403b0727d4676a8efedaa83118a82
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:70d403b0727d4676a8efedaa83118a822021-11-18T07:19:59ZCould direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0034877https://doaj.org/article/70d403b0727d4676a8efedaa83118a822012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22567093/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Invasive predators can impose strong selection pressure on species that evolved in their absence and drive species to extinction. Interactions between coexisting predators may be particularly strong, as larger predators frequently kill smaller predators and suppress their abundances. Until 3500 years ago the marsupial thylacine was Australia's largest predator. It became extinct from the mainland soon after the arrival of a morphologically convergent placental predator, the dingo, but persisted in the absence of dingoes on the island of Tasmania until the 20th century. As Tasmanian thylacines were larger than dingoes, it has been argued that dingoes were unlikely to have caused the extinction of mainland thylacines because larger predators are rarely killed by smaller predators. By comparing Holocene specimens from the same regions of mainland Australia, we show that dingoes were similarly sized to male thylacines but considerably larger than female thylacines. Female thylacines would have been vulnerable to killing by dingoes. Such killing could have depressed the reproductive output of thylacine populations. Our results support the hypothesis that direct killing by larger dingoes drove thylacines to extinction on mainland Australia. However, attributing the extinction of the thylacine to just one cause is problematic because the arrival of dingoes coincided with another the potential extinction driver, the intensification of the human economy.Mike LetnicMelanie FilliosMathew S CrowtherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 5, p e34877 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Mike Letnic
Melanie Fillios
Mathew S Crowther
Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?
description Invasive predators can impose strong selection pressure on species that evolved in their absence and drive species to extinction. Interactions between coexisting predators may be particularly strong, as larger predators frequently kill smaller predators and suppress their abundances. Until 3500 years ago the marsupial thylacine was Australia's largest predator. It became extinct from the mainland soon after the arrival of a morphologically convergent placental predator, the dingo, but persisted in the absence of dingoes on the island of Tasmania until the 20th century. As Tasmanian thylacines were larger than dingoes, it has been argued that dingoes were unlikely to have caused the extinction of mainland thylacines because larger predators are rarely killed by smaller predators. By comparing Holocene specimens from the same regions of mainland Australia, we show that dingoes were similarly sized to male thylacines but considerably larger than female thylacines. Female thylacines would have been vulnerable to killing by dingoes. Such killing could have depressed the reproductive output of thylacine populations. Our results support the hypothesis that direct killing by larger dingoes drove thylacines to extinction on mainland Australia. However, attributing the extinction of the thylacine to just one cause is problematic because the arrival of dingoes coincided with another the potential extinction driver, the intensification of the human economy.
format article
author Mike Letnic
Melanie Fillios
Mathew S Crowther
author_facet Mike Letnic
Melanie Fillios
Mathew S Crowther
author_sort Mike Letnic
title Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?
title_short Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?
title_full Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?
title_fullStr Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?
title_full_unstemmed Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?
title_sort could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland australia?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/70d403b0727d4676a8efedaa83118a82
work_keys_str_mv AT mikeletnic coulddirectkillingbylargerdingoeshavecausedtheextinctionofthethylacinefrommainlandaustralia
AT melaniefillios coulddirectkillingbylargerdingoeshavecausedtheextinctionofthethylacinefrommainlandaustralia
AT mathewscrowther coulddirectkillingbylargerdingoeshavecausedtheextinctionofthethylacinefrommainlandaustralia
_version_ 1718423603879346176