Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients

Abstract Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different po...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getachew Tesfaye Beyene, Fekadu Alemu, Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede, Dawit Hailu Alemayehu, Tamirayehu Seyoum, Dessalegn Abeje Tefera, Gebeyehu Assefa, Abebech Tesfaye, Anteneh Habte, Gadissa Bedada, Birhanemeskel Tegene, Melese Yeshambaw, Liya Wassie, Adane Mihret, Alemseged Abdissa, Andargachew Mulu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d2021-11-28T12:16:21ZSaliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients10.1038/s41598-021-02097-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02097-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different populations and settings are limited. Here, we showed that saliva could be a good alternative sample to diagnose COVID-19 patients. Pair of NPS-saliva samples was collected from 152 symptomatic; confirmed COVID-19 patients, and compared their positivity rate, viral load, and duration of viral shedding. From 152 patients, 80 (52.63%) tested positive and 72 (47.37%) were negative for SARSA-CoV2 in NPS sample. In saliva, 129 (92.14%) were tested positive and 11 (7.86%) were negative on the day of admission to hospital. The overall percent agreement of RT-PCR result of Saliva to NPS was 70% (196/280). A comparison of viral load from 72 NPS-saliva pair samples on day of admission shows saliva contains significantly higher viral load (P < 0.001). In conclusion, saliva has higher yield in detecting SARS-CoV2, and COVID-19 patients show higher viral load and prolonged period of viral shedding in saliva. Therefore, we recommend saliva as a better alternative sample to NPS to diagnose COVID-19 patients.Getachew Tesfaye BeyeneFekadu AlemuEyerusalem Solomon KebedeDawit Hailu AlemayehuTamirayehu SeyoumDessalegn Abeje TeferaGebeyehu AssefaAbebech TesfayeAnteneh HabteGadissa BedadaBirhanemeskel TegeneMelese YeshambawLiya WassieAdane MihretAlemseged AbdissaAndargachew MuluNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Getachew Tesfaye Beyene
Fekadu Alemu
Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede
Dawit Hailu Alemayehu
Tamirayehu Seyoum
Dessalegn Abeje Tefera
Gebeyehu Assefa
Abebech Tesfaye
Anteneh Habte
Gadissa Bedada
Birhanemeskel Tegene
Melese Yeshambaw
Liya Wassie
Adane Mihret
Alemseged Abdissa
Andargachew Mulu
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
description Abstract Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different populations and settings are limited. Here, we showed that saliva could be a good alternative sample to diagnose COVID-19 patients. Pair of NPS-saliva samples was collected from 152 symptomatic; confirmed COVID-19 patients, and compared their positivity rate, viral load, and duration of viral shedding. From 152 patients, 80 (52.63%) tested positive and 72 (47.37%) were negative for SARSA-CoV2 in NPS sample. In saliva, 129 (92.14%) were tested positive and 11 (7.86%) were negative on the day of admission to hospital. The overall percent agreement of RT-PCR result of Saliva to NPS was 70% (196/280). A comparison of viral load from 72 NPS-saliva pair samples on day of admission shows saliva contains significantly higher viral load (P < 0.001). In conclusion, saliva has higher yield in detecting SARS-CoV2, and COVID-19 patients show higher viral load and prolonged period of viral shedding in saliva. Therefore, we recommend saliva as a better alternative sample to NPS to diagnose COVID-19 patients.
format article
author Getachew Tesfaye Beyene
Fekadu Alemu
Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede
Dawit Hailu Alemayehu
Tamirayehu Seyoum
Dessalegn Abeje Tefera
Gebeyehu Assefa
Abebech Tesfaye
Anteneh Habte
Gadissa Bedada
Birhanemeskel Tegene
Melese Yeshambaw
Liya Wassie
Adane Mihret
Alemseged Abdissa
Andargachew Mulu
author_facet Getachew Tesfaye Beyene
Fekadu Alemu
Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede
Dawit Hailu Alemayehu
Tamirayehu Seyoum
Dessalegn Abeje Tefera
Gebeyehu Assefa
Abebech Tesfaye
Anteneh Habte
Gadissa Bedada
Birhanemeskel Tegene
Melese Yeshambaw
Liya Wassie
Adane Mihret
Alemseged Abdissa
Andargachew Mulu
author_sort Getachew Tesfaye Beyene
title Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
title_short Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
title_full Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
title_fullStr Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
title_full_unstemmed Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
title_sort saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting sars-cov2 in covid-19 patients
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d
work_keys_str_mv AT getachewtesfayebeyene salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT fekadualemu salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT eyerusalemsolomonkebede salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT dawithailualemayehu salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT tamirayehuseyoum salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT dessalegnabejetefera salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT gebeyehuassefa salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT abebechtesfaye salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT antenehhabte salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT gadissabedada salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT birhanemeskeltegene salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT meleseyeshambaw salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT liyawassie salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT adanemihret salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT alemsegedabdissa salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
AT andargachewmulu salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients
_version_ 1718408082470469632