Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients
Abstract Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different po...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d2021-11-28T12:16:21ZSaliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients10.1038/s41598-021-02097-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02097-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different populations and settings are limited. Here, we showed that saliva could be a good alternative sample to diagnose COVID-19 patients. Pair of NPS-saliva samples was collected from 152 symptomatic; confirmed COVID-19 patients, and compared their positivity rate, viral load, and duration of viral shedding. From 152 patients, 80 (52.63%) tested positive and 72 (47.37%) were negative for SARSA-CoV2 in NPS sample. In saliva, 129 (92.14%) were tested positive and 11 (7.86%) were negative on the day of admission to hospital. The overall percent agreement of RT-PCR result of Saliva to NPS was 70% (196/280). A comparison of viral load from 72 NPS-saliva pair samples on day of admission shows saliva contains significantly higher viral load (P < 0.001). In conclusion, saliva has higher yield in detecting SARS-CoV2, and COVID-19 patients show higher viral load and prolonged period of viral shedding in saliva. Therefore, we recommend saliva as a better alternative sample to NPS to diagnose COVID-19 patients.Getachew Tesfaye BeyeneFekadu AlemuEyerusalem Solomon KebedeDawit Hailu AlemayehuTamirayehu SeyoumDessalegn Abeje TeferaGebeyehu AssefaAbebech TesfayeAnteneh HabteGadissa BedadaBirhanemeskel TegeneMelese YeshambawLiya WassieAdane MihretAlemseged AbdissaAndargachew MuluNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Getachew Tesfaye Beyene Fekadu Alemu Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede Dawit Hailu Alemayehu Tamirayehu Seyoum Dessalegn Abeje Tefera Gebeyehu Assefa Abebech Tesfaye Anteneh Habte Gadissa Bedada Birhanemeskel Tegene Melese Yeshambaw Liya Wassie Adane Mihret Alemseged Abdissa Andargachew Mulu Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients |
description |
Abstract Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different populations and settings are limited. Here, we showed that saliva could be a good alternative sample to diagnose COVID-19 patients. Pair of NPS-saliva samples was collected from 152 symptomatic; confirmed COVID-19 patients, and compared their positivity rate, viral load, and duration of viral shedding. From 152 patients, 80 (52.63%) tested positive and 72 (47.37%) were negative for SARSA-CoV2 in NPS sample. In saliva, 129 (92.14%) were tested positive and 11 (7.86%) were negative on the day of admission to hospital. The overall percent agreement of RT-PCR result of Saliva to NPS was 70% (196/280). A comparison of viral load from 72 NPS-saliva pair samples on day of admission shows saliva contains significantly higher viral load (P < 0.001). In conclusion, saliva has higher yield in detecting SARS-CoV2, and COVID-19 patients show higher viral load and prolonged period of viral shedding in saliva. Therefore, we recommend saliva as a better alternative sample to NPS to diagnose COVID-19 patients. |
format |
article |
author |
Getachew Tesfaye Beyene Fekadu Alemu Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede Dawit Hailu Alemayehu Tamirayehu Seyoum Dessalegn Abeje Tefera Gebeyehu Assefa Abebech Tesfaye Anteneh Habte Gadissa Bedada Birhanemeskel Tegene Melese Yeshambaw Liya Wassie Adane Mihret Alemseged Abdissa Andargachew Mulu |
author_facet |
Getachew Tesfaye Beyene Fekadu Alemu Eyerusalem Solomon Kebede Dawit Hailu Alemayehu Tamirayehu Seyoum Dessalegn Abeje Tefera Gebeyehu Assefa Abebech Tesfaye Anteneh Habte Gadissa Bedada Birhanemeskel Tegene Melese Yeshambaw Liya Wassie Adane Mihret Alemseged Abdissa Andargachew Mulu |
author_sort |
Getachew Tesfaye Beyene |
title |
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients |
title_short |
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients |
title_full |
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr |
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients |
title_sort |
saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting sars-cov2 in covid-19 patients |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/70e28693b8ce4c8c95780f07ca2cbd5d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT getachewtesfayebeyene salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT fekadualemu salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT eyerusalemsolomonkebede salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT dawithailualemayehu salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT tamirayehuseyoum salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT dessalegnabejetefera salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT gebeyehuassefa salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT abebechtesfaye salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT antenehhabte salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT gadissabedada salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT birhanemeskeltegene salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT meleseyeshambaw salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT liyawassie salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT adanemihret salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT alemsegedabdissa salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients AT andargachewmulu salivaissuperiorovernasopharyngealswabfordetectingsarscov2incovid19patients |
_version_ |
1718408082470469632 |