Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors

Abstract ‘Rape mythologising’ has been found to be a reason why survivors of rape feel blamed, and might contribute to low rates of reporting or conviction. No research to date examines whether ‘rape mythologising’ occurs in the conversations of sexual health staff when discussing rape cases. Conver...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillip Brooker, Catherine Butler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Springer Nature 2021
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/70eaa26a72e64757b50d2d90838bebef
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:70eaa26a72e64757b50d2d90838bebef
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:70eaa26a72e64757b50d2d90838bebef2021-11-28T12:25:49ZRape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors10.1057/s41599-021-00964-x2662-9992https://doaj.org/article/70eaa26a72e64757b50d2d90838bebef2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00964-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2662-9992Abstract ‘Rape mythologising’ has been found to be a reason why survivors of rape feel blamed, and might contribute to low rates of reporting or conviction. No research to date examines whether ‘rape mythologising’ occurs in the conversations of sexual health staff when discussing rape cases. Conversation Analysis was used to analyse a focus group conversation between five sexual healthcare clinic staff who routinely provided support to rape survivors, on the topic of three rape cases presented at the clinic. Three forms of conversation were noted in the focus group: (1) assessing ‘relatability’ in cases, (2) diagnostically reconstructing events and (3) apportioning blame to rapists. Implications for professional training are discussed. In all three, a tension was noted between drawing on rape myths and professional non-blaming discourses. This research demonstrates the need for further training of those who work with rape survivors.Phillip BrookerCatherine ButlerSpringer NaturearticleHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesAZ20-999Social SciencesHENHumanities & Social Sciences Communications, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic History of scholarship and learning. The humanities
AZ20-999
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle History of scholarship and learning. The humanities
AZ20-999
Social Sciences
H
Phillip Brooker
Catherine Butler
Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
description Abstract ‘Rape mythologising’ has been found to be a reason why survivors of rape feel blamed, and might contribute to low rates of reporting or conviction. No research to date examines whether ‘rape mythologising’ occurs in the conversations of sexual health staff when discussing rape cases. Conversation Analysis was used to analyse a focus group conversation between five sexual healthcare clinic staff who routinely provided support to rape survivors, on the topic of three rape cases presented at the clinic. Three forms of conversation were noted in the focus group: (1) assessing ‘relatability’ in cases, (2) diagnostically reconstructing events and (3) apportioning blame to rapists. Implications for professional training are discussed. In all three, a tension was noted between drawing on rape myths and professional non-blaming discourses. This research demonstrates the need for further training of those who work with rape survivors.
format article
author Phillip Brooker
Catherine Butler
author_facet Phillip Brooker
Catherine Butler
author_sort Phillip Brooker
title Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
title_short Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
title_full Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
title_fullStr Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
title_full_unstemmed Rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
title_sort rape myths in practice: the everyday work of accounting for rape survivors
publisher Springer Nature
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/70eaa26a72e64757b50d2d90838bebef
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipbrooker rapemythsinpracticetheeverydayworkofaccountingforrapesurvivors
AT catherinebutler rapemythsinpracticetheeverydayworkofaccountingforrapesurvivors
_version_ 1718407962486112256