Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile

The Chilean socio-political explosion in October 2019 embodies a milestone in Chile’s national history, challenging the current government’s administration and the management of state resources. One of the triggering factors of this crisis was the increase in electricity prices for those clients pre...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Humberto Verdejo Fredes, Benjamin Acosta, Mauricio Olivares, Fernando García-Muñoz, Francisco Tobar, Vannia Toro, Cesar Smith, Cristhian Becker
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a32021-11-11T19:34:09ZImpact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile10.3390/su1321118702071-1050https://doaj.org/article/70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a32021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11870https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050The Chilean socio-political explosion in October 2019 embodies a milestone in Chile’s national history, challenging the current government’s administration and the management of state resources. One of the triggering factors of this crisis was the increase in electricity prices for those clients previously subject to flat pricing. As an example, in 2019, electricity fees increased by 25% at the national level. In order to solve the conflict, the Ministry of Energy proposed a mechanism, applicable for two years, which would freeze energy charges for companies, industries and domestic customers subject to a regulated tariff. This mechanism was employed and would produce a debt favoring generation companies, which could not exceed CLD 1.350 million. This article analyzes the effectiveness of the energy price stabilization mechanism and the effects of the Chilean socio-economic instability—resulting from the aggregated debt generated by the mechanism applicability—on the exchange rate over its duration of operation. The results suggest that the effects of the current law will not fulfill the purpose of tariff stabilization until 2024; additionally, there will be a sustained increase in tariffs until the year 2027.Humberto Verdejo FredesBenjamin AcostaMauricio OlivaresFernando García-MuñozFrancisco TobarVannia ToroCesar SmithCristhian BeckerMDPI AGarticleenergy pricesocio-political crisisregulated clientsEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11870, p 11870 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic energy price
socio-political crisis
regulated clients
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle energy price
socio-political crisis
regulated clients
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Humberto Verdejo Fredes
Benjamin Acosta
Mauricio Olivares
Fernando García-Muñoz
Francisco Tobar
Vannia Toro
Cesar Smith
Cristhian Becker
Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
description The Chilean socio-political explosion in October 2019 embodies a milestone in Chile’s national history, challenging the current government’s administration and the management of state resources. One of the triggering factors of this crisis was the increase in electricity prices for those clients previously subject to flat pricing. As an example, in 2019, electricity fees increased by 25% at the national level. In order to solve the conflict, the Ministry of Energy proposed a mechanism, applicable for two years, which would freeze energy charges for companies, industries and domestic customers subject to a regulated tariff. This mechanism was employed and would produce a debt favoring generation companies, which could not exceed CLD 1.350 million. This article analyzes the effectiveness of the energy price stabilization mechanism and the effects of the Chilean socio-economic instability—resulting from the aggregated debt generated by the mechanism applicability—on the exchange rate over its duration of operation. The results suggest that the effects of the current law will not fulfill the purpose of tariff stabilization until 2024; additionally, there will be a sustained increase in tariffs until the year 2027.
format article
author Humberto Verdejo Fredes
Benjamin Acosta
Mauricio Olivares
Fernando García-Muñoz
Francisco Tobar
Vannia Toro
Cesar Smith
Cristhian Becker
author_facet Humberto Verdejo Fredes
Benjamin Acosta
Mauricio Olivares
Fernando García-Muñoz
Francisco Tobar
Vannia Toro
Cesar Smith
Cristhian Becker
author_sort Humberto Verdejo Fredes
title Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
title_short Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
title_full Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
title_fullStr Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
title_sort impact of energy price stabilization mechanism on regulated clients’ tariffs: the case of chile
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a3
work_keys_str_mv AT humbertoverdejofredes impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT benjaminacosta impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT mauricioolivares impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT fernandogarciamunoz impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT franciscotobar impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT vanniatoro impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT cesarsmith impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
AT cristhianbecker impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile
_version_ 1718431472498507776