Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile
The Chilean socio-political explosion in October 2019 embodies a milestone in Chile’s national history, challenging the current government’s administration and the management of state resources. One of the triggering factors of this crisis was the increase in electricity prices for those clients pre...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a32021-11-11T19:34:09ZImpact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile10.3390/su1321118702071-1050https://doaj.org/article/70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a32021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11870https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050The Chilean socio-political explosion in October 2019 embodies a milestone in Chile’s national history, challenging the current government’s administration and the management of state resources. One of the triggering factors of this crisis was the increase in electricity prices for those clients previously subject to flat pricing. As an example, in 2019, electricity fees increased by 25% at the national level. In order to solve the conflict, the Ministry of Energy proposed a mechanism, applicable for two years, which would freeze energy charges for companies, industries and domestic customers subject to a regulated tariff. This mechanism was employed and would produce a debt favoring generation companies, which could not exceed CLD 1.350 million. This article analyzes the effectiveness of the energy price stabilization mechanism and the effects of the Chilean socio-economic instability—resulting from the aggregated debt generated by the mechanism applicability—on the exchange rate over its duration of operation. The results suggest that the effects of the current law will not fulfill the purpose of tariff stabilization until 2024; additionally, there will be a sustained increase in tariffs until the year 2027.Humberto Verdejo FredesBenjamin AcostaMauricio OlivaresFernando García-MuñozFrancisco TobarVannia ToroCesar SmithCristhian BeckerMDPI AGarticleenergy pricesocio-political crisisregulated clientsEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11870, p 11870 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
energy price socio-political crisis regulated clients Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
energy price socio-political crisis regulated clients Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Humberto Verdejo Fredes Benjamin Acosta Mauricio Olivares Fernando García-Muñoz Francisco Tobar Vannia Toro Cesar Smith Cristhian Becker Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile |
description |
The Chilean socio-political explosion in October 2019 embodies a milestone in Chile’s national history, challenging the current government’s administration and the management of state resources. One of the triggering factors of this crisis was the increase in electricity prices for those clients previously subject to flat pricing. As an example, in 2019, electricity fees increased by 25% at the national level. In order to solve the conflict, the Ministry of Energy proposed a mechanism, applicable for two years, which would freeze energy charges for companies, industries and domestic customers subject to a regulated tariff. This mechanism was employed and would produce a debt favoring generation companies, which could not exceed CLD 1.350 million. This article analyzes the effectiveness of the energy price stabilization mechanism and the effects of the Chilean socio-economic instability—resulting from the aggregated debt generated by the mechanism applicability—on the exchange rate over its duration of operation. The results suggest that the effects of the current law will not fulfill the purpose of tariff stabilization until 2024; additionally, there will be a sustained increase in tariffs until the year 2027. |
format |
article |
author |
Humberto Verdejo Fredes Benjamin Acosta Mauricio Olivares Fernando García-Muñoz Francisco Tobar Vannia Toro Cesar Smith Cristhian Becker |
author_facet |
Humberto Verdejo Fredes Benjamin Acosta Mauricio Olivares Fernando García-Muñoz Francisco Tobar Vannia Toro Cesar Smith Cristhian Becker |
author_sort |
Humberto Verdejo Fredes |
title |
Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile |
title_short |
Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile |
title_full |
Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Energy Price Stabilization Mechanism on Regulated Clients’ Tariffs: The Case of Chile |
title_sort |
impact of energy price stabilization mechanism on regulated clients’ tariffs: the case of chile |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/70f8afb2e6864bb09343bef3ec8603a3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT humbertoverdejofredes impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT benjaminacosta impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT mauricioolivares impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT fernandogarciamunoz impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT franciscotobar impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT vanniatoro impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT cesarsmith impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile AT cristhianbecker impactofenergypricestabilizationmechanismonregulatedclientstariffsthecaseofchile |
_version_ |
1718431472498507776 |