Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered the most common sustained arrhythmia. Major cardiovascular risk factors that have been identified to initiate and perpetuate AF include age, sex, arterial hypertension, heart failure, valvular heart disease and diabetes mellitus. In the literature, several stud...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Louka Anna Maria, Tsagkaris Christos, Stoica Alexandra
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Sciendo 2021
Materias:	atrial fibrillation/diagnosis cardiac arrhythmias/atrial fibrillation cardiovascular diseases/epidemiology ethnic groups prognosis risk assessment risk factors Internal medicine RC31-1245
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7136b2cf129f4014a74bafc1af0bf858
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7136b2cf129f4014a74bafc1af0bf858
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7136b2cf129f4014a74bafc1af0bf8582021-12-05T14:11:10ZClinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review2501-062X10.2478/rjim-2021-0018https://doaj.org/article/7136b2cf129f4014a74bafc1af0bf8582021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2021-0018https://doaj.org/toc/2501-062XAtrial fibrillation (AF) is considered the most common sustained arrhythmia. Major cardiovascular risk factors that have been identified to initiate and perpetuate AF include age, sex, arterial hypertension, heart failure, valvular heart disease and diabetes mellitus. In the literature, several studies aimed to formulate easily – applied and accurate risk stratification scores, based on antecedent cardiovascular events, comorbidities and biomarkers for the prediction of new-onset AF. The present narrative review addresses the most universally accepted and efficient clinical scores, with an extended applicability in different populations and ages, particularly scores derived from the Framingham Heart Study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, as well as the CHARGE-AF, the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HATCH and CH2EST scores. Identification of incident AF can be challenging, thus dictating for utilization of validated clinical instruments in everyday clinical practice.Louka Anna MariaTsagkaris ChristosStoica AlexandraSciendoarticleatrial fibrillation/diagnosiscardiac arrhythmias/atrial fibrillationcardiovascular diseases/epidemiologyethnic groupsprognosisrisk assessmentrisk factorsInternal medicineRC31-1245ENRomanian Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol 59, Iss 4, Pp 321-327 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	atrial fibrillation/diagnosis cardiac arrhythmias/atrial fibrillation cardiovascular diseases/epidemiology ethnic groups prognosis risk assessment risk factors Internal medicine RC31-1245
spellingShingle	atrial fibrillation/diagnosis cardiac arrhythmias/atrial fibrillation cardiovascular diseases/epidemiology ethnic groups prognosis risk assessment risk factors Internal medicine RC31-1245 Louka Anna Maria Tsagkaris Christos Stoica Alexandra Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
description	Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered the most common sustained arrhythmia. Major cardiovascular risk factors that have been identified to initiate and perpetuate AF include age, sex, arterial hypertension, heart failure, valvular heart disease and diabetes mellitus. In the literature, several studies aimed to formulate easily – applied and accurate risk stratification scores, based on antecedent cardiovascular events, comorbidities and biomarkers for the prediction of new-onset AF. The present narrative review addresses the most universally accepted and efficient clinical scores, with an extended applicability in different populations and ages, particularly scores derived from the Framingham Heart Study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, as well as the CHARGE-AF, the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HATCH and CH2EST scores. Identification of incident AF can be challenging, thus dictating for utilization of validated clinical instruments in everyday clinical practice.
format	article
author	Louka Anna Maria Tsagkaris Christos Stoica Alexandra
author_facet	Louka Anna Maria Tsagkaris Christos Stoica Alexandra
author_sort	Louka Anna Maria
title	Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
title_short	Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
title_full	Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
title_fullStr	Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
title_full_unstemmed	Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
title_sort	clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review
publisher	Sciendo
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7136b2cf129f4014a74bafc1af0bf858
work_keys_str_mv	AT loukaannamaria clinicalriskscoresforthepredictionofincidentatrialfibrillationamodernizedreview AT tsagkarischristos clinicalriskscoresforthepredictionofincidentatrialfibrillationamodernizedreview AT stoicaalexandra clinicalriskscoresforthepredictionofincidentatrialfibrillationamodernizedreview
_version_	1718371305259008000

Clinical risk scores for the prediction of incident atrial fibrillation: a modernized review

Ejemplares similares