The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?

Michael Patrick Lux, 1 Oriana Ciani, 2 William CN Dunlop, 3 Andrea Ferris, 4 Michael Friedlander 5 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus Salzkotten, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; 2Centre for Research...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lux MP, Ciani O, Dunlop WCN, Ferris A, Friedlander M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7141aa4bc7d84c90867649d7c0dedaf4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7141aa4bc7d84c90867649d7c0dedaf4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7141aa4bc7d84c90867649d7c0dedaf42021-11-11T18:22:26ZThe Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?1179-1322https://doaj.org/article/7141aa4bc7d84c90867649d7c0dedaf42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-impasse-on-overall-survival-in-oncology-reimbursement-decision-mak-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CMARhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322Michael Patrick Lux, 1 Oriana Ciani, 2 William CN Dunlop, 3 Andrea Ferris, 4 Michael Friedlander 5 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus Salzkotten, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; 2Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy; 3AstraZeneca, City House, Cambridge, UK; 4LUNGevity Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA; 5Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales and Department of Medical Oncology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCorrespondence: Michael Patrick LuxDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Husener Str. 81, Paderborn, 33098, GermanyTel +49 5251 864121Email m.lux@vincenz.deAbstract: Mature overall survival (OS) data are often unavailable at the time of regulatory and reimbursement decisions for a new cancer treatment. For patients with early-stage cancers treated with potentially curative treatments, demonstrating an OS benefit may take years and may be confounded by subsequent lines of therapy or crossover to the investigational treatment. For patients with advanced-stage cancers, mature OS data may be available but difficult to interpret for similar reasons. There are strong opinions about approval and reimbursement in the absence of mature OS data, with concerns over delay in patient access set against concerns about uncertainty in long-term benefit. This position paper reflects our individual views as patient advocate, clinician or health economist on one aspect of this debate. We look at payer decisions in the absence of mature OS data, considering when and how non-OS trial outcomes could inform decision-making and how uncertainty can be addressed beyond the trial, supporting these views with evidence from the literature. We consider when it is reasonable for payers to expect or not expect mature OS data at the initial reimbursement decision (based on criteria such as cancer stage and treatment efficacy) acknowledging that there are settings in which mature OS data are expected. We propose flexible strategies for generating and appraising patient-relevant evidence, including context-relevant endpoints and quality of life measures, when survival rates are good and mature OS data are not expected. We note that fair reimbursement is important; this means valuing patient benefit as shown through prespecified endpoints and reappraising if there is ongoing uncertainty or failure to show a sustained benefit. We suggest that reimbursement systems continue to evolve to align with scientific advances, because innovation is only meaningful if readily accessible to patients. The proposed strategies have the potential to promote thorough assessment of potential benefit to patients and lead to timely access to effective medicines.Keywords: drug approval, endpoint determination, medical oncology, quality of life, surrogate endpoint, uncertaintyLux MPCiani ODunlop WCNFerris AFriedlander MDove Medical Pressarticledrug approvalendpoint determinationmedical oncologyquality of lifesurrogate endpointuncertaintyNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancer Management and Research, Vol Volume 13, Pp 8457-8471 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic drug approval
endpoint determination
medical oncology
quality of life
surrogate endpoint
uncertainty
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle drug approval
endpoint determination
medical oncology
quality of life
surrogate endpoint
uncertainty
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Lux MP
Ciani O
Dunlop WCN
Ferris A
Friedlander M
The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
description Michael Patrick Lux, 1 Oriana Ciani, 2 William CN Dunlop, 3 Andrea Ferris, 4 Michael Friedlander 5 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus Salzkotten, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; 2Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy; 3AstraZeneca, City House, Cambridge, UK; 4LUNGevity Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA; 5Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales and Department of Medical Oncology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCorrespondence: Michael Patrick LuxDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Husener Str. 81, Paderborn, 33098, GermanyTel +49 5251 864121Email m.lux@vincenz.deAbstract: Mature overall survival (OS) data are often unavailable at the time of regulatory and reimbursement decisions for a new cancer treatment. For patients with early-stage cancers treated with potentially curative treatments, demonstrating an OS benefit may take years and may be confounded by subsequent lines of therapy or crossover to the investigational treatment. For patients with advanced-stage cancers, mature OS data may be available but difficult to interpret for similar reasons. There are strong opinions about approval and reimbursement in the absence of mature OS data, with concerns over delay in patient access set against concerns about uncertainty in long-term benefit. This position paper reflects our individual views as patient advocate, clinician or health economist on one aspect of this debate. We look at payer decisions in the absence of mature OS data, considering when and how non-OS trial outcomes could inform decision-making and how uncertainty can be addressed beyond the trial, supporting these views with evidence from the literature. We consider when it is reasonable for payers to expect or not expect mature OS data at the initial reimbursement decision (based on criteria such as cancer stage and treatment efficacy) acknowledging that there are settings in which mature OS data are expected. We propose flexible strategies for generating and appraising patient-relevant evidence, including context-relevant endpoints and quality of life measures, when survival rates are good and mature OS data are not expected. We note that fair reimbursement is important; this means valuing patient benefit as shown through prespecified endpoints and reappraising if there is ongoing uncertainty or failure to show a sustained benefit. We suggest that reimbursement systems continue to evolve to align with scientific advances, because innovation is only meaningful if readily accessible to patients. The proposed strategies have the potential to promote thorough assessment of potential benefit to patients and lead to timely access to effective medicines.Keywords: drug approval, endpoint determination, medical oncology, quality of life, surrogate endpoint, uncertainty
format article
author Lux MP
Ciani O
Dunlop WCN
Ferris A
Friedlander M
author_facet Lux MP
Ciani O
Dunlop WCN
Ferris A
Friedlander M
author_sort Lux MP
title The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
title_short The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
title_full The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
title_fullStr The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
title_full_unstemmed The Impasse on Overall Survival in Oncology Reimbursement Decision-Making: How Can We Resolve This?
title_sort impasse on overall survival in oncology reimbursement decision-making: how can we resolve this?
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7141aa4bc7d84c90867649d7c0dedaf4
work_keys_str_mv AT luxmp theimpasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT cianio theimpasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT dunlopwcn theimpasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT ferrisa theimpasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT friedlanderm theimpasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT luxmp impasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT cianio impasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT dunlopwcn impasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT ferrisa impasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
AT friedlanderm impasseonoverallsurvivalinoncologyreimbursementdecisionmakinghowcanweresolvethis
_version_ 1718431828101038080