Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace
Although the phenomena of organizational silence (OS) and voice are widely observed in the organizations, there exists little empirical evidence regarding their surface and deep conceptualizations and/or multiple paradoxes associated with their interaction. The study aims to investigate the surface...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/71530bc2d2314af6b4c8841370ffa89a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:71530bc2d2314af6b4c8841370ffa89a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:71530bc2d2314af6b4c8841370ffa89a2021-12-02T10:44:29ZSurface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace2331-197510.1080/23311975.2016.1221560https://doaj.org/article/71530bc2d2314af6b4c8841370ffa89a2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1221560https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975Although the phenomena of organizational silence (OS) and voice are widely observed in the organizations, there exists little empirical evidence regarding their surface and deep conceptualizations and/or multiple paradoxes associated with their interaction. The study aims to investigate the surface and deep conceptualizations of these paradoxes while presenting its theoretical and empirical rationale for the possible differences based on relationships with subdimension of counterproductive work behavior and organizational identification among women at workplace. A sample of 168 women academicians was collected from three universities at three different stages of their lifecycle. The results indicate that on surface OS and voice display similar direct and moderating relationships with CWB and OI, respectively. However, the analysis of deep conceptualization shows that motives behind the paradoxes of silence and voice play an important role in shaping their relationships; with prosocial motives being most influential. With an empirical analysis, the study highlights the motives of silence and voice paradoxes and introduces new avenues for studying the interaction of multiple paradoxes associated with work behaviors in organizations.Asad ShahjehanMuhammad YasirTaylor & Francis Grouparticleorganizational silenceorganizational voicecounterproductive work behaviororganizational identificationparadoxgenderBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
organizational silence organizational voice counterproductive work behavior organizational identification paradox gender Business HF5001-6182 Management. Industrial management HD28-70 |
spellingShingle |
organizational silence organizational voice counterproductive work behavior organizational identification paradox gender Business HF5001-6182 Management. Industrial management HD28-70 Asad Shahjehan Muhammad Yasir Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
description |
Although the phenomena of organizational silence (OS) and voice are widely observed in the organizations, there exists little empirical evidence regarding their surface and deep conceptualizations and/or multiple paradoxes associated with their interaction. The study aims to investigate the surface and deep conceptualizations of these paradoxes while presenting its theoretical and empirical rationale for the possible differences based on relationships with subdimension of counterproductive work behavior and organizational identification among women at workplace. A sample of 168 women academicians was collected from three universities at three different stages of their lifecycle. The results indicate that on surface OS and voice display similar direct and moderating relationships with CWB and OI, respectively. However, the analysis of deep conceptualization shows that motives behind the paradoxes of silence and voice play an important role in shaping their relationships; with prosocial motives being most influential. With an empirical analysis, the study highlights the motives of silence and voice paradoxes and introduces new avenues for studying the interaction of multiple paradoxes associated with work behaviors in organizations. |
format |
article |
author |
Asad Shahjehan Muhammad Yasir |
author_facet |
Asad Shahjehan Muhammad Yasir |
author_sort |
Asad Shahjehan |
title |
Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
title_short |
Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
title_full |
Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
title_fullStr |
Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: An empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
title_sort |
surface and deep conceptualizations of silence and voice paradoxes: an empirical analysis of women behavior at workplace |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/71530bc2d2314af6b4c8841370ffa89a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT asadshahjehan surfaceanddeepconceptualizationsofsilenceandvoiceparadoxesanempiricalanalysisofwomenbehavioratworkplace AT muhammadyasir surfaceanddeepconceptualizationsofsilenceandvoiceparadoxesanempiricalanalysisofwomenbehavioratworkplace |
_version_ |
1718396767521734656 |