«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM

The article analyses the state of the art and the prospects of the Russian political science in terms of scientific communication. Political science develops through discussion on key problems of its subject matter: political power, legitimacy, justice, political regimes, etc. The quality of the dis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	M. V. Kharkevich
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2013
Materias:	russian political science governance of scientific communication peer review scientific schools International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/717bc812fbe144e6a05775b76fddf043
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:717bc812fbe144e6a05775b76fddf043
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:717bc812fbe144e6a05775b76fddf0432021-11-23T14:50:55Z«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2013-6-33-215-219https://doaj.org/article/717bc812fbe144e6a05775b76fddf0432013-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1168https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The article analyses the state of the art and the prospects of the Russian political science in terms of scientific communication. Political science develops through discussion on key problems of its subject matter: political power, legitimacy, justice, political regimes, etc. The quality of the discussion shapes the development of political science. The basic medium of the discussion remains an article in a scientific journal. Editorial policy of the leading journals is a key instrument for shaping the discussion and defining its norms and standards. There are few challenges for the Russian political science with respect to the development of a dialogue among its authors and scientific schools. First, it still has a form of a monologue rather than dialogue. There are a number of attempts to establish a dialogue with the leading foreign authors and a deficit of discussion among Russian political scientists. Second, double blind peer review still remains a rear practice. It is the only means for ensuring the high quality of scientific communication. Third, the quality of the discussion directly depends upon the differentiation of political science in the form of scientific schools. The Russian political science has a low degree of school differentiation. And the few schools that did manage to get established evade a dialogue on constitutive questions on theory and practice of political science. The author suggests that coordination of the leading journals’ editorial policy through different forms of institutional interactions including the Russian Political Science Association and the Russian International Studies Association might be an effective tool to encourage the discussion in the Russian political science and dialogue among its schools.M. V. KharkevichMGIMO University Pressarticlerussian political sciencegovernance of scientific communicationpeer reviewscientific schoolsInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 6(33), Pp 215-219 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	russian political science governance of scientific communication peer review scientific schools International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	russian political science governance of scientific communication peer review scientific schools International relations JZ2-6530 M. V. Kharkevich «BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
description	The article analyses the state of the art and the prospects of the Russian political science in terms of scientific communication. Political science develops through discussion on key problems of its subject matter: political power, legitimacy, justice, political regimes, etc. The quality of the discussion shapes the development of political science. The basic medium of the discussion remains an article in a scientific journal. Editorial policy of the leading journals is a key instrument for shaping the discussion and defining its norms and standards. There are few challenges for the Russian political science with respect to the development of a dialogue among its authors and scientific schools. First, it still has a form of a monologue rather than dialogue. There are a number of attempts to establish a dialogue with the leading foreign authors and a deficit of discussion among Russian political scientists. Second, double blind peer review still remains a rear practice. It is the only means for ensuring the high quality of scientific communication. Third, the quality of the discussion directly depends upon the differentiation of political science in the form of scientific schools. The Russian political science has a low degree of school differentiation. And the few schools that did manage to get established evade a dialogue on constitutive questions on theory and practice of political science. The author suggests that coordination of the leading journals’ editorial policy through different forms of institutional interactions including the Russian Political Science Association and the Russian International Studies Association might be an effective tool to encourage the discussion in the Russian political science and dialogue among its schools.
format	article
author	M. V. Kharkevich
author_facet	M. V. Kharkevich
author_sort	M. V. Kharkevich
title	«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
title_short	«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
title_full	«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
title_fullStr	«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
title_full_unstemmed	«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
title_sort	«brain drain» from russia as a political-management problem
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/717bc812fbe144e6a05775b76fddf043
work_keys_str_mv	AT mvkharkevich braindrainfromrussiaasapoliticalmanagementproblem
_version_	1718416401793810432

«BRAIN DRAIN» FROM RUSSIA AS A POLITICAL-MANAGEMENT PROBLEM

Ejemplares similares