Induction of Labor with Vaginal Dinoprostone (PGE<sub>2</sub>) in Patients with a Previous Cesarean Section: Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes

Background: Vaginal dinoprostone (PGE<sub>2</sub>) is currently used as the prostaglandin of choice in many obstetric units. However, few studies have evaluated its safety, especially in women who previously had a cesarean section. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PGE<...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuria López-Jiménez, Fiamma García-Sánchez, Rafael Hernández Pailos, Valentin Rodrigo-Álvaro, Ana Pascual-Pedreño, María Moreno-Cid, Antonio Hernández-Martínez, Milagros Molina-Alarcón
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/71b81a4ee1184f848d6d3216f8381984
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Vaginal dinoprostone (PGE<sub>2</sub>) is currently used as the prostaglandin of choice in many obstetric units. However, few studies have evaluated its safety, especially in women who previously had a cesarean section. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PGE<sub>2</sub> in pregnant women who are undergoing induction of labor (IOL), and who have had a previous cesarean section. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in La Mancha Centro Hospital in Alcázar de San Juan, Spain, from 1 February 2019 to 30 August 2020. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes, following IOL with PGE<sub>2</sub>, in 47 pregnant women who wanted a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), and 377 pregnant women without a history of cesarean section, were analyzed. The outcomes were analyzed by bivariate and multivariate analyses using binary and multiple linear regression. Results: A total of 424 women were included in this study. The percentage of cesarean sections in the TOLAC group was 44.7% (21), compared with 31.6% (119) in the group without a history of cesarean section (adjusted odds ratio: 1.4; 95% CI: 0.68–2.86). In the multivariate analysis, no statistically significant differences were observed between both groups for obstetric and neonatal outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, two uterine ruptures (4.3%) occurred in the group of patients with a history of cesarean section who underwent IOL with PGE<sub>2</sub>. Conclusions: The induction of labor with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE<sub>2</sub>), in patients with a previous history of cesarean section, was not associated with worse obstetric or neonatal outcomes compared with the group of patients without a history of cesarean section in our study sample. However, further research is needed regarding this IOL method, and it should be used with caution in this population group.