The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study

The aim of this experimental study was to verify thermal diffusion differences, by measuring the maximum temperature achieved with different drill shapes. Synthetic bone blocks of type I density made from solid rigid polyurethane (PUR) foam were used to perform the drilling procedures. The experimen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Stefan Ihde, Bartosz Dalewski, Łukasz Pałka
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	conical drill cylindrical drill cutting disc cortical bone dental implants Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/71efe2e47a5f43918ba8fd6b6af75df5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:71efe2e47a5f43918ba8fd6b6af75df5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:71efe2e47a5f43918ba8fd6b6af75df52021-11-11T15:02:54ZThe Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study10.3390/app112199612076-3417https://doaj.org/article/71efe2e47a5f43918ba8fd6b6af75df52021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/9961https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417The aim of this experimental study was to verify thermal diffusion differences, by measuring the maximum temperature achieved with different drill shapes. Synthetic bone blocks of type I density made from solid rigid polyurethane (PUR) foam were used to perform the drilling procedures. The experiment was conducted at three different rotation speeds: 800, 3000 and 5000 rpm. Conical drills (with and without an internal cooling hole) were compared with horizontal drills and disc drills. The temperature during drilling for implant bed preparation was estimated with the use of thermocouples and an infrared (IR) camera. The temperature during drilling with disc cutters for lateral basal implants did not exceed 33 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>C and the temperature decreased in proportion to higher drill speed. The results indicate that the tested design is safe and will not cause bone overheating.Stefan IhdeBartosz DalewskiŁukasz PałkaMDPI AGarticleconical drillcylindrical drillcutting disccortical bonedental implantsTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 9961, p 9961 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	conical drill cylindrical drill cutting disc cortical bone dental implants Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999
spellingShingle	conical drill cylindrical drill cutting disc cortical bone dental implants Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Stefan Ihde Bartosz Dalewski Łukasz Pałka The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study
description	The aim of this experimental study was to verify thermal diffusion differences, by measuring the maximum temperature achieved with different drill shapes. Synthetic bone blocks of type I density made from solid rigid polyurethane (PUR) foam were used to perform the drilling procedures. The experiment was conducted at three different rotation speeds: 800, 3000 and 5000 rpm. Conical drills (with and without an internal cooling hole) were compared with horizontal drills and disc drills. The temperature during drilling for implant bed preparation was estimated with the use of thermocouples and an infrared (IR) camera. The temperature during drilling with disc cutters for lateral basal implants did not exceed 33 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>C and the temperature decreased in proportion to higher drill speed. The results indicate that the tested design is safe and will not cause bone overheating.
format	article
author	Stefan Ihde Bartosz Dalewski Łukasz Pałka
author_facet	Stefan Ihde Bartosz Dalewski Łukasz Pałka
author_sort	Stefan Ihde
title	The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study
title_short	The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study
title_full	The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr	The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed	The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study
title_sort	assessment of the maximum heat production and cooling effectiveness of three different drill types (conical vs. cylindrical vs. horizontal) during implant bed preparation—an in vitro study
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/71efe2e47a5f43918ba8fd6b6af75df5
work_keys_str_mv	AT stefanihde theassessmentofthemaximumheatproductionandcoolingeffectivenessofthreedifferentdrilltypesconicalvscylindricalvshorizontalduringimplantbedpreparationaninvitrostudy AT bartoszdalewski theassessmentofthemaximumheatproductionandcoolingeffectivenessofthreedifferentdrilltypesconicalvscylindricalvshorizontalduringimplantbedpreparationaninvitrostudy AT łukaszpałka theassessmentofthemaximumheatproductionandcoolingeffectivenessofthreedifferentdrilltypesconicalvscylindricalvshorizontalduringimplantbedpreparationaninvitrostudy AT stefanihde assessmentofthemaximumheatproductionandcoolingeffectivenessofthreedifferentdrilltypesconicalvscylindricalvshorizontalduringimplantbedpreparationaninvitrostudy AT bartoszdalewski assessmentofthemaximumheatproductionandcoolingeffectivenessofthreedifferentdrilltypesconicalvscylindricalvshorizontalduringimplantbedpreparationaninvitrostudy AT łukaszpałka assessmentofthemaximumheatproductionandcoolingeffectivenessofthreedifferentdrilltypesconicalvscylindricalvshorizontalduringimplantbedpreparationaninvitrostudy
_version_	1718437321280323584

The Assessment of the Maximum Heat Production and Cooling Effectiveness of Three Different Drill Types (Conical vs. Cylindrical vs. Horizontal) during Implant Bed Preparation—An In Vitro Study

Ejemplares similares