Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?

Background: Judges may experience mental health problems, which reduces their performance in juridical cases, and constitutes a great threat to both the authority of law and social justice. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among judges and examine the effect of pe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenwen Kong, Hui Wang, Jianmei Zhang, Danhong Shen, Danjun Feng
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/71f1b31bf2f54c71912703dd49732ed7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:71f1b31bf2f54c71912703dd49732ed7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:71f1b31bf2f54c71912703dd49732ed72021-12-02T18:23:25ZPerfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?2251-60852251-6093https://doaj.org/article/71f1b31bf2f54c71912703dd49732ed72021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/19019https://doaj.org/toc/2251-6085https://doaj.org/toc/2251-6093 Background: Judges may experience mental health problems, which reduces their performance in juridical cases, and constitutes a great threat to both the authority of law and social justice. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among judges and examine the effect of perfectionism on psychological distress with age and gender as the moderators. Methods: This survey was carried out in person with 565 Chinese judges in 2016, using the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. The effects of perfectionism on psychological distress was explored by Structural Equation Model (SEM), and the moderating effects of age and gender were tested by Multi-group analysis. Results: Psychological distress was reported by 89.20% of the judges surveyed. Discrepancy had a significant positive effect on psychological distress, but order had a significant negative effect on psychological distress, with high standards exerting no significant effect. Age had a significant moderating effect, whereas the moderating effect of gender was not significant. Conclusion: The three dimensions of perfectionism exerted different effects on psychological distress of Chinese judges, and the relationships were moderated by age. Wenwen KongHui WangJianmei ZhangDanhong ShenDanjun FengTehran University of Medical SciencesarticleJudgeMental healthPerfectionismModerating effectChinaPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENIranian Journal of Public Health, Vol 50, Iss 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Judge
Mental health
Perfectionism
Moderating effect
China
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Judge
Mental health
Perfectionism
Moderating effect
China
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Wenwen Kong
Hui Wang
Jianmei Zhang
Danhong Shen
Danjun Feng
Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?
description Background: Judges may experience mental health problems, which reduces their performance in juridical cases, and constitutes a great threat to both the authority of law and social justice. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among judges and examine the effect of perfectionism on psychological distress with age and gender as the moderators. Methods: This survey was carried out in person with 565 Chinese judges in 2016, using the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. The effects of perfectionism on psychological distress was explored by Structural Equation Model (SEM), and the moderating effects of age and gender were tested by Multi-group analysis. Results: Psychological distress was reported by 89.20% of the judges surveyed. Discrepancy had a significant positive effect on psychological distress, but order had a significant negative effect on psychological distress, with high standards exerting no significant effect. Age had a significant moderating effect, whereas the moderating effect of gender was not significant. Conclusion: The three dimensions of perfectionism exerted different effects on psychological distress of Chinese judges, and the relationships were moderated by age.
format article
author Wenwen Kong
Hui Wang
Jianmei Zhang
Danhong Shen
Danjun Feng
author_facet Wenwen Kong
Hui Wang
Jianmei Zhang
Danhong Shen
Danjun Feng
author_sort Wenwen Kong
title Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?
title_short Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?
title_full Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?
title_fullStr Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?
title_full_unstemmed Perfectionism and Psychological Distress among Chinese Judg-es: Do Age and Gender Make a Difference?
title_sort perfectionism and psychological distress among chinese judg-es: do age and gender make a difference?
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/71f1b31bf2f54c71912703dd49732ed7
work_keys_str_mv AT wenwenkong perfectionismandpsychologicaldistressamongchinesejudgesdoageandgendermakeadifference
AT huiwang perfectionismandpsychologicaldistressamongchinesejudgesdoageandgendermakeadifference
AT jianmeizhang perfectionismandpsychologicaldistressamongchinesejudgesdoageandgendermakeadifference
AT danhongshen perfectionismandpsychologicaldistressamongchinesejudgesdoageandgendermakeadifference
AT danjunfeng perfectionismandpsychologicaldistressamongchinesejudgesdoageandgendermakeadifference
_version_ 1718378103667949568