Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas

Introduction: Despite UN recommendations to monitor food insecurity using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), to date there are no published reports of its validity for The Bahamas, nor have prevalence rates of moderate or severe food insecurity been reported for the remote island nation...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allison Karpyn, M Headley, Zeleka Knowles, Erecia Hepburn, Nicole Kennedy, Henry Wolgast, Danielle Riser, Akisha Osei Sarfo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: James Cook University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/721f311c95f94138899fa641612d9b2c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:721f311c95f94138899fa641612d9b2c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:721f311c95f94138899fa641612d9b2c2021-11-10T06:02:31ZValidity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas10.22605/RRH67241445-6354https://doaj.org/article/721f311c95f94138899fa641612d9b2c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/6724/https://doaj.org/toc/1445-6354 Introduction: Despite UN recommendations to monitor food insecurity using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), to date there are no published reports of its validity for The Bahamas, nor have prevalence rates of moderate or severe food insecurity been reported for the remote island nation. At the same time, food security is a deep concern, with increasing incidence of natural disasters and health concerns related to diet-related disease and dietary quality plaguing the nation and its food system. This article aims to examine the validity of the FIES for use in The Bahamas, the prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity, and the sociodemographic factors that contribute to increased food insecurity. Methods: The FIES survey was administered by randomized and weighted landline telephone survey in Nassau in The Bahamas to 1000 participants in June and July 2017. The Rasch modelling procedure was applied to examine tool validity and prevalence of food insecurity. Equating procedures calibrated this study's results to the global FIES reference scale and computed internationally comparable prevalence rates of both moderate and severe food insecurity. A regression analysis assessed the relationship between household variables and food security. Results: The FIES met benchmarks for fit statistics for all eight items and the overall Rasch reliability is 0.7. As of 2017, Bahamians' prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity was 21%, and the prevalence of severe food insecurity was 10%. Statistically significant variables that contribute to food insecurity included education, age, gender, and presence of diabetes, high blood pressure, or heart disease. Results also indicated that Bahamians experience food insecurity differently than populations across the globe, likely due in large part to the workings of an isolated food system heavily dependent on foreign imports. Responses showed that by the time a Bahamian worries they will not have enough food to eat, they have already restricted their meals to a few kinds of foods and begun to limit their intake of vegetables and fruits. Conclusion: This study, which is among the first to comprehensively measure food security in The Bahamas, provides a baseline for further research and evaluation of practices aimed at mitigating food insecurity in small island developing states. Further, this study provides a benchmark for future research, which may seek to understand the impacts of Hurricane Dorian and COVID-19, disasters further isolating the remote island nation. Post-disaster food security data are needed to further understand the extent to which food security is impacted by natural disasters and identify which sectors and stakeholders are most vital in restructuring the agricultural sector and improving food availability following catastrophic events. Allison KarpynM HeadleyZeleka KnowlesErecia HepburnNicole KennedyHenry WolgastDanielle RiserAkisha Osei SarfoJames Cook UniversityarticleBahamasCaribbeandisparitiesfood insecurityhunger.Special situations and conditionsRC952-1245Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENRural and Remote Health, Vol 21 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bahamas
Caribbean
disparities
food insecurity
hunger.
Special situations and conditions
RC952-1245
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Bahamas
Caribbean
disparities
food insecurity
hunger.
Special situations and conditions
RC952-1245
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Allison Karpyn
M Headley
Zeleka Knowles
Erecia Hepburn
Nicole Kennedy
Henry Wolgast
Danielle Riser
Akisha Osei Sarfo
Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas
description Introduction: Despite UN recommendations to monitor food insecurity using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), to date there are no published reports of its validity for The Bahamas, nor have prevalence rates of moderate or severe food insecurity been reported for the remote island nation. At the same time, food security is a deep concern, with increasing incidence of natural disasters and health concerns related to diet-related disease and dietary quality plaguing the nation and its food system. This article aims to examine the validity of the FIES for use in The Bahamas, the prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity, and the sociodemographic factors that contribute to increased food insecurity. Methods: The FIES survey was administered by randomized and weighted landline telephone survey in Nassau in The Bahamas to 1000 participants in June and July 2017. The Rasch modelling procedure was applied to examine tool validity and prevalence of food insecurity. Equating procedures calibrated this study's results to the global FIES reference scale and computed internationally comparable prevalence rates of both moderate and severe food insecurity. A regression analysis assessed the relationship between household variables and food security. Results: The FIES met benchmarks for fit statistics for all eight items and the overall Rasch reliability is 0.7. As of 2017, Bahamians' prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity was 21%, and the prevalence of severe food insecurity was 10%. Statistically significant variables that contribute to food insecurity included education, age, gender, and presence of diabetes, high blood pressure, or heart disease. Results also indicated that Bahamians experience food insecurity differently than populations across the globe, likely due in large part to the workings of an isolated food system heavily dependent on foreign imports. Responses showed that by the time a Bahamian worries they will not have enough food to eat, they have already restricted their meals to a few kinds of foods and begun to limit their intake of vegetables and fruits. Conclusion: This study, which is among the first to comprehensively measure food security in The Bahamas, provides a baseline for further research and evaluation of practices aimed at mitigating food insecurity in small island developing states. Further, this study provides a benchmark for future research, which may seek to understand the impacts of Hurricane Dorian and COVID-19, disasters further isolating the remote island nation. Post-disaster food security data are needed to further understand the extent to which food security is impacted by natural disasters and identify which sectors and stakeholders are most vital in restructuring the agricultural sector and improving food availability following catastrophic events.
format article
author Allison Karpyn
M Headley
Zeleka Knowles
Erecia Hepburn
Nicole Kennedy
Henry Wolgast
Danielle Riser
Akisha Osei Sarfo
author_facet Allison Karpyn
M Headley
Zeleka Knowles
Erecia Hepburn
Nicole Kennedy
Henry Wolgast
Danielle Riser
Akisha Osei Sarfo
author_sort Allison Karpyn
title Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas
title_short Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas
title_full Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas
title_fullStr Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and prevalence of food insecurity in The Bahamas
title_sort validity of the food insecurity experience scale and prevalence of food insecurity in the bahamas
publisher James Cook University
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/721f311c95f94138899fa641612d9b2c
work_keys_str_mv AT allisonkarpyn validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT mheadley validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT zelekaknowles validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT ereciahepburn validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT nicolekennedy validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT henrywolgast validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT danielleriser validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
AT akishaoseisarfo validityofthefoodinsecurityexperiencescaleandprevalenceoffoodinsecurityinthebahamas
_version_ 1718440478061363200