Deepfakes in Ophthalmology

Purpose: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are deep learning (DL) models that can create and modify realistic-appearing synthetic images, or deepfakes, from real images. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of experts to discern synthesized retinal fundus images from real fundus...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimmy S. Chen, MD, Aaron S. Coyner, PhD, R.V. Paul Chan, MD, M. Elizabeth Hartnett, MD, Darius M. Moshfeghi, MD, Leah A. Owen, MD, PhD, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, PhD, Michael F. Chiang, MD, MA, J. Peter Campbell, MD, MPH
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/724242de3b5f4588ac9b5f2db684fce5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:724242de3b5f4588ac9b5f2db684fce5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:724242de3b5f4588ac9b5f2db684fce52021-11-28T04:39:33ZDeepfakes in Ophthalmology2666-914510.1016/j.xops.2021.100079https://doaj.org/article/724242de3b5f4588ac9b5f2db684fce52021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914521000816https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9145Purpose: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are deep learning (DL) models that can create and modify realistic-appearing synthetic images, or deepfakes, from real images. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of experts to discern synthesized retinal fundus images from real fundus images and to review the current uses and limitations of GANs in ophthalmology. Design: Development and expert evaluation of a GAN and an informal review of the literature. Participants: A total of 4282 image pairs of fundus images and retinal vessel maps acquired from a multicenter ROP screening program. Methods: Pix2Pix HD, a high-resolution GAN, was first trained and validated on fundus and vessel map image pairs and subsequently used to generate 880 images from a held-out test set. Fifty synthetic images from this test set and 50 different real images were presented to 4 expert ROP ophthalmologists using a custom online system for evaluation of whether the images were real or synthetic. Literature was reviewed on PubMed and Google Scholars using combinations of the terms ophthalmology, GANs, generative adversarial networks, ophthalmology, images, deepfakes, and synthetic. Ancestor search was performed to broaden results. Main Outcome Measures: Expert ability to discern real versus synthetic images was evaluated using percent accuracy. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Fisher exact test, with P values ≤ 0.05 thresholded for significance. Results: The expert majority correctly identified 59% of images as being real or synthetic (P = 0.1). Experts 1 to 4 correctly identified 54%, 58%, 49%, and 61% of images (P = 0.505, 0.158, 1.000, and 0.043, respectively). These results suggest that the majority of experts could not discern between real and synthetic images. Additionally, we identified 20 implementations of GANs in the ophthalmology literature, with applications in a variety of imaging modalities and ophthalmic diseases. Conclusions: Generative adversarial networks can create synthetic fundus images that are indiscernible from real fundus images by expert ROP ophthalmologists. Synthetic images may improve dataset augmentation for DL, may be used in trainee education, and may have implications for patient privacy.Jimmy S. Chen, MDAaron S. Coyner, PhDR.V. Paul Chan, MDM. Elizabeth Hartnett, MDDarius M. Moshfeghi, MDLeah A. Owen, MD, PhDJayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, PhDMichael F. Chiang, MD, MAJ. Peter Campbell, MD, MPHElsevierarticleDeep learningGenerative adversarial networksOphthalmologySynthetic imagesOphthalmologyRE1-994ENOphthalmology Science, Vol 1, Iss 4, Pp 100079- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Deep learning
Generative adversarial networks
Ophthalmology
Synthetic images
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Deep learning
Generative adversarial networks
Ophthalmology
Synthetic images
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Jimmy S. Chen, MD
Aaron S. Coyner, PhD
R.V. Paul Chan, MD
M. Elizabeth Hartnett, MD
Darius M. Moshfeghi, MD
Leah A. Owen, MD, PhD
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, PhD
Michael F. Chiang, MD, MA
J. Peter Campbell, MD, MPH
Deepfakes in Ophthalmology
description Purpose: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are deep learning (DL) models that can create and modify realistic-appearing synthetic images, or deepfakes, from real images. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of experts to discern synthesized retinal fundus images from real fundus images and to review the current uses and limitations of GANs in ophthalmology. Design: Development and expert evaluation of a GAN and an informal review of the literature. Participants: A total of 4282 image pairs of fundus images and retinal vessel maps acquired from a multicenter ROP screening program. Methods: Pix2Pix HD, a high-resolution GAN, was first trained and validated on fundus and vessel map image pairs and subsequently used to generate 880 images from a held-out test set. Fifty synthetic images from this test set and 50 different real images were presented to 4 expert ROP ophthalmologists using a custom online system for evaluation of whether the images were real or synthetic. Literature was reviewed on PubMed and Google Scholars using combinations of the terms ophthalmology, GANs, generative adversarial networks, ophthalmology, images, deepfakes, and synthetic. Ancestor search was performed to broaden results. Main Outcome Measures: Expert ability to discern real versus synthetic images was evaluated using percent accuracy. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Fisher exact test, with P values ≤ 0.05 thresholded for significance. Results: The expert majority correctly identified 59% of images as being real or synthetic (P = 0.1). Experts 1 to 4 correctly identified 54%, 58%, 49%, and 61% of images (P = 0.505, 0.158, 1.000, and 0.043, respectively). These results suggest that the majority of experts could not discern between real and synthetic images. Additionally, we identified 20 implementations of GANs in the ophthalmology literature, with applications in a variety of imaging modalities and ophthalmic diseases. Conclusions: Generative adversarial networks can create synthetic fundus images that are indiscernible from real fundus images by expert ROP ophthalmologists. Synthetic images may improve dataset augmentation for DL, may be used in trainee education, and may have implications for patient privacy.
format article
author Jimmy S. Chen, MD
Aaron S. Coyner, PhD
R.V. Paul Chan, MD
M. Elizabeth Hartnett, MD
Darius M. Moshfeghi, MD
Leah A. Owen, MD, PhD
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, PhD
Michael F. Chiang, MD, MA
J. Peter Campbell, MD, MPH
author_facet Jimmy S. Chen, MD
Aaron S. Coyner, PhD
R.V. Paul Chan, MD
M. Elizabeth Hartnett, MD
Darius M. Moshfeghi, MD
Leah A. Owen, MD, PhD
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, PhD
Michael F. Chiang, MD, MA
J. Peter Campbell, MD, MPH
author_sort Jimmy S. Chen, MD
title Deepfakes in Ophthalmology
title_short Deepfakes in Ophthalmology
title_full Deepfakes in Ophthalmology
title_fullStr Deepfakes in Ophthalmology
title_full_unstemmed Deepfakes in Ophthalmology
title_sort deepfakes in ophthalmology
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/724242de3b5f4588ac9b5f2db684fce5
work_keys_str_mv AT jimmyschenmd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT aaronscoynerphd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT rvpaulchanmd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT melizabethhartnettmd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT dariusmmoshfeghimd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT leahaowenmdphd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT jayashreekalpathycramerphd deepfakesinophthalmology
AT michaelfchiangmdma deepfakesinophthalmology
AT jpetercampbellmdmph deepfakesinophthalmology
_version_ 1718408266566860800