Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome
Abstract This study was aimed to compare the vascular healing process of a SYNERGY stent with that of a PROMUS PREMIER stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 71 patients with ACS, undergoing coronary stent implantation using the SYNERGY stent (n = 52) or PROMUS PREMIER stent (n = 1...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/726631f212c1473cbe22e5f119b7d5db |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:726631f212c1473cbe22e5f119b7d5db |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:726631f212c1473cbe22e5f119b7d5db2021-12-02T19:02:27ZMobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome10.1038/s41598-021-96730-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/726631f212c1473cbe22e5f119b7d5db2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96730-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study was aimed to compare the vascular healing process of a SYNERGY stent with that of a PROMUS PREMIER stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 71 patients with ACS, undergoing coronary stent implantation using the SYNERGY stent (n = 52) or PROMUS PREMIER stent (n = 19), we measured circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45null cells and CD34+/KDR+ cells and observed vascular healing at the stented sites using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy. On the day 7, circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45null cells increased in SYNERGY group (P < 0.0001), while it did not change in PROMUS group. The CD34+/KDR+ cells also increased in SYNERGY group (P < 0.0001) but less significantly in the PROMUS group (P < 0.05). The OCT-based neointimal thickness (P < 0.0005) and neointimal coverage rate (P < 0.05) at 12 months were greater in SYNERGY group, compared with PROMUS group. The coronary angioscopy-based neointimal coverage grade at 12 months was also greater in SYNERGY group (P < 0.001). In overall patients, the change in CD34+/KDR+ cells on the day 7 correlated with the OCT-based neointimal thickness at 12 months (R = 0.288, P < 0.05). SYNERGY stent seems to have potential advantages over PROMUS PREMIER stent for ACS patients in terms of vascular healing process at the stented sites.Masashi SakumaSetsu NishinoTakahisa NasunoMichiya KageyamaMichiaki TokuraRyoichi SohmaKen-ichi InoueTomoaki KanayaSyotaro ObiShigeru ToyodaShichiro AbeGuiherme F. AttizzaniGabriel T. R. PereiraHiram G. BezerraTeruo InoueNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Masashi Sakuma Setsu Nishino Takahisa Nasuno Michiya Kageyama Michiaki Tokura Ryoichi Sohma Ken-ichi Inoue Tomoaki Kanaya Syotaro Obi Shigeru Toyoda Shichiro Abe Guiherme F. Attizzani Gabriel T. R. Pereira Hiram G. Bezerra Teruo Inoue Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome |
description |
Abstract This study was aimed to compare the vascular healing process of a SYNERGY stent with that of a PROMUS PREMIER stent in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 71 patients with ACS, undergoing coronary stent implantation using the SYNERGY stent (n = 52) or PROMUS PREMIER stent (n = 19), we measured circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45null cells and CD34+/KDR+ cells and observed vascular healing at the stented sites using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy. On the day 7, circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45null cells increased in SYNERGY group (P < 0.0001), while it did not change in PROMUS group. The CD34+/KDR+ cells also increased in SYNERGY group (P < 0.0001) but less significantly in the PROMUS group (P < 0.05). The OCT-based neointimal thickness (P < 0.0005) and neointimal coverage rate (P < 0.05) at 12 months were greater in SYNERGY group, compared with PROMUS group. The coronary angioscopy-based neointimal coverage grade at 12 months was also greater in SYNERGY group (P < 0.001). In overall patients, the change in CD34+/KDR+ cells on the day 7 correlated with the OCT-based neointimal thickness at 12 months (R = 0.288, P < 0.05). SYNERGY stent seems to have potential advantages over PROMUS PREMIER stent for ACS patients in terms of vascular healing process at the stented sites. |
format |
article |
author |
Masashi Sakuma Setsu Nishino Takahisa Nasuno Michiya Kageyama Michiaki Tokura Ryoichi Sohma Ken-ichi Inoue Tomoaki Kanaya Syotaro Obi Shigeru Toyoda Shichiro Abe Guiherme F. Attizzani Gabriel T. R. Pereira Hiram G. Bezerra Teruo Inoue |
author_facet |
Masashi Sakuma Setsu Nishino Takahisa Nasuno Michiya Kageyama Michiaki Tokura Ryoichi Sohma Ken-ichi Inoue Tomoaki Kanaya Syotaro Obi Shigeru Toyoda Shichiro Abe Guiherme F. Attizzani Gabriel T. R. Pereira Hiram G. Bezerra Teruo Inoue |
author_sort |
Masashi Sakuma |
title |
Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome |
title_short |
Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome |
title_full |
Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome |
title_fullStr |
Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of SYNERGY in acute coronary syndrome |
title_sort |
mobilization of progenitor cells and vessel healing after implantation of synergy in acute coronary syndrome |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/726631f212c1473cbe22e5f119b7d5db |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT masashisakuma mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT setsunishino mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT takahisanasuno mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT michiyakageyama mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT michiakitokura mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT ryoichisohma mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT kenichiinoue mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT tomoakikanaya mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT syotaroobi mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT shigerutoyoda mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT shichiroabe mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT guihermefattizzani mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT gabrieltrpereira mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT hiramgbezerra mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome AT teruoinoue mobilizationofprogenitorcellsandvesselhealingafterimplantationofsynergyinacutecoronarysyndrome |
_version_ |
1718377272471191552 |