A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk

Injecting particles into atmosphere to reflect sunlight, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), represents a potential technological solution to the threat of climate change. But could the cure be worse than the disease? Understanding low probability, yet plausible, high-impact cases is critical to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aaron Tang, Luke Kemp
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7276396c8c424bd9b30f2bcdd6afe56c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7276396c8c424bd9b30f2bcdd6afe56c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7276396c8c424bd9b30f2bcdd6afe56c2021-11-19T07:52:20ZA Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk2624-955310.3389/fclim.2021.720312https://doaj.org/article/7276396c8c424bd9b30f2bcdd6afe56c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.720312/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2624-9553Injecting particles into atmosphere to reflect sunlight, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), represents a potential technological solution to the threat of climate change. But could the cure be worse than the disease? Understanding low probability, yet plausible, high-impact cases is critical to prudent climate risk management and SAI deliberation. But analyses of such high impact outcomes are lacking in SAI research. This paper helps resolve this gap by investigating SAI's contributions to global catastrophic risk. We split SAI's contributions to catastrophic risk into four interrelated dimensions:1. Acting as a direct catastrophic risk through potentially unforeseen ecological blowback.2. Interacting with other globally catastrophic hazards like nuclear war.3. Exacerbating systemic risk (risks that cascade and amplify across different systems);4. Acting as a latent risk (risk that is dormant but can later be triggered).The potential for major unforeseen environmental consequences seems highly unlikely but is ultimately unknown. SAI plausibly interacts with other catastrophic calamities, most notably by potentially exacerbating the impacts of nuclear war or an extreme space weather event. SAI could contribute to systemic risk by introducing stressors into critical systems such as agriculture. SAI's systemic stressors, and risks of systemic cascades and synchronous failures, are highly understudied. SAI deployment more tightly couples different ecological, economic, and political systems. This creates a precarious condition of latent risk, the largest cause for concern. Thicker SAI masking extreme warming could create a planetary Sword of Damocles. That is, if SAI were removed but underlying greenhouse gas concentrations not reduced, there would be extreme warming in a very short timeframe. Sufficiently large global shocks could force SAI termination and trigger SAI's latent risk, compounding disasters and catastrophic risks. Across all these dimensions, the specific SAI deployment, and associated governance, is critical. A well-coordinated use of a small amount of SAI would incur negligible risks, but this is an optimistic scenario. Conversely, larger use of SAI used in an uncoordinated manner poses many potential dangers. We cannot equivocally determine whether SAI will be worse than warming. For now, a heavy reliance on SAI seems an imprudent policy response.Aaron TangLuke KempFrontiers Media S.A.articleclimate engineeringstratospheric aerosol injectionglobal catastrophic riskgovernancesystemic risklatent riskEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENFrontiers in Climate, Vol 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic climate engineering
stratospheric aerosol injection
global catastrophic risk
governance
systemic risk
latent risk
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle climate engineering
stratospheric aerosol injection
global catastrophic risk
governance
systemic risk
latent risk
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Aaron Tang
Luke Kemp
A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
description Injecting particles into atmosphere to reflect sunlight, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), represents a potential technological solution to the threat of climate change. But could the cure be worse than the disease? Understanding low probability, yet plausible, high-impact cases is critical to prudent climate risk management and SAI deliberation. But analyses of such high impact outcomes are lacking in SAI research. This paper helps resolve this gap by investigating SAI's contributions to global catastrophic risk. We split SAI's contributions to catastrophic risk into four interrelated dimensions:1. Acting as a direct catastrophic risk through potentially unforeseen ecological blowback.2. Interacting with other globally catastrophic hazards like nuclear war.3. Exacerbating systemic risk (risks that cascade and amplify across different systems);4. Acting as a latent risk (risk that is dormant but can later be triggered).The potential for major unforeseen environmental consequences seems highly unlikely but is ultimately unknown. SAI plausibly interacts with other catastrophic calamities, most notably by potentially exacerbating the impacts of nuclear war or an extreme space weather event. SAI could contribute to systemic risk by introducing stressors into critical systems such as agriculture. SAI's systemic stressors, and risks of systemic cascades and synchronous failures, are highly understudied. SAI deployment more tightly couples different ecological, economic, and political systems. This creates a precarious condition of latent risk, the largest cause for concern. Thicker SAI masking extreme warming could create a planetary Sword of Damocles. That is, if SAI were removed but underlying greenhouse gas concentrations not reduced, there would be extreme warming in a very short timeframe. Sufficiently large global shocks could force SAI termination and trigger SAI's latent risk, compounding disasters and catastrophic risks. Across all these dimensions, the specific SAI deployment, and associated governance, is critical. A well-coordinated use of a small amount of SAI would incur negligible risks, but this is an optimistic scenario. Conversely, larger use of SAI used in an uncoordinated manner poses many potential dangers. We cannot equivocally determine whether SAI will be worse than warming. For now, a heavy reliance on SAI seems an imprudent policy response.
format article
author Aaron Tang
Luke Kemp
author_facet Aaron Tang
Luke Kemp
author_sort Aaron Tang
title A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
title_short A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
title_full A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
title_fullStr A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
title_full_unstemmed A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
title_sort fate worse than warming? stratospheric aerosol injection and global catastrophic risk
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7276396c8c424bd9b30f2bcdd6afe56c
work_keys_str_mv AT aarontang afateworsethanwarmingstratosphericaerosolinjectionandglobalcatastrophicrisk
AT lukekemp afateworsethanwarmingstratosphericaerosolinjectionandglobalcatastrophicrisk
AT aarontang fateworsethanwarmingstratosphericaerosolinjectionandglobalcatastrophicrisk
AT lukekemp fateworsethanwarmingstratosphericaerosolinjectionandglobalcatastrophicrisk
_version_ 1718420265269985280