‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics
Economic science has – lamented by some, applauded by others – turned into a monistic discipline. In this short research note, a socio-economic answer to the question of why this has happened is provided by combining an economic approach to the market for economic ideas with a sociological approach...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN FR |
Publicado: |
Editura ASE Bucuresti
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/72815f888c484e3f88009fa2a0910ae8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:72815f888c484e3f88009fa2a0910ae8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:72815f888c484e3f88009fa2a0910ae82021-12-02T06:59:39Z‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics1843-22981844-8208https://doaj.org/article/72815f888c484e3f88009fa2a0910ae82016-11-01T00:00:00Z https://jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=7693 https://doaj.org/toc/1843-2298https://doaj.org/toc/1844-8208Economic science has – lamented by some, applauded by others – turned into a monistic discipline. In this short research note, a socio-economic answer to the question of why this has happened is provided by combining an economic approach to the market for economic ideas with a sociological approach to a scientific (power) field.Arne HeiseEditura ASE BucurestiarticlepluralismmonismheterodoxystandardizationregulationEconomics as a scienceHB71-74DEENFRJournal of Philosophical Economics, Vol X, Iss 1, Pp 81-101 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
DE EN FR |
topic |
pluralism monism heterodoxy standardization regulation Economics as a science HB71-74 |
spellingShingle |
pluralism monism heterodoxy standardization regulation Economics as a science HB71-74 Arne Heise ‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
description |
Economic science has – lamented by some, applauded by others – turned into a monistic discipline. In this short research note, a socio-economic answer to the question of why this has happened is provided by combining an economic approach to the market for economic ideas with a sociological approach to a scientific (power) field. |
format |
article |
author |
Arne Heise |
author_facet |
Arne Heise |
author_sort |
Arne Heise |
title |
‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
title_short |
‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
title_full |
‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
title_fullStr |
‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
title_sort |
‘why has economics turned out this way?’ a socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics |
publisher |
Editura ASE Bucuresti |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/72815f888c484e3f88009fa2a0910ae8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arneheise whyhaseconomicsturnedoutthiswayasocioeconomicnoteontheexplanationofmonismineconomics |
_version_ |
1718399639258923008 |