Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies

There are various ways of reducing conflicts and of stabilizing the political situation in states where society is made up of many different ethnic groups and religious communities, and where relations between these segments – or between them and the central government – are tense. A particularly i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Krzysztof Trzciński
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2019
Materias:	power sharing hybrid power sharing consociational centripetal Nigeria Indonesia Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/72f02ca2b6184e5c9709f00c8e73463a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:72f02ca2b6184e5c9709f00c8e73463a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:72f02ca2b6184e5c9709f00c8e73463a2021-11-27T13:14:00ZHybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.56.061733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/72f02ca2b6184e5c9709f00c8e73463a2019-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/873https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 There are various ways of reducing conflicts and of stabilizing the political situation in states where society is made up of many different ethnic groups and religious communities, and where relations between these segments – or between them and the central government – are tense. A particularly important way is the establishment in those states of a political system based on power-sharing (PS), which allows members of various ethnic and religious segments to take part in the exercise of power. The literature on the subject usually discusses two models of PS: consociationalism and centripetalism. A third model is encountered in practice, however, that of hybrid power-sharing (HPS), which combines the institutions of the first two. The main objective of this article is to explain the nature and origins of HPS. As examples, I will use the political systems of Nigeria and Indonesia. In the first part of the article I explain briefly the nature of PS, and of its two main models; in the second I explain what HPS is; in the third I analyze the emergence of HPS, and give the causes of the inclusion of consociational institutions in political systems in which centripetal institutions are dominant, using the cases of Nigeria and Indonesia; I draw conclusions in the final part. Krzysztof TrzcińskiKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlepower sharinghybrid power sharingconsociationalcentripetalNigeriaIndonesiaLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 15, Iss 5(56) (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	power sharing hybrid power sharing consociational centripetal Nigeria Indonesia Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	power sharing hybrid power sharing consociational centripetal Nigeria Indonesia Law K Political science J Krzysztof Trzciński Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies
description	There are various ways of reducing conflicts and of stabilizing the political situation in states where society is made up of many different ethnic groups and religious communities, and where relations between these segments – or between them and the central government – are tense. A particularly important way is the establishment in those states of a political system based on power-sharing (PS), which allows members of various ethnic and religious segments to take part in the exercise of power. The literature on the subject usually discusses two models of PS: consociationalism and centripetalism. A third model is encountered in practice, however, that of hybrid power-sharing (HPS), which combines the institutions of the first two. The main objective of this article is to explain the nature and origins of HPS. As examples, I will use the political systems of Nigeria and Indonesia. In the first part of the article I explain briefly the nature of PS, and of its two main models; in the second I explain what HPS is; in the third I analyze the emergence of HPS, and give the causes of the inclusion of consociational institutions in political systems in which centripetal institutions are dominant, using the cases of Nigeria and Indonesia; I draw conclusions in the final part.
format	article
author	Krzysztof Trzciński
author_facet	Krzysztof Trzciński
author_sort	Krzysztof Trzciński
title	Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies
title_short	Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies
title_full	Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies
title_fullStr	Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies
title_full_unstemmed	Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies
title_sort	hybrid power sharing: on how to stabilize the political situation in multi-segmental societies
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/72f02ca2b6184e5c9709f00c8e73463a
work_keys_str_mv	AT krzysztoftrzcinski hybridpowersharingonhowtostabilizethepoliticalsituationinmultisegmentalsocieties
_version_	1718408629021835264

Hybrid Power Sharing: On How to Stabilize the Political Situation in Multi-segmental Societies

Ejemplares similares