Effects of biaxial tensile mechanical properties and non-integer exponent on description accuracy of anisotropic yield behavior
It is necessary to identify differences among biaxial tensile mechanical properties to describe the plastic anisotropy and potential adjustment ability of yield criteria with the non-integer exponent for the yield surface. Therefore, in this study, uniaxial and cruciform biaxial tensile tests were p...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7323058a20f04713a2282c40182e268c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | It is necessary to identify differences among biaxial tensile mechanical properties to describe the plastic anisotropy and potential adjustment ability of yield criteria with the non-integer exponent for the yield surface. Therefore, in this study, uniaxial and cruciform biaxial tensile tests were performed under 17 different loading paths: uniaxial tension in seven different directions, cruciform biaxial tension in rolling/transverse and 45°/135° sampling directions with seven and three different stress ratios, respectively. Based on the BBC2008 yield criterion, the uniaxial yield stresses, rθ-values, yield loci on the normal plane, and shear yield loci on the diagonal plane, predicted using six parameter identification strategies, were quantitatively evaluated for MP980, DP490, 6016-T4, and 5182-O. Results show the constraining and regulation ability of the equi-biaxial tensile data for yield loci to be better than that of near-plane strain state data. The parameter identification strategy considering the non-integer exponent was observed to significantly improved the ability of the yield criterion to describe the anisotropic yield behavior. For a simplified evaluation system that considers only the prediction accuracy of the yield locus under the principal stress state, neglecting the prediction accuracy for the shear yield locus may lead to incorrect judgments regarding the best identification strategy. |
---|