Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Garamond&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Quirine Eijkman, Bibi van Ginkel
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Amsterdam Law Forum 2012
Materias:	Intelligence, fair trial, terrorist trials Law K
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/735b18450bec4a9ab0b79e99a9fae125
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:735b18450bec4a9ab0b79e99a9fae125
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:735b18450bec4a9ab0b79e99a9fae1252021-12-02T01:05:39ZCompatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/735b18450bec4a9ab0b79e99a9fae1252012-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/239https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Garamond&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB">This article focuses on the special criminal procedures for the use of intelligence in terrorism-related court cases in Canada, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Since 9/11 and the terror attacks in London and Madrid, both gathering intelligence as well as the prosecution of suspects of terrorist crimes have become strategic tools in countering terrorism. By reviewing the special procedures for the use of intelligence in terrorist trials, their compatibility with human rights standards, including the right to fair trial, is discussed. Among others concerns include: the extent to which disclosure is made possible and to who. The differences in criminal procedures for the use of intelligence in terrorist trials raise questions when intelligence information origins from a third state, in which different regulations with regard to disclosure of information apply.</span><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Sansation; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"> </span></strong></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Garamond&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>Quirine EijkmanBibi van GinkelAmsterdam Law ForumarticleIntelligence, fair trial, terrorist trialsLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 3-16 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Intelligence, fair trial, terrorist trials Law K
spellingShingle	Intelligence, fair trial, terrorist trials Law K Quirine Eijkman Bibi van Ginkel Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
description	<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Garamond&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB">This article focuses on the special criminal procedures for the use of intelligence in terrorism-related court cases in Canada, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Since 9/11 and the terror attacks in London and Madrid, both gathering intelligence as well as the prosecution of suspects of terrorist crimes have become strategic tools in countering terrorism. By reviewing the special procedures for the use of intelligence in terrorist trials, their compatibility with human rights standards, including the right to fair trial, is discussed. Among others concerns include: the extent to which disclosure is made possible and to who. The differences in criminal procedures for the use of intelligence in terrorist trials raise questions when intelligence information origins from a third state, in which different regulations with regard to disclosure of information apply.</span><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Sansation; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"> </span></strong></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Garamond&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>
format	article
author	Quirine Eijkman Bibi van Ginkel
author_facet	Quirine Eijkman Bibi van Ginkel
author_sort	Quirine Eijkman
title	Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
title_short	Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
title_full	Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
title_fullStr	Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
title_full_unstemmed	Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
title_sort	compatible or incompatible?: intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials
publisher	Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/735b18450bec4a9ab0b79e99a9fae125
work_keys_str_mv	AT quirineeijkman compatibleorincompatibleintelligenceandhumanrightsinterroristtrials AT bibivanginkel compatibleorincompatibleintelligenceandhumanrightsinterroristtrials
_version_	1718403322797359104

Compatible or incompatible?: Intelligence and human rights in terrorist trials

Ejemplares similares