IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets
Gorobets (Wild fauna conservation: IUCN-CITES match is required. Ecol. Indic. 112 (2020), 106091) has recently proposed to increase the effectiveness of species protection by maximizing the overlap of the IUCN Red List and CITES Appendices. This would increase the number of animal species in CITES A...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | , |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/738fb9f8e8204b99a6616b088d5fe76a |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:738fb9f8e8204b99a6616b088d5fe76a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:738fb9f8e8204b99a6616b088d5fe76a2021-12-01T04:54:20ZIUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107842https://doaj.org/article/738fb9f8e8204b99a6616b088d5fe76a2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21005070https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XGorobets (Wild fauna conservation: IUCN-CITES match is required. Ecol. Indic. 112 (2020), 106091) has recently proposed to increase the effectiveness of species protection by maximizing the overlap of the IUCN Red List and CITES Appendices. This would increase the number of animal species in CITES Appendices by 229%. We consider this unnecessary or even counterproductive, because these lists are based on different protection rules and objectives.Michal BerecIrena ŠetlíkováElsevierarticleWildlifeFaunaConservationTradeIUCNCITESEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 128, Iss , Pp 107842- (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Wildlife Fauna Conservation Trade IUCN CITES Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
Wildlife Fauna Conservation Trade IUCN CITES Ecology QH540-549.5 Michal Berec Irena Šetlíková IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets |
description |
Gorobets (Wild fauna conservation: IUCN-CITES match is required. Ecol. Indic. 112 (2020), 106091) has recently proposed to increase the effectiveness of species protection by maximizing the overlap of the IUCN Red List and CITES Appendices. This would increase the number of animal species in CITES Appendices by 229%. We consider this unnecessary or even counterproductive, because these lists are based on different protection rules and objectives. |
format |
article |
author |
Michal Berec Irena Šetlíková |
author_facet |
Michal Berec Irena Šetlíková |
author_sort |
Michal Berec |
title |
IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets |
title_short |
IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets |
title_full |
IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets |
title_fullStr |
IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets |
title_full_unstemmed |
IUCN-CITES match is not required: A reply to Gorobets |
title_sort |
iucn-cites match is not required: a reply to gorobets |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/738fb9f8e8204b99a6616b088d5fe76a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michalberec iucncitesmatchisnotrequiredareplytogorobets AT irenasetlikova iucncitesmatchisnotrequiredareplytogorobets |
_version_ |
1718405668203921408 |