Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil

The implementation of affirmative action politics for black students in the Brazilian public universities has generated an intense debate in several social spheres. The discussions on the affi rmative action politics have not only mobilized organized actors of the Brazilian civil society as well as...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Karine Pereira Goss
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	PT
Publicado:	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2009
Materias:	affirmative action black students intellectuals progressive rhetoric rhetorical conservative Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/73986ddbb5f543f682d1311f02ee6197
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:73986ddbb5f543f682d1311f02ee6197
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:73986ddbb5f543f682d1311f02ee61972021-11-11T15:41:58ZRetóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil2177-6229https://doaj.org/article/73986ddbb5f543f682d1311f02ee61972009-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93812726003https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6229The implementation of affirmative action politics for black students in the Brazilian public universities has generated an intense debate in several social spheres. The discussions on the affi rmative action politics have not only mobilized organized actors of the Brazilian civil society as well as the national intelligentsia. In parallel to the debate installed in the media from 2002, an academic dispute around the subject was also initiated. To understand the reason of the dispute between the Brazilian intellectuals on the necessity or not of these politics application constitute the main objective of the research. For this, the main proposals presented for social scientists, more specifi cally anthropology and sociology representatives will be analyzed. It has at least two well demarcated positions in social sciences regarding the subject: intellectuals contrary to the affirmative action politics and those favorable of. Their arguments will be analyzed from a typology created for Albert Hirschman (1992). The authors who develop arguments in opposition to the affirmative actions are partisan of a called rhetoric of conservative, while the ones that defend such politics are classified as partisan of a progressive rhetoric. Hirschman delimits three thesis of the rhetorical conservative that have been elaborated by intellectuals, many of them social scientists, at different times, evaluating politics as progressive and/or reformist: the thesis of perversity, the thesis of futility and the thesis of threat. For each thesis of the rhetorical conservative, the author elaborates progressive counterparts, originating pairs that oppose and complement each other. It is possible to conclude that the two rhetorics in shock reflect differentiated positions of intellectuals in relation to science and politics. Moreover, the partisans of the two rhetorics share diverse conceptions regarding important concepts used in Brazilian social sciences, "race" and of "mestization". As much as the entailing of the intellectuals to science and the theoretical matrices they use to explain the nation lies on their relative different positioning to the affi rmative action implementation for black students in Brazil.Karine Pereira GossUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)articleaffirmative actionblack studentsintellectualsprogressive rhetoricrhetorical conservativeSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99PTCiências Sociais Unisinos, Vol 45, Iss 2, Pp 114-124 (2009)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	PT
topic	affirmative action black students intellectuals progressive rhetoric rhetorical conservative Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	affirmative action black students intellectuals progressive rhetoric rhetorical conservative Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Karine Pereira Goss Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil
description	The implementation of affirmative action politics for black students in the Brazilian public universities has generated an intense debate in several social spheres. The discussions on the affi rmative action politics have not only mobilized organized actors of the Brazilian civil society as well as the national intelligentsia. In parallel to the debate installed in the media from 2002, an academic dispute around the subject was also initiated. To understand the reason of the dispute between the Brazilian intellectuals on the necessity or not of these politics application constitute the main objective of the research. For this, the main proposals presented for social scientists, more specifi cally anthropology and sociology representatives will be analyzed. It has at least two well demarcated positions in social sciences regarding the subject: intellectuals contrary to the affirmative action politics and those favorable of. Their arguments will be analyzed from a typology created for Albert Hirschman (1992). The authors who develop arguments in opposition to the affirmative actions are partisan of a called rhetoric of conservative, while the ones that defend such politics are classified as partisan of a progressive rhetoric. Hirschman delimits three thesis of the rhetorical conservative that have been elaborated by intellectuals, many of them social scientists, at different times, evaluating politics as progressive and/or reformist: the thesis of perversity, the thesis of futility and the thesis of threat. For each thesis of the rhetorical conservative, the author elaborates progressive counterparts, originating pairs that oppose and complement each other. It is possible to conclude that the two rhetorics in shock reflect differentiated positions of intellectuals in relation to science and politics. Moreover, the partisans of the two rhetorics share diverse conceptions regarding important concepts used in Brazilian social sciences, "race" and of "mestization". As much as the entailing of the intellectuals to science and the theoretical matrices they use to explain the nation lies on their relative different positioning to the affi rmative action implementation for black students in Brazil.
format	article
author	Karine Pereira Goss
author_facet	Karine Pereira Goss
author_sort	Karine Pereira Goss
title	Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil
title_short	Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil
title_full	Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil
title_fullStr	Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed	Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil
title_sort	retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no brasil
publisher	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
publishDate	2009
url	https://doaj.org/article/73986ddbb5f543f682d1311f02ee6197
work_keys_str_mv	AT karinepereiragoss retoricasemdisputaodebateintelectualsobreaspoliticasdeacaoafirmativaparaestudantesnegrosnobrasil
_version_	1718434153984163840

Retóricas em disputa: o debate intelectual sobre as políticas de ação afirmativa para estudantes negros no Brasil

Ejemplares similares