Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke

Introduction: There is growing evidence supporting the relationship of vertical misperception and poor balance control with asymmetrical standing posture in patients with stroke. Although the vestibular system has been shown to be responsible for vertical misperception and balance disorders, the eff...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takamichi Tohyama, Kunitsugu Kondo, Yohei Otaka
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/73a8a14477d14b598cc945f479616bb1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:73a8a14477d14b598cc945f479616bb1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:73a8a14477d14b598cc945f479616bb12021-11-11T05:05:29ZEffects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke1664-229510.3389/fneur.2021.768663https://doaj.org/article/73a8a14477d14b598cc945f479616bb12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.768663/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-2295Introduction: There is growing evidence supporting the relationship of vertical misperception and poor balance control with asymmetrical standing posture in patients with stroke. Although the vestibular system has been shown to be responsible for vertical misperception and balance disorders, the effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on both vertical misperception and postural asymmetry after stroke remains elusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GVS on visual verticality and postural asymmetry after stroke and to clarify whether the effects differ depending on the polarity of the stimulation and hemispheric lesion side.Methods: We measured the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and body weight distribution on each foot in an upright stance in 24 patients with a hemispheric stroke (10 with a left hemisphere lesion and 14 with a right hemisphere lesion) and nine age-matched healthy controls. During the measurements, bipolar GVS (1.5 mA) was applied over the bilateral mastoid processes in three stimulation conditions: contralesional-anodal and ipsilesional-cathodal vestibular stimulation, ipsilesional-anodal and contralesional-cathodal vestibular stimulation, and no stimulation. To examine whether GVS modulates visual verticality and standing posture, SVV and weight-bearing in the three conditions were analyzed.Results: During no stimulation, the SVV deviated to the contralesional side in patients with a right hemisphere lesion, while more weight-bearing was observed on the ipsilesional limb than on the contralesional limb in both patient groups than in the controls. The SVV was modulated by reversing the polarity of GVS in all the groups when the cathodal stimulus side was either ipsilateral or contralateral to the lesion while the ipsilesional-cathodal vestibular stimulation reduced weight-bearing asymmetry in only the patients with a right hemisphere lesion.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the effects of GVS on the SVV and standing posture differ depending on the polarity of GVS and the hemispheric lesion side. Patients with a right hemisphere lesion have difficulty maintaining their preferred standing posture under visual verticality modulation evoked by GVS. The application of GVS may clarify whether the vestibular system has neural redundancy after stroke to suppress any effects of the stimulation, including modulation of the visual verticality, on balance.Takamichi TohyamaTakamichi TohyamaKunitsugu KondoYohei OtakaYohei OtakaFrontiers Media S.A.articlecerebrovascular disorderhemiparesispostural balancesubjective visual verticalvestibular controlNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENFrontiers in Neurology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cerebrovascular disorder
hemiparesis
postural balance
subjective visual vertical
vestibular control
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle cerebrovascular disorder
hemiparesis
postural balance
subjective visual vertical
vestibular control
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Takamichi Tohyama
Takamichi Tohyama
Kunitsugu Kondo
Yohei Otaka
Yohei Otaka
Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke
description Introduction: There is growing evidence supporting the relationship of vertical misperception and poor balance control with asymmetrical standing posture in patients with stroke. Although the vestibular system has been shown to be responsible for vertical misperception and balance disorders, the effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on both vertical misperception and postural asymmetry after stroke remains elusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GVS on visual verticality and postural asymmetry after stroke and to clarify whether the effects differ depending on the polarity of the stimulation and hemispheric lesion side.Methods: We measured the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and body weight distribution on each foot in an upright stance in 24 patients with a hemispheric stroke (10 with a left hemisphere lesion and 14 with a right hemisphere lesion) and nine age-matched healthy controls. During the measurements, bipolar GVS (1.5 mA) was applied over the bilateral mastoid processes in three stimulation conditions: contralesional-anodal and ipsilesional-cathodal vestibular stimulation, ipsilesional-anodal and contralesional-cathodal vestibular stimulation, and no stimulation. To examine whether GVS modulates visual verticality and standing posture, SVV and weight-bearing in the three conditions were analyzed.Results: During no stimulation, the SVV deviated to the contralesional side in patients with a right hemisphere lesion, while more weight-bearing was observed on the ipsilesional limb than on the contralesional limb in both patient groups than in the controls. The SVV was modulated by reversing the polarity of GVS in all the groups when the cathodal stimulus side was either ipsilateral or contralateral to the lesion while the ipsilesional-cathodal vestibular stimulation reduced weight-bearing asymmetry in only the patients with a right hemisphere lesion.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the effects of GVS on the SVV and standing posture differ depending on the polarity of GVS and the hemispheric lesion side. Patients with a right hemisphere lesion have difficulty maintaining their preferred standing posture under visual verticality modulation evoked by GVS. The application of GVS may clarify whether the vestibular system has neural redundancy after stroke to suppress any effects of the stimulation, including modulation of the visual verticality, on balance.
format article
author Takamichi Tohyama
Takamichi Tohyama
Kunitsugu Kondo
Yohei Otaka
Yohei Otaka
author_facet Takamichi Tohyama
Takamichi Tohyama
Kunitsugu Kondo
Yohei Otaka
Yohei Otaka
author_sort Takamichi Tohyama
title Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke
title_short Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke
title_full Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke
title_fullStr Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visual Verticality and Standing Posture Differ Based on the Polarity of the Stimulation and Hemispheric Lesion Side in Patients With Stroke
title_sort effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on visual verticality and standing posture differ based on the polarity of the stimulation and hemispheric lesion side in patients with stroke
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/73a8a14477d14b598cc945f479616bb1
work_keys_str_mv AT takamichitohyama effectsofgalvanicvestibularstimulationonvisualverticalityandstandingposturedifferbasedonthepolarityofthestimulationandhemisphericlesionsideinpatientswithstroke
AT takamichitohyama effectsofgalvanicvestibularstimulationonvisualverticalityandstandingposturedifferbasedonthepolarityofthestimulationandhemisphericlesionsideinpatientswithstroke
AT kunitsugukondo effectsofgalvanicvestibularstimulationonvisualverticalityandstandingposturedifferbasedonthepolarityofthestimulationandhemisphericlesionsideinpatientswithstroke
AT yoheiotaka effectsofgalvanicvestibularstimulationonvisualverticalityandstandingposturedifferbasedonthepolarityofthestimulationandhemisphericlesionsideinpatientswithstroke
AT yoheiotaka effectsofgalvanicvestibularstimulationonvisualverticalityandstandingposturedifferbasedonthepolarityofthestimulationandhemisphericlesionsideinpatientswithstroke
_version_ 1718439595675222016