The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
Abstract In order to develop effective public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy weight development, identifying the interventions/combination of interventions with the highest beneficial effect on body weight is vital. The study aimed to estimate the mean BMI at age 13 under hypothetical...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb23 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb23 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb232021-12-02T14:49:11ZThe impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence10.1038/s41598-021-90415-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb232021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90415-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In order to develop effective public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy weight development, identifying the interventions/combination of interventions with the highest beneficial effect on body weight is vital. The study aimed to estimate the mean BMI at age 13 under hypothetical interventions targeting dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time at age 11. We used data from a school-based cohort study of 530 participants followed between the ages of 11 and 13. We used g-computation, a causal modeling method, to estimate the impact of single and combined hypothetical behavioral interventions at age 11 on BMI at age 13. Of the hypothetical interventions, the one with the largest population mean difference in BMI was the one combining all interventions (dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time interventions) and assuming 100% intervention adherence, with a population mean differences of − 0.28 (95% CI − 0.59, 0.07). Isolated behavioral interventions had a limited impact on BMI. This study demonstrated that a combination of healthy dietary behavior and physical activity promotion, as well as screen time reduction interventions at age 11 could have the highest beneficial effect on the reduction of BMI at age 13, although the change in BMI was small. The findings highlight the importance of a systems approach to obesity prevention focusing on multicomponent interventions.Mekdes K. GebremariamRoch A. NianogoNanna LienMona BjellandKnut-Inge KleppIngunn H. BerghYngvar OmmundsenOnyebuchi A. ArahNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Mekdes K. Gebremariam Roch A. Nianogo Nanna Lien Mona Bjelland Knut-Inge Klepp Ingunn H. Bergh Yngvar Ommundsen Onyebuchi A. Arah The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
description |
Abstract In order to develop effective public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy weight development, identifying the interventions/combination of interventions with the highest beneficial effect on body weight is vital. The study aimed to estimate the mean BMI at age 13 under hypothetical interventions targeting dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time at age 11. We used data from a school-based cohort study of 530 participants followed between the ages of 11 and 13. We used g-computation, a causal modeling method, to estimate the impact of single and combined hypothetical behavioral interventions at age 11 on BMI at age 13. Of the hypothetical interventions, the one with the largest population mean difference in BMI was the one combining all interventions (dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time interventions) and assuming 100% intervention adherence, with a population mean differences of − 0.28 (95% CI − 0.59, 0.07). Isolated behavioral interventions had a limited impact on BMI. This study demonstrated that a combination of healthy dietary behavior and physical activity promotion, as well as screen time reduction interventions at age 11 could have the highest beneficial effect on the reduction of BMI at age 13, although the change in BMI was small. The findings highlight the importance of a systems approach to obesity prevention focusing on multicomponent interventions. |
format |
article |
author |
Mekdes K. Gebremariam Roch A. Nianogo Nanna Lien Mona Bjelland Knut-Inge Klepp Ingunn H. Bergh Yngvar Ommundsen Onyebuchi A. Arah |
author_facet |
Mekdes K. Gebremariam Roch A. Nianogo Nanna Lien Mona Bjelland Knut-Inge Klepp Ingunn H. Bergh Yngvar Ommundsen Onyebuchi A. Arah |
author_sort |
Mekdes K. Gebremariam |
title |
The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
title_short |
The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
title_full |
The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
title_fullStr |
The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
title_sort |
impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb23 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mekdeskgebremariam theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT rochanianogo theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT nannalien theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT monabjelland theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT knutingeklepp theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT ingunnhbergh theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT yngvarommundsen theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT onyebuchiaarah theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT mekdeskgebremariam impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT rochanianogo impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT nannalien impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT monabjelland impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT knutingeklepp impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT ingunnhbergh impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT yngvarommundsen impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence AT onyebuchiaarah impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence |
_version_ |
1718389516805341184 |