The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence

Abstract In order to develop effective public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy weight development, identifying the interventions/combination of interventions with the highest beneficial effect on body weight is vital. The study aimed to estimate the mean BMI at age 13 under hypothetical...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mekdes K. Gebremariam, Roch A. Nianogo, Nanna Lien, Mona Bjelland, Knut-Inge Klepp, Ingunn H. Bergh, Yngvar Ommundsen, Onyebuchi A. Arah
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb23
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb23
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb232021-12-02T14:49:11ZThe impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence10.1038/s41598-021-90415-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb232021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90415-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In order to develop effective public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy weight development, identifying the interventions/combination of interventions with the highest beneficial effect on body weight is vital. The study aimed to estimate the mean BMI at age 13 under hypothetical interventions targeting dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time at age 11. We used data from a school-based cohort study of 530 participants followed between the ages of 11 and 13. We used g-computation, a causal modeling method, to estimate the impact of single and combined hypothetical behavioral interventions at age 11 on BMI at age 13. Of the hypothetical interventions, the one with the largest population mean difference in BMI was the one combining all interventions (dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time interventions) and assuming 100% intervention adherence, with a population mean differences of − 0.28 (95% CI − 0.59, 0.07). Isolated behavioral interventions had a limited impact on BMI. This study demonstrated that a combination of healthy dietary behavior and physical activity promotion, as well as screen time reduction interventions at age 11 could have the highest beneficial effect on the reduction of BMI at age 13, although the change in BMI was small. The findings highlight the importance of a systems approach to obesity prevention focusing on multicomponent interventions.Mekdes K. GebremariamRoch A. NianogoNanna LienMona BjellandKnut-Inge KleppIngunn H. BerghYngvar OmmundsenOnyebuchi A. ArahNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Mekdes K. Gebremariam
Roch A. Nianogo
Nanna Lien
Mona Bjelland
Knut-Inge Klepp
Ingunn H. Bergh
Yngvar Ommundsen
Onyebuchi A. Arah
The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
description Abstract In order to develop effective public health initiatives aimed at promoting healthy weight development, identifying the interventions/combination of interventions with the highest beneficial effect on body weight is vital. The study aimed to estimate the mean BMI at age 13 under hypothetical interventions targeting dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time at age 11. We used data from a school-based cohort study of 530 participants followed between the ages of 11 and 13. We used g-computation, a causal modeling method, to estimate the impact of single and combined hypothetical behavioral interventions at age 11 on BMI at age 13. Of the hypothetical interventions, the one with the largest population mean difference in BMI was the one combining all interventions (dietary behavior, physical activity and screen time interventions) and assuming 100% intervention adherence, with a population mean differences of − 0.28 (95% CI − 0.59, 0.07). Isolated behavioral interventions had a limited impact on BMI. This study demonstrated that a combination of healthy dietary behavior and physical activity promotion, as well as screen time reduction interventions at age 11 could have the highest beneficial effect on the reduction of BMI at age 13, although the change in BMI was small. The findings highlight the importance of a systems approach to obesity prevention focusing on multicomponent interventions.
format article
author Mekdes K. Gebremariam
Roch A. Nianogo
Nanna Lien
Mona Bjelland
Knut-Inge Klepp
Ingunn H. Bergh
Yngvar Ommundsen
Onyebuchi A. Arah
author_facet Mekdes K. Gebremariam
Roch A. Nianogo
Nanna Lien
Mona Bjelland
Knut-Inge Klepp
Ingunn H. Bergh
Yngvar Ommundsen
Onyebuchi A. Arah
author_sort Mekdes K. Gebremariam
title The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
title_short The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
title_full The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
title_fullStr The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
title_full_unstemmed The impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
title_sort impact of hypothetical interventions on adiposity in adolescence
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/741c38c09d48485fb8b89621bb97eb23
work_keys_str_mv AT mekdeskgebremariam theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT rochanianogo theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT nannalien theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT monabjelland theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT knutingeklepp theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT ingunnhbergh theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT yngvarommundsen theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT onyebuchiaarah theimpactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT mekdeskgebremariam impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT rochanianogo impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT nannalien impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT monabjelland impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT knutingeklepp impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT ingunnhbergh impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT yngvarommundsen impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
AT onyebuchiaarah impactofhypotheticalinterventionsonadiposityinadolescence
_version_ 1718389516805341184