Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression

Abstract Background The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberto Benussi, Nicholas J. Ashton, Thomas K. Karikari, Antonella Alberici, Claudia Saraceno, Roberta Ghidoni, Luisa Benussi, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Barbara Borroni
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be32021-11-21T12:40:24ZProdromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression10.1186/s13195-021-00932-21758-9193https://doaj.org/article/7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2https://doaj.org/toc/1758-9193Abstract Background The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NACC FTLD. Prodromal FTD was defined to reflect mild cognitive or behavioural impairment with relatively preserved functional independence (global CDR plus NACC = 0.5) as well as mild, moderate and severe dementia (classified as global CDR plus NACC = 1, 2, 3, respectively). Disease progression at 1-year follow-up and serum NfL measurements were acquired in a subgroup of patients. Results Of 563 participants, 138 were classified as prodromal FTD, 130 as mild, 175 as moderate and 120 as severe FTD. In the prodromal and mild phases, we observed an early increase in serum NfL levels followed by behavioural disturbances and deficits in executive functions. Negative symptoms, such as apathy, inflexibility and loss of insight, predominated in the prodromal phase. Serum NfL levels were significantly increased in the prodromal phase compared with healthy controls (average difference 14.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 26.1 pg/mL), but lower than in patients with mild FTD (average difference -15.5, 95% CI -28.4 to -2.7 pg/mL). At 1-year follow-up, 51.2% of patients in the prodromal phase had converted to dementia. Serum NfL measurements at baseline were the strongest predictors of disease progression at 1-year follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p < 0.001). Conclusions Prodromal FTD is a mutable stage with high rate of progression to fully symptomatic disease at 1-year follow-up. High serum NfL levels may support prodromal FTD diagnosis and represent a helpful marker to assess disease progression.Alberto BenussiNicholas J. AshtonThomas K. KarikariAntonella AlbericiClaudia SaracenoRoberta GhidoniLuisa BenussiHenrik ZetterbergKaj BlennowBarbara BorroniBMCarticleFrontotemporal dementiaSerum neurofilament lightProdromalMildProgressionConversionNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENAlzheimer’s Research & Therapy, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Frontotemporal dementia
Serum neurofilament light
Prodromal
Mild
Progression
Conversion
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Frontotemporal dementia
Serum neurofilament light
Prodromal
Mild
Progression
Conversion
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Alberto Benussi
Nicholas J. Ashton
Thomas K. Karikari
Antonella Alberici
Claudia Saraceno
Roberta Ghidoni
Luisa Benussi
Henrik Zetterberg
Kaj Blennow
Barbara Borroni
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
description Abstract Background The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NACC FTLD. Prodromal FTD was defined to reflect mild cognitive or behavioural impairment with relatively preserved functional independence (global CDR plus NACC = 0.5) as well as mild, moderate and severe dementia (classified as global CDR plus NACC = 1, 2, 3, respectively). Disease progression at 1-year follow-up and serum NfL measurements were acquired in a subgroup of patients. Results Of 563 participants, 138 were classified as prodromal FTD, 130 as mild, 175 as moderate and 120 as severe FTD. In the prodromal and mild phases, we observed an early increase in serum NfL levels followed by behavioural disturbances and deficits in executive functions. Negative symptoms, such as apathy, inflexibility and loss of insight, predominated in the prodromal phase. Serum NfL levels were significantly increased in the prodromal phase compared with healthy controls (average difference 14.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 26.1 pg/mL), but lower than in patients with mild FTD (average difference -15.5, 95% CI -28.4 to -2.7 pg/mL). At 1-year follow-up, 51.2% of patients in the prodromal phase had converted to dementia. Serum NfL measurements at baseline were the strongest predictors of disease progression at 1-year follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p < 0.001). Conclusions Prodromal FTD is a mutable stage with high rate of progression to fully symptomatic disease at 1-year follow-up. High serum NfL levels may support prodromal FTD diagnosis and represent a helpful marker to assess disease progression.
format article
author Alberto Benussi
Nicholas J. Ashton
Thomas K. Karikari
Antonella Alberici
Claudia Saraceno
Roberta Ghidoni
Luisa Benussi
Henrik Zetterberg
Kaj Blennow
Barbara Borroni
author_facet Alberto Benussi
Nicholas J. Ashton
Thomas K. Karikari
Antonella Alberici
Claudia Saraceno
Roberta Ghidoni
Luisa Benussi
Henrik Zetterberg
Kaj Blennow
Barbara Borroni
author_sort Alberto Benussi
title Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
title_short Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
title_full Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
title_fullStr Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
title_full_unstemmed Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
title_sort prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be3
work_keys_str_mv AT albertobenussi prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT nicholasjashton prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT thomaskkarikari prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT antonellaalberici prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT claudiasaraceno prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT robertaghidoni prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT luisabenussi prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT henrikzetterberg prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT kajblennow prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
AT barbaraborroni prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression
_version_ 1718418891219140608