Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
Abstract Background The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be32021-11-21T12:40:24ZProdromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression10.1186/s13195-021-00932-21758-9193https://doaj.org/article/7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2https://doaj.org/toc/1758-9193Abstract Background The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NACC FTLD. Prodromal FTD was defined to reflect mild cognitive or behavioural impairment with relatively preserved functional independence (global CDR plus NACC = 0.5) as well as mild, moderate and severe dementia (classified as global CDR plus NACC = 1, 2, 3, respectively). Disease progression at 1-year follow-up and serum NfL measurements were acquired in a subgroup of patients. Results Of 563 participants, 138 were classified as prodromal FTD, 130 as mild, 175 as moderate and 120 as severe FTD. In the prodromal and mild phases, we observed an early increase in serum NfL levels followed by behavioural disturbances and deficits in executive functions. Negative symptoms, such as apathy, inflexibility and loss of insight, predominated in the prodromal phase. Serum NfL levels were significantly increased in the prodromal phase compared with healthy controls (average difference 14.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 26.1 pg/mL), but lower than in patients with mild FTD (average difference -15.5, 95% CI -28.4 to -2.7 pg/mL). At 1-year follow-up, 51.2% of patients in the prodromal phase had converted to dementia. Serum NfL measurements at baseline were the strongest predictors of disease progression at 1-year follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p < 0.001). Conclusions Prodromal FTD is a mutable stage with high rate of progression to fully symptomatic disease at 1-year follow-up. High serum NfL levels may support prodromal FTD diagnosis and represent a helpful marker to assess disease progression.Alberto BenussiNicholas J. AshtonThomas K. KarikariAntonella AlbericiClaudia SaracenoRoberta GhidoniLuisa BenussiHenrik ZetterbergKaj BlennowBarbara BorroniBMCarticleFrontotemporal dementiaSerum neurofilament lightProdromalMildProgressionConversionNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENAlzheimer’s Research & Therapy, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Frontotemporal dementia Serum neurofilament light Prodromal Mild Progression Conversion Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 |
spellingShingle |
Frontotemporal dementia Serum neurofilament light Prodromal Mild Progression Conversion Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 Alberto Benussi Nicholas J. Ashton Thomas K. Karikari Antonella Alberici Claudia Saraceno Roberta Ghidoni Luisa Benussi Henrik Zetterberg Kaj Blennow Barbara Borroni Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
description |
Abstract Background The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. Methods In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NACC FTLD. Prodromal FTD was defined to reflect mild cognitive or behavioural impairment with relatively preserved functional independence (global CDR plus NACC = 0.5) as well as mild, moderate and severe dementia (classified as global CDR plus NACC = 1, 2, 3, respectively). Disease progression at 1-year follow-up and serum NfL measurements were acquired in a subgroup of patients. Results Of 563 participants, 138 were classified as prodromal FTD, 130 as mild, 175 as moderate and 120 as severe FTD. In the prodromal and mild phases, we observed an early increase in serum NfL levels followed by behavioural disturbances and deficits in executive functions. Negative symptoms, such as apathy, inflexibility and loss of insight, predominated in the prodromal phase. Serum NfL levels were significantly increased in the prodromal phase compared with healthy controls (average difference 14.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 26.1 pg/mL), but lower than in patients with mild FTD (average difference -15.5, 95% CI -28.4 to -2.7 pg/mL). At 1-year follow-up, 51.2% of patients in the prodromal phase had converted to dementia. Serum NfL measurements at baseline were the strongest predictors of disease progression at 1-year follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p < 0.001). Conclusions Prodromal FTD is a mutable stage with high rate of progression to fully symptomatic disease at 1-year follow-up. High serum NfL levels may support prodromal FTD diagnosis and represent a helpful marker to assess disease progression. |
format |
article |
author |
Alberto Benussi Nicholas J. Ashton Thomas K. Karikari Antonella Alberici Claudia Saraceno Roberta Ghidoni Luisa Benussi Henrik Zetterberg Kaj Blennow Barbara Borroni |
author_facet |
Alberto Benussi Nicholas J. Ashton Thomas K. Karikari Antonella Alberici Claudia Saraceno Roberta Ghidoni Luisa Benussi Henrik Zetterberg Kaj Blennow Barbara Borroni |
author_sort |
Alberto Benussi |
title |
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_short |
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_full |
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_fullStr |
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_sort |
prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7434446daf234058909f16d1c6cc2be3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT albertobenussi prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT nicholasjashton prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT thomaskkarikari prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT antonellaalberici prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT claudiasaraceno prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT robertaghidoni prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT luisabenussi prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT henrikzetterberg prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT kajblennow prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT barbaraborroni prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression |
_version_ |
1718418891219140608 |