The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.

Providing cognitive challenges to zoo-housed animals may provide enriching effects and subsequently enhance their welfare. Primates may benefit most from such challenges as they often face complex problems in their natural environment and can be observed to seek problem solving opportunities in capt...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamie Whitehouse, Jérôme Micheletta, Lauren E Powell, Celia Bordier, Bridget M Waller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7510d4eb9c3348a4971a5adfec7040dc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7510d4eb9c3348a4971a5adfec7040dc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7510d4eb9c3348a4971a5adfec7040dc2021-11-18T08:48:08ZThe impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0078308https://doaj.org/article/7510d4eb9c3348a4971a5adfec7040dc2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24223146/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Providing cognitive challenges to zoo-housed animals may provide enriching effects and subsequently enhance their welfare. Primates may benefit most from such challenges as they often face complex problems in their natural environment and can be observed to seek problem solving opportunities in captivity. However, the extent to which welfare benefits can be achieved through programmes developed primarily for cognitive research is unknown. We tested the impact of voluntary participation cognitive testing on the welfare of a socially housed group of crested macaques (Macaca nigra) at the Macaque Study Centre (Marwell Zoo). First, we compared the rate of self-directed and social behaviours on testing and non-testing days, and between conditions within testing days. Minimal differences in behaviour were found when comparing testing and non-testing days, suggesting that there was no negative impact on welfare as a result of cognitive testing. Lipsmacking behaviours were found to increase and aggressive interaction was found to decrease in the group as a result of testing. Second, social network analysis was used to assess the effect of testing on associations and interactions between individuals. The social networks showed that testing subjects increased their association with others during testing days. One interpretation of this finding could be that providing socially housed primates with an opportunity for individuals to separate from the group for short periods could help mimic natural patterns of sub-group formation and reunion in captivity. The findings suggest, therefore, that the welfare of captive primates can be improved through the use of cognitive testing in zoo environments.Jamie WhitehouseJérôme MichelettaLauren E PowellCelia BordierBridget M WallerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 11, p e78308 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jamie Whitehouse
Jérôme Micheletta
Lauren E Powell
Celia Bordier
Bridget M Waller
The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
description Providing cognitive challenges to zoo-housed animals may provide enriching effects and subsequently enhance their welfare. Primates may benefit most from such challenges as they often face complex problems in their natural environment and can be observed to seek problem solving opportunities in captivity. However, the extent to which welfare benefits can be achieved through programmes developed primarily for cognitive research is unknown. We tested the impact of voluntary participation cognitive testing on the welfare of a socially housed group of crested macaques (Macaca nigra) at the Macaque Study Centre (Marwell Zoo). First, we compared the rate of self-directed and social behaviours on testing and non-testing days, and between conditions within testing days. Minimal differences in behaviour were found when comparing testing and non-testing days, suggesting that there was no negative impact on welfare as a result of cognitive testing. Lipsmacking behaviours were found to increase and aggressive interaction was found to decrease in the group as a result of testing. Second, social network analysis was used to assess the effect of testing on associations and interactions between individuals. The social networks showed that testing subjects increased their association with others during testing days. One interpretation of this finding could be that providing socially housed primates with an opportunity for individuals to separate from the group for short periods could help mimic natural patterns of sub-group formation and reunion in captivity. The findings suggest, therefore, that the welfare of captive primates can be improved through the use of cognitive testing in zoo environments.
format article
author Jamie Whitehouse
Jérôme Micheletta
Lauren E Powell
Celia Bordier
Bridget M Waller
author_facet Jamie Whitehouse
Jérôme Micheletta
Lauren E Powell
Celia Bordier
Bridget M Waller
author_sort Jamie Whitehouse
title The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
title_short The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
title_full The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
title_fullStr The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
title_sort impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/7510d4eb9c3348a4971a5adfec7040dc
work_keys_str_mv AT jamiewhitehouse theimpactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT jeromemicheletta theimpactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT laurenepowell theimpactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT celiabordier theimpactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT bridgetmwaller theimpactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT jamiewhitehouse impactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT jeromemicheletta impactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT laurenepowell impactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT celiabordier impactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
AT bridgetmwaller impactofcognitivetestingonthewelfareofgrouphousedprimates
_version_ 1718421269343371264