Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist’s scholarly impact
Objectives: Describe the h index as a bibliometric that can be utilized to objectively evaluate scholarly impact. Identify which otolaryngology subspecialties are the most scholarly. Describe if NIH funding to one’s choice of medical school, residency, or fellowship has any impact on one’s scholarly...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Courtney B. Shires, Theodore D. Klug, Ryan K. Meacham, Merry E. Sebelik |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7513d9e9aaa94dbbb4681d2cd0901f94 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Preoperative and postoperative medical therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis: National surveys among Chinese otolaryngologists
por: Zhen-Xiao Huang, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction: The Otolaryngologist's perspective
por: Qasim Husain, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Telehealth in the times of SARS-CoV-2 infection for the otolaryngologist
por: Victoria W. Huang, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of 3Â mm versus 4Â mm rigid endoscope in diagnostic nasal endoscopy
por: Gregory S. Neel, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Novel Case of Profound Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation From New-Generation Iron Chelation Therapy
por: Mathew T. Ryan MD, et al.
Publicado: (2021)