The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive

Infinitives and infinitival constructions seem to be a kind of conceptualization embedded in a language with a ‘genus’ different to that of other grammatical forms. But why did human cognition invent infinitives and their associated constructions? On an ontological level, infinitives indicate inten...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Mariusz Izydor Prokopowicz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2014
Materias:	infinitival forms discource-projection aspectuality Egyptian grammar Ancient history D51-90 History of the arts NX440-632
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7515f17dc9274500a6598c072da57b71
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7515f17dc9274500a6598c072da57b71
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7515f17dc9274500a6598c072da57b712021-11-27T13:19:30ZThe Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive10.12797/SAAC.18.2014.18.161899-15482449-867Xhttps://doaj.org/article/7515f17dc9274500a6598c072da57b712014-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/saac/article/view/3092https://doaj.org/toc/1899-1548https://doaj.org/toc/2449-867X Infinitives and infinitival constructions seem to be a kind of conceptualization embedded in a language with a ‘genus’ different to that of other grammatical forms. But why did human cognition invent infinitives and their associated constructions? On an ontological level, infinitives indicate intentionality that is pro-modal and timeless future-situationoriented (Prokopowicz 2012). Timeless future orientation expresses accomplishment or achievement, which are different states of perfectivity. If verbal finished forms direct our attention to the complexity of events, which we can for instance classify and express in ‘eventive’ sentences, infinitival forms draw our attention to situations (for a different context, see Borghouts 2010: ‘situative clauses’; Prokopowicz 2012: ‘quality, state, activity, event vs situation’). Situations are more complex than events as they involve a speaker with varying intentions, as well as the cotext of this speaker’s expression. Infinitival forms are less sentence-projected and more discourse-projected. All of this research has an obvious hermeneutical background. If something is expressed syntactically in one language, it may as well be expressed morphologically or semantically in other languages. Mariusz Izydor ProkopowiczKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticleinfinitival formsdiscource-projectionaspectualityEgyptian grammarAncient historyD51-90History of the artsNX440-632ENFRStudies in Ancient Art and Civilization, Vol 18 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	infinitival forms discource-projection aspectuality Egyptian grammar Ancient history D51-90 History of the arts NX440-632
spellingShingle	infinitival forms discource-projection aspectuality Egyptian grammar Ancient history D51-90 History of the arts NX440-632 Mariusz Izydor Prokopowicz The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive
description	Infinitives and infinitival constructions seem to be a kind of conceptualization embedded in a language with a ‘genus’ different to that of other grammatical forms. But why did human cognition invent infinitives and their associated constructions? On an ontological level, infinitives indicate intentionality that is pro-modal and timeless future-situationoriented (Prokopowicz 2012). Timeless future orientation expresses accomplishment or achievement, which are different states of perfectivity. If verbal finished forms direct our attention to the complexity of events, which we can for instance classify and express in ‘eventive’ sentences, infinitival forms draw our attention to situations (for a different context, see Borghouts 2010: ‘situative clauses’; Prokopowicz 2012: ‘quality, state, activity, event vs situation’). Situations are more complex than events as they involve a speaker with varying intentions, as well as the cotext of this speaker’s expression. Infinitival forms are less sentence-projected and more discourse-projected. All of this research has an obvious hermeneutical background. If something is expressed syntactically in one language, it may as well be expressed morphologically or semantically in other languages.
format	article
author	Mariusz Izydor Prokopowicz
author_facet	Mariusz Izydor Prokopowicz
author_sort	Mariusz Izydor Prokopowicz
title	The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive
title_short	The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive
title_full	The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive
title_fullStr	The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive
title_full_unstemmed	The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive
title_sort	ancient egyptian second infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ interpreted through the biblical infinitive absolute and the polish second infinitive
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/7515f17dc9274500a6598c072da57b71
work_keys_str_mv	AT mariuszizydorprokopowicz theancientegyptiansecondinfinitiveiwsubjectrinfinitiveinterpretedthroughthebiblicalinfinitiveabsoluteandthepolishsecondinfinitive AT mariuszizydorprokopowicz ancientegyptiansecondinfinitiveiwsubjectrinfinitiveinterpretedthroughthebiblicalinfinitiveabsoluteandthepolishsecondinfinitive
_version_	1718408507661746176

The Ancient Egyptian Second Infinitive? ‘iw + subject + r + infinitive’ Interpreted Through the Biblical Infinitive Absolute and the Polish Second Infinitive

Ejemplares similares