Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI

Abstract Background To investigate diagnostic errors and their association with adverse outcomes (AOs) during patient revisits with repeat imaging (RVRIs) in the emergency department (ED). Results Diagnostic errors stemming from index imaging studies and AOs within 30 days in 1054 RVRIs (≤ 7 days) f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yura Ahn, Gil-Sun Hong, Kye Jin Park, Choong Wook Lee, Ju Hee Lee, Seon-Ok Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/753e6c45ddc14c61b7e238263c855447
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:753e6c45ddc14c61b7e238263c855447
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:753e6c45ddc14c61b7e238263c8554472021-11-07T12:14:38ZImpact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI10.1186/s13244-021-01108-01869-4101https://doaj.org/article/753e6c45ddc14c61b7e238263c8554472021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01108-0https://doaj.org/toc/1869-4101Abstract Background To investigate diagnostic errors and their association with adverse outcomes (AOs) during patient revisits with repeat imaging (RVRIs) in the emergency department (ED). Results Diagnostic errors stemming from index imaging studies and AOs within 30 days in 1054 RVRIs (≤ 7 days) from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed according to revisit timing (early [≤ 72 h] or late [> 72 h to 7 days] RVRIs). Risk factors for AOs were assessed using multivariable logistic analysis. The AO rate in the diagnostic error group was significantly higher than that in the non-error group (33.3% [77 of 231] vs. 14.8% [122 of 823], p < .001). The AO rate was the highest in early revisits within 72 h if diagnostic errors occurred (36.2%, 54 of 149). The most common diseases associated with diagnostic errors were digestive diseases in the radiologic misdiagnosis category (47.5%, 28 of 59) and neurologic diseases in the delayed radiology reporting time (46.8%, 29 of 62) and clinician error (27.3%, 30 of 110) categories. In the matched set of the AO and non-AO groups, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the following diagnostic errors contributed to AO occurrence: radiologic error (odds ratio [OR] 3.56; p < .001) in total RVRIs, radiologic error (OR 3.70; p = .001) and clinician error (OR 4.82; p = .03) in early RVRIs, and radiologic error (OR 3.36; p = .02) in late RVRIs. Conclusion Diagnostic errors in index imaging studies are strongly associated with high AO rates in RVRIs in the ED.Yura AhnGil-Sun HongKye Jin ParkChoong Wook LeeJu Hee LeeSeon-Ok KimSpringerOpenarticleEmergency health servicesDiagnostic imagingDiagnostic errorsQuality indicatorsAdverse outcomesMedical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicineR895-920ENInsights into Imaging, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Emergency health services
Diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic errors
Quality indicators
Adverse outcomes
Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
R895-920
spellingShingle Emergency health services
Diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic errors
Quality indicators
Adverse outcomes
Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
R895-920
Yura Ahn
Gil-Sun Hong
Kye Jin Park
Choong Wook Lee
Ju Hee Lee
Seon-Ok Kim
Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI
description Abstract Background To investigate diagnostic errors and their association with adverse outcomes (AOs) during patient revisits with repeat imaging (RVRIs) in the emergency department (ED). Results Diagnostic errors stemming from index imaging studies and AOs within 30 days in 1054 RVRIs (≤ 7 days) from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed according to revisit timing (early [≤ 72 h] or late [> 72 h to 7 days] RVRIs). Risk factors for AOs were assessed using multivariable logistic analysis. The AO rate in the diagnostic error group was significantly higher than that in the non-error group (33.3% [77 of 231] vs. 14.8% [122 of 823], p < .001). The AO rate was the highest in early revisits within 72 h if diagnostic errors occurred (36.2%, 54 of 149). The most common diseases associated with diagnostic errors were digestive diseases in the radiologic misdiagnosis category (47.5%, 28 of 59) and neurologic diseases in the delayed radiology reporting time (46.8%, 29 of 62) and clinician error (27.3%, 30 of 110) categories. In the matched set of the AO and non-AO groups, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the following diagnostic errors contributed to AO occurrence: radiologic error (odds ratio [OR] 3.56; p < .001) in total RVRIs, radiologic error (OR 3.70; p = .001) and clinician error (OR 4.82; p = .03) in early RVRIs, and radiologic error (OR 3.36; p = .02) in late RVRIs. Conclusion Diagnostic errors in index imaging studies are strongly associated with high AO rates in RVRIs in the ED.
format article
author Yura Ahn
Gil-Sun Hong
Kye Jin Park
Choong Wook Lee
Ju Hee Lee
Seon-Ok Kim
author_facet Yura Ahn
Gil-Sun Hong
Kye Jin Park
Choong Wook Lee
Ju Hee Lee
Seon-Ok Kim
author_sort Yura Ahn
title Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI
title_short Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI
title_full Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI
title_fullStr Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI
title_full_unstemmed Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI
title_sort impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat ct or mri
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/753e6c45ddc14c61b7e238263c855447
work_keys_str_mv AT yuraahn impactofdiagnosticerrorsonadverseoutcomeslearningfromemergencydepartmentrevisitswithrepeatctormri
AT gilsunhong impactofdiagnosticerrorsonadverseoutcomeslearningfromemergencydepartmentrevisitswithrepeatctormri
AT kyejinpark impactofdiagnosticerrorsonadverseoutcomeslearningfromemergencydepartmentrevisitswithrepeatctormri
AT choongwooklee impactofdiagnosticerrorsonadverseoutcomeslearningfromemergencydepartmentrevisitswithrepeatctormri
AT juheelee impactofdiagnosticerrorsonadverseoutcomeslearningfromemergencydepartmentrevisitswithrepeatctormri
AT seonokkim impactofdiagnosticerrorsonadverseoutcomeslearningfromemergencydepartmentrevisitswithrepeatctormri
_version_ 1718443495281131520