An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models

Background: Gene therapies can treat, prevent, or cure a disease by changing the expression of a person’s genes. They are an innovative strategy for treating genetic disorders; however, they are still emerging on the market access and in the healthcare system. Health technology assessment (HTA) agen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michał Pochopień, Ewelina Paterak, Emilie Clay, Justyna Janik, Samuel Aballea, Małgorzata Biernikiewicz, Mondher Toumi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/754b4c674be641ef872d82a64d8b4e17
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:754b4c674be641ef872d82a64d8b4e17
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:754b4c674be641ef872d82a64d8b4e172021-11-17T14:21:57ZAn overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models2001-668910.1080/20016689.2021.2002006https://doaj.org/article/754b4c674be641ef872d82a64d8b4e172021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2021.2002006https://doaj.org/toc/2001-6689Background: Gene therapies can treat, prevent, or cure a disease by changing the expression of a person’s genes. They are an innovative strategy for treating genetic disorders; however, they are still emerging on the market access and in the healthcare system. Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies have not yet elaborated any standardised approach for assessing gene therapies; therefore, significant differences can be seen during HTAs carried out in various countries. In this review, we focused on submitted economic models of gene therapies approved for use by the US FDA and EMA with the aim to provide a comprehensive summary of how selected HTA bodies assessed the cost-effectiveness of gene therapies. An additional objective was to examine and discuss differences in the methods used in economic models across countries and drugs. Methods: We identified economic models of gene therapies from six countries (NICE, IQWiG, SMC, HAS, CADTH, ICER) and focused on nine agents (Glybera, Imlygic, Strimvelis, Yescarta, Kymriah, Luxturna, Zynteglo, Zolgensma, Tecartus). Details of cost-utility evaluations and budget impact models were reviewed and extracted. Results: Overall, 983 publications were identified, and 17 studies were included for the analysis. Reviewed evaluations of gene therapies differed in terms of the study perspective, discounting, extrapolation of outcomes based on limited and immature data, time horizon, and adequate estimation of benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life-years. Methods of economic evaluations were in line with the current recommendations; however, long-term follow-up studies are still missing. Conclusions: Discrepancies in an economic evaluation of gene therapies between different HTA bodies are rooted in a lack of general assessment frameworks specific to gene therapies. Although challenges were resolved by adjustments to the currently used value assessment framework, new methodological approaches would be useful. In addition, to improve the methods and quality of an evaluation, further research would be valuable.Michał PochopieńEwelina PaterakEmilie ClayJustyna JanikSamuel AballeaMałgorzata BiernikiewiczMondher ToumiTaylor & Francis Grouparticlegene therapyeconomic evaluationcost-effectiveness modelhealth technology assessmentPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270BusinessHF5001-6182ENJournal of Market Access & Health Policy, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic gene therapy
economic evaluation
cost-effectiveness model
health technology assessment
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Business
HF5001-6182
spellingShingle gene therapy
economic evaluation
cost-effectiveness model
health technology assessment
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Business
HF5001-6182
Michał Pochopień
Ewelina Paterak
Emilie Clay
Justyna Janik
Samuel Aballea
Małgorzata Biernikiewicz
Mondher Toumi
An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
description Background: Gene therapies can treat, prevent, or cure a disease by changing the expression of a person’s genes. They are an innovative strategy for treating genetic disorders; however, they are still emerging on the market access and in the healthcare system. Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies have not yet elaborated any standardised approach for assessing gene therapies; therefore, significant differences can be seen during HTAs carried out in various countries. In this review, we focused on submitted economic models of gene therapies approved for use by the US FDA and EMA with the aim to provide a comprehensive summary of how selected HTA bodies assessed the cost-effectiveness of gene therapies. An additional objective was to examine and discuss differences in the methods used in economic models across countries and drugs. Methods: We identified economic models of gene therapies from six countries (NICE, IQWiG, SMC, HAS, CADTH, ICER) and focused on nine agents (Glybera, Imlygic, Strimvelis, Yescarta, Kymriah, Luxturna, Zynteglo, Zolgensma, Tecartus). Details of cost-utility evaluations and budget impact models were reviewed and extracted. Results: Overall, 983 publications were identified, and 17 studies were included for the analysis. Reviewed evaluations of gene therapies differed in terms of the study perspective, discounting, extrapolation of outcomes based on limited and immature data, time horizon, and adequate estimation of benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life-years. Methods of economic evaluations were in line with the current recommendations; however, long-term follow-up studies are still missing. Conclusions: Discrepancies in an economic evaluation of gene therapies between different HTA bodies are rooted in a lack of general assessment frameworks specific to gene therapies. Although challenges were resolved by adjustments to the currently used value assessment framework, new methodological approaches would be useful. In addition, to improve the methods and quality of an evaluation, further research would be valuable.
format article
author Michał Pochopień
Ewelina Paterak
Emilie Clay
Justyna Janik
Samuel Aballea
Małgorzata Biernikiewicz
Mondher Toumi
author_facet Michał Pochopień
Ewelina Paterak
Emilie Clay
Justyna Janik
Samuel Aballea
Małgorzata Biernikiewicz
Mondher Toumi
author_sort Michał Pochopień
title An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
title_short An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
title_full An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
title_fullStr An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
title_full_unstemmed An overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
title_sort overview of health technology assessments of gene therapies with the focus on cost-effectiveness models
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/754b4c674be641ef872d82a64d8b4e17
work_keys_str_mv AT michałpochopien anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT ewelinapaterak anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT emilieclay anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT justynajanik anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT samuelaballea anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT małgorzatabiernikiewicz anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT mondhertoumi anoverviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT michałpochopien overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT ewelinapaterak overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT emilieclay overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT justynajanik overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT samuelaballea overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT małgorzatabiernikiewicz overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
AT mondhertoumi overviewofhealthtechnologyassessmentsofgenetherapieswiththefocusoncosteffectivenessmodels
_version_ 1718425490578997248