The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique

Aim. To consider technical aspects of antihyperglycemic injection therapy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods. The analysis included 200 adult patients (60 men and 140 women) receiving injection therapy for at least 6 months. They filled a 40-iremquestionnaire designed to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olga Georgievna Mel'nikova, Alexander Yur'evich Mayorov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Endocrinology Research Centre 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/755184363f3848c380dc4a79a57df2db
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:755184363f3848c380dc4a79a57df2db
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:755184363f3848c380dc4a79a57df2db2021-11-14T09:00:15ZThe injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique2072-03512072-037810.14341/2072-0351-5486https://doaj.org/article/755184363f3848c380dc4a79a57df2db2010-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dia-endojournals.ru/jour/article/view/5486https://doaj.org/toc/2072-0351https://doaj.org/toc/2072-0378Aim. To consider technical aspects of antihyperglycemic injection therapy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods. The analysis included 200 adult patients (60 men and 140 women) receiving injection therapy for at least 6 months. They filled a 40-iremquestionnaire designed to estimate socio-demographic parameters, the use of different devices for insulin injection, and the most frequent mistakesmade by the patients. Their mean age was 51.7?15.1 years, duration of DM 11.9?9.1 years, mean HbA1c level 8.4?1.5%. Results. 130 (65%) patients used semiautomated injection pens, 39 (19.5%) disposable syringes, 31 (15.5%) both devices. Most patients (122, 61%)used 8 mm needles, 32 (16%) used 12.7 mm needles, 31 (15.5%) 10 mm, 28 (14%) 12 mm, 19 (9.5%) 6 mm, 18 (9.0%) 5 mm. 64 (32%) patientsused needles of different length, 25 (12.5%) could not give a definitive information about the needle length they used. Location of injection sites variedconsiderably in individual patients. 87 (43.5%) made injections within a single anatomic regions (62 into the anterior abdominal wall, 19 into theanterolateral surface of the thigh, 5 into shoulders, and 1 into buttocks. 113 (56.5%) patients made injections into two or more regions. 83 (41.5%)developed lipodystrophy at injection sites, 42 (50.6%) continued to use them for injections (12 did it on a regular basis and 30 occasionally). HbA1clevels were 9.5 and 8.2% in patients who made injections into affected sites and who had no lipodystrophic changes respectively (p=0.02). Over halfof the interviewed patients (106 or 53%) were informed about correct subcutaneous injection technique by the attending endocrinologist, 60 (30%)were taught by the nursing staff while staying in a hospital or visiting an endocrinological dispensary, 28 (14.%) were educated at Diabetes schools,9 (4.5%) when seeing the local therapist, and 19 (9.5%) by non-professionals. Conclusion. Many patients make serious mistakes when self-administering insulin. Incompliance with the guidelines on insulin injections leading tothe impairment of carbohydrate metabolism, the technical aspects of injections must be in the focus of attention of any practitioner. New (2010) internationalguidelines on the injection technique are overviewed.Olga Georgievna Mel'nikovaAlexander Yur'evich MayorovEndocrinology Research Centrearticleinjection techniqueinsulinquestionnaireNutritional diseases. Deficiency diseasesRC620-627ENRUСахарный диабет, Vol 13, Iss 3, Pp 38-44 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic injection technique
insulin
questionnaire
Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases
RC620-627
spellingShingle injection technique
insulin
questionnaire
Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases
RC620-627
Olga Georgievna Mel'nikova
Alexander Yur'evich Mayorov
The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
description Aim. To consider technical aspects of antihyperglycemic injection therapy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods. The analysis included 200 adult patients (60 men and 140 women) receiving injection therapy for at least 6 months. They filled a 40-iremquestionnaire designed to estimate socio-demographic parameters, the use of different devices for insulin injection, and the most frequent mistakesmade by the patients. Their mean age was 51.7?15.1 years, duration of DM 11.9?9.1 years, mean HbA1c level 8.4?1.5%. Results. 130 (65%) patients used semiautomated injection pens, 39 (19.5%) disposable syringes, 31 (15.5%) both devices. Most patients (122, 61%)used 8 mm needles, 32 (16%) used 12.7 mm needles, 31 (15.5%) 10 mm, 28 (14%) 12 mm, 19 (9.5%) 6 mm, 18 (9.0%) 5 mm. 64 (32%) patientsused needles of different length, 25 (12.5%) could not give a definitive information about the needle length they used. Location of injection sites variedconsiderably in individual patients. 87 (43.5%) made injections within a single anatomic regions (62 into the anterior abdominal wall, 19 into theanterolateral surface of the thigh, 5 into shoulders, and 1 into buttocks. 113 (56.5%) patients made injections into two or more regions. 83 (41.5%)developed lipodystrophy at injection sites, 42 (50.6%) continued to use them for injections (12 did it on a regular basis and 30 occasionally). HbA1clevels were 9.5 and 8.2% in patients who made injections into affected sites and who had no lipodystrophic changes respectively (p=0.02). Over halfof the interviewed patients (106 or 53%) were informed about correct subcutaneous injection technique by the attending endocrinologist, 60 (30%)were taught by the nursing staff while staying in a hospital or visiting an endocrinological dispensary, 28 (14.%) were educated at Diabetes schools,9 (4.5%) when seeing the local therapist, and 19 (9.5%) by non-professionals. Conclusion. Many patients make serious mistakes when self-administering insulin. Incompliance with the guidelines on insulin injections leading tothe impairment of carbohydrate metabolism, the technical aspects of injections must be in the focus of attention of any practitioner. New (2010) internationalguidelines on the injection technique are overviewed.
format article
author Olga Georgievna Mel'nikova
Alexander Yur'evich Mayorov
author_facet Olga Georgievna Mel'nikova
Alexander Yur'evich Mayorov
author_sort Olga Georgievna Mel'nikova
title The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
title_short The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
title_full The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
title_fullStr The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
title_full_unstemmed The injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in Russia. New international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
title_sort injection technique: results of a questionnaire study of diabetic patients in russia. new international guidelines on the injectiontechnique
publisher Endocrinology Research Centre
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/755184363f3848c380dc4a79a57df2db
work_keys_str_mv AT olgageorgievnamelnikova theinjectiontechniqueresultsofaquestionnairestudyofdiabeticpatientsinrussianewinternationalguidelinesontheinjectiontechnique
AT alexanderyurevichmayorov theinjectiontechniqueresultsofaquestionnairestudyofdiabeticpatientsinrussianewinternationalguidelinesontheinjectiontechnique
AT olgageorgievnamelnikova injectiontechniqueresultsofaquestionnairestudyofdiabeticpatientsinrussianewinternationalguidelinesontheinjectiontechnique
AT alexanderyurevichmayorov injectiontechniqueresultsofaquestionnairestudyofdiabeticpatientsinrussianewinternationalguidelinesontheinjectiontechnique
_version_ 1718429661413769216