Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal
Abstract In this work, diabetic glucose concentration level control under disturbing meal has been controlled using two set of advanced controllers. The first set is sliding mode controllers (classical and integral) and the second set is represented by optimal LQR controllers (classical and Min-...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/75b934b3ff0041afb5e90b2cab46abd8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:75b934b3ff0041afb5e90b2cab46abd8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:75b934b3ff0041afb5e90b2cab46abd82021-12-02T03:50:44ZPerformance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal10.22153/kej.2017.03.0031818-11712312-0789https://doaj.org/article/75b934b3ff0041afb5e90b2cab46abd82017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://alkej.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/alkej/article/view/356https://doaj.org/toc/1818-1171https://doaj.org/toc/2312-0789 Abstract In this work, diabetic glucose concentration level control under disturbing meal has been controlled using two set of advanced controllers. The first set is sliding mode controllers (classical and integral) and the second set is represented by optimal LQR controllers (classical and Min-, ax). Due to their characteristic features of disturbance rejection, both integral sliding mode controller and LQR Minmax controller are dedicated here for comparison. The Bergman minimal mathematical model was used to represent the dynamic behavior of a diabetic patient’s blood glucose concentration to the insulin injection. Simulations based on Matlab/Simulink, were performed to verify the performance of each controller. In spite that Min-max optimal controller gave better disturbance rejection capability than classical optimal controller, classical sliding mode controller could outperform Min-max controller. However, it has been shown that integral sliding mode controller is the best of all in terms of disturbance rejection capability. Key words: Optimal LQR control, Optimalminimax control, Sliding mode control, Integral sliding mode control. Bashar Fateh MidhatAmjad Jaleel HumaidiAl-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of BaghdadarticleOptimal LQR control, Optimalminimax control, Sliding mode control, Integral sliding mode control.Chemical engineeringTP155-156Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAl-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, Vol 13, Iss 3 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Optimal LQR control, Optimalminimax control, Sliding mode control, Integral sliding mode control. Chemical engineering TP155-156 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 |
spellingShingle |
Optimal LQR control, Optimalminimax control, Sliding mode control, Integral sliding mode control. Chemical engineering TP155-156 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Bashar Fateh Midhat Amjad Jaleel Humaidi Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal |
description |
Abstract
In this work, diabetic glucose concentration level control under disturbing meal has been controlled using two set of advanced controllers. The first set is sliding mode controllers (classical and integral) and the second set is represented by optimal LQR controllers (classical and Min-, ax). Due to their characteristic features of disturbance rejection, both integral sliding mode controller and LQR Minmax controller are dedicated here for comparison. The Bergman minimal mathematical model was used to represent the dynamic behavior of a diabetic patient’s blood glucose concentration to the insulin injection. Simulations based on Matlab/Simulink, were performed to verify the performance of each controller. In spite that Min-max optimal controller gave better disturbance rejection capability than classical optimal controller, classical sliding mode controller could outperform Min-max controller. However, it has been shown that integral sliding mode controller is the best of all in terms of disturbance rejection capability.
Key words: Optimal LQR control, Optimalminimax control, Sliding mode control, Integral sliding mode control.
|
format |
article |
author |
Bashar Fateh Midhat Amjad Jaleel Humaidi |
author_facet |
Bashar Fateh Midhat Amjad Jaleel Humaidi |
author_sort |
Bashar Fateh Midhat |
title |
Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal |
title_short |
Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal |
title_full |
Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal |
title_fullStr |
Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Comparison of Different Advanced Control Schemes for Glucose Level Control under Disturbing Meal |
title_sort |
performance comparison of different advanced control schemes for glucose level control under disturbing meal |
publisher |
Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/75b934b3ff0041afb5e90b2cab46abd8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT basharfatehmidhat performancecomparisonofdifferentadvancedcontrolschemesforglucoselevelcontrolunderdisturbingmeal AT amjadjaleelhumaidi performancecomparisonofdifferentadvancedcontrolschemesforglucoselevelcontrolunderdisturbingmeal |
_version_ |
1718401603457777664 |