Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder

In this paper, my goal is to use an epistemic injustice framework to extend an existing normative analysis of over-medicalization to psychiatry and thus draw attention to overlooked injustices. Kaczmarek (2019) has developed a promising bioethical and pragmatic approach to over-medicalization, which...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c32021-11-30T16:47:49ZWrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder1845-84751849-0514https://doaj.org/article/75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c32021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/file/386286https://doaj.org/toc/1845-8475https://doaj.org/toc/1849-0514In this paper, my goal is to use an epistemic injustice framework to extend an existing normative analysis of over-medicalization to psychiatry and thus draw attention to overlooked injustices. Kaczmarek (2019) has developed a promising bioethical and pragmatic approach to over-medicalization, which consists of four guiding questions covering issues related to the harms and benefits of medicalization. In a nutshell, if we answer “yes” to all proposed questions, then it is a case of over-medicalization. Building on an epistemic injustice framework, I will argue that Kaczmarek’s proposal lacks guidance concerning the procedures through which we are to answer the four questions, and I will import the conceptual resources of epistemic injustice to guide our thinking on these issues. This will lead me to defend more inclusive decision-making procedures regarding medicalization in the DSM. Kaczmarek’s account complemented with an epistemic injustice framework can help us achieve better forms of medicalization. I will then use a contested case of medicalization, the creation of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) in the DSM-5 to illustrate how the epistemic injustice framework can help to shed light on these issues and to show its relevance to distinguish good and bad forms of medicalization.Anne-Marie Gagné-JulienUniversity of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences articleover-medicalizationepistemic injusticepremenstrual dysphoric disorderhermeneutical injusticepre-emptive testimonial injusticeMiranda FrickerPhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENEuropean Journal of Analytic Philosophy, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp S4-36 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic over-medicalization
epistemic injustice
premenstrual dysphoric disorder
hermeneutical injustice
pre-emptive testimonial injustice
Miranda Fricker
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle over-medicalization
epistemic injustice
premenstrual dysphoric disorder
hermeneutical injustice
pre-emptive testimonial injustice
Miranda Fricker
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
description In this paper, my goal is to use an epistemic injustice framework to extend an existing normative analysis of over-medicalization to psychiatry and thus draw attention to overlooked injustices. Kaczmarek (2019) has developed a promising bioethical and pragmatic approach to over-medicalization, which consists of four guiding questions covering issues related to the harms and benefits of medicalization. In a nutshell, if we answer “yes” to all proposed questions, then it is a case of over-medicalization. Building on an epistemic injustice framework, I will argue that Kaczmarek’s proposal lacks guidance concerning the procedures through which we are to answer the four questions, and I will import the conceptual resources of epistemic injustice to guide our thinking on these issues. This will lead me to defend more inclusive decision-making procedures regarding medicalization in the DSM. Kaczmarek’s account complemented with an epistemic injustice framework can help us achieve better forms of medicalization. I will then use a contested case of medicalization, the creation of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) in the DSM-5 to illustrate how the epistemic injustice framework can help to shed light on these issues and to show its relevance to distinguish good and bad forms of medicalization.
format article
author Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
author_facet Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
author_sort Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
title Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
title_short Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
title_full Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
title_fullStr Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
title_sort wrongful medicalization and epistemic injustice in psychiatry: the case of premenstrual dysphoric disorder
publisher University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c3
work_keys_str_mv AT annemariegagnejulien wrongfulmedicalizationandepistemicinjusticeinpsychiatrythecaseofpremenstrualdysphoricdisorder
_version_ 1718406451569885184