Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
In this paper, my goal is to use an epistemic injustice framework to extend an existing normative analysis of over-medicalization to psychiatry and thus draw attention to overlooked injustices. Kaczmarek (2019) has developed a promising bioethical and pragmatic approach to over-medicalization, which...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c32021-11-30T16:47:49ZWrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder1845-84751849-0514https://doaj.org/article/75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c32021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/file/386286https://doaj.org/toc/1845-8475https://doaj.org/toc/1849-0514In this paper, my goal is to use an epistemic injustice framework to extend an existing normative analysis of over-medicalization to psychiatry and thus draw attention to overlooked injustices. Kaczmarek (2019) has developed a promising bioethical and pragmatic approach to over-medicalization, which consists of four guiding questions covering issues related to the harms and benefits of medicalization. In a nutshell, if we answer “yes” to all proposed questions, then it is a case of over-medicalization. Building on an epistemic injustice framework, I will argue that Kaczmarek’s proposal lacks guidance concerning the procedures through which we are to answer the four questions, and I will import the conceptual resources of epistemic injustice to guide our thinking on these issues. This will lead me to defend more inclusive decision-making procedures regarding medicalization in the DSM. Kaczmarek’s account complemented with an epistemic injustice framework can help us achieve better forms of medicalization. I will then use a contested case of medicalization, the creation of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) in the DSM-5 to illustrate how the epistemic injustice framework can help to shed light on these issues and to show its relevance to distinguish good and bad forms of medicalization.Anne-Marie Gagné-JulienUniversity of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences articleover-medicalizationepistemic injusticepremenstrual dysphoric disorderhermeneutical injusticepre-emptive testimonial injusticeMiranda FrickerPhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENEuropean Journal of Analytic Philosophy, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp S4-36 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
over-medicalization epistemic injustice premenstrual dysphoric disorder hermeneutical injustice pre-emptive testimonial injustice Miranda Fricker Philosophy (General) B1-5802 |
spellingShingle |
over-medicalization epistemic injustice premenstrual dysphoric disorder hermeneutical injustice pre-emptive testimonial injustice Miranda Fricker Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder |
description |
In this paper, my goal is to use an epistemic injustice framework to extend an existing normative analysis of over-medicalization to psychiatry and thus draw attention to overlooked injustices. Kaczmarek (2019) has developed a promising bioethical and pragmatic approach to over-medicalization, which consists of four guiding questions covering issues related to the harms and benefits of medicalization. In a nutshell, if we answer “yes” to all proposed questions, then it is a case of over-medicalization. Building on an epistemic injustice framework, I will argue that Kaczmarek’s proposal lacks guidance concerning the procedures through which we are to answer the four questions, and I will import the conceptual resources of epistemic injustice to guide our thinking on these issues. This will lead me to defend more inclusive decision-making procedures regarding medicalization in the DSM. Kaczmarek’s account complemented with an epistemic injustice framework can help us achieve better forms of medicalization. I will then use a contested case of medicalization, the creation of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) in the DSM-5 to illustrate how the epistemic injustice framework can help to shed light on these issues and to show its relevance to distinguish good and bad forms of medicalization. |
format |
article |
author |
Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien |
author_facet |
Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien |
author_sort |
Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien |
title |
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder |
title_short |
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder |
title_full |
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder |
title_fullStr |
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed |
Wrongful Medicalization and Epistemic Injustice in Psychiatry: The Case of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder |
title_sort |
wrongful medicalization and epistemic injustice in psychiatry: the case of premenstrual dysphoric disorder |
publisher |
University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/75bac3760c7240288b0b5007be8ab3c3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annemariegagnejulien wrongfulmedicalizationandepistemicinjusticeinpsychiatrythecaseofpremenstrualdysphoricdisorder |
_version_ |
1718406451569885184 |