Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system
Although most emergent wetlands across central North America have been destroyed or degraded, wetland restoration in recent decades has provided new habitat resources for wetland birds in agriculturally dominated landscapes. The goals of wetland restorations often include providing habitat for migra...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Resilience Alliance
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/75c0de4cfc0b45a8adf0028a18b0ce47 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:75c0de4cfc0b45a8adf0028a18b0ce47 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:75c0de4cfc0b45a8adf0028a18b0ce472021-11-15T16:40:14ZNest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system1712-6568https://doaj.org/article/75c0de4cfc0b45a8adf0028a18b0ce472021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ace-eco.org/vol16/iss1/art6/https://doaj.org/toc/1712-6568Although most emergent wetlands across central North America have been destroyed or degraded, wetland restoration in recent decades has provided new habitat resources for wetland birds in agriculturally dominated landscapes. The goals of wetland restorations often include providing habitat for migratory and breeding waterfowl and other wetland birds. One such restored wetland complex in the Illinois River Valley, the Emiquon Preserve, is isolated from most flooding events of the Illinois River allowing the growth of persistent emergent vegetation that was quickly colonized by breeding wetland birds. We examined nest occurrence and variables influencing site selection, nest success, and changes in nest density across stages of the wetland succession cycle. We located 327 nests from nine species of wetland birds (American Bittern, Botaurus lentiginosus; American Coot, Fulica americana; Black-crowned Night-Heron, Nycticorax nycticorax; Black-necked Stilt, Himantopus mexicanus; Common Gallinule, Gallinula galeata; Green Heron, Butorides virescens; Least Bittern, Ixobrychus exilis; Pied-billed Grebe, Podilymbus podiceps; Sora, Porzana carolina) during 2013-2019. Common Gallinules were more likely to nest in persistent emergent vegetation than other cover types. American Coots and Least Bitterns selected nest sites based on water depth. Black-necked Stilt and Black-crowned Night-Heron nests were less successful in deeper water. Black-necked Stilt, Black-crowned Night-Heron, and Common Gallinule nests were less successful with later initiation dates. Nest density did not vary between persistent emergent and hemi-marsh cover types. Across 2013-2019 we estimated an average of 372 nests/year for six marsh-nesting bird species at Emiquon, including two state-endangered (Common Gallinule and Black-crowned Night-Heron) and one state-threatened (Least Bittern). Wetlands restored from agricultural fields can quickly provide critical breeding habitat for marsh-nesting birds of conservation concern, although continued management is needed to provide resources to maintain persistent emergent vegetation communities as individual marshes transition through the marsh cycle.Auriel M. V. FournierJoseph D. LancasterAaron P. YetterChristopher S. HineTyler BeckermanJacob FiggeAntonio GioeMacayla Greider-WagnerDevin JenCody JohnsonMax R. LarreurAbigail ShawKayanna WolterMichael WoodDaniel K. WuBenjamin J. O'NealHeath M. HagyResilience Alliancearticlemarsh birdsmarsh succession cyclenest-site selectionnest successshorebirdswetland restorationPlant cultureSB1-1110Environmental sciencesGE1-350Plant ecologyQK900-989ENAvian Conservation and Ecology, Vol 16, Iss 1, p 6 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
marsh birds marsh succession cycle nest-site selection nest success shorebirds wetland restoration Plant culture SB1-1110 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Plant ecology QK900-989 |
spellingShingle |
marsh birds marsh succession cycle nest-site selection nest success shorebirds wetland restoration Plant culture SB1-1110 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Plant ecology QK900-989 Auriel M. V. Fournier Joseph D. Lancaster Aaron P. Yetter Christopher S. Hine Tyler Beckerman Jacob Figge Antonio Gioe Macayla Greider-Wagner Devin Jen Cody Johnson Max R. Larreur Abigail Shaw Kayanna Wolter Michael Wood Daniel K. Wu Benjamin J. O'Neal Heath M. Hagy Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
description |
Although most emergent wetlands across central North America have been destroyed or degraded, wetland restoration in recent decades has provided new habitat resources for wetland birds in agriculturally dominated landscapes. The goals of wetland restorations often include providing habitat for migratory and breeding waterfowl and other wetland birds. One such restored wetland complex in the Illinois River Valley, the Emiquon Preserve, is isolated from most flooding events of the Illinois River allowing the growth of persistent emergent vegetation that was quickly colonized by breeding wetland birds. We examined nest occurrence and variables influencing site selection, nest success, and changes in nest density across stages of the wetland succession cycle. We located 327 nests from nine species of wetland birds (American Bittern, Botaurus lentiginosus; American Coot, Fulica americana; Black-crowned Night-Heron, Nycticorax nycticorax; Black-necked Stilt, Himantopus mexicanus; Common Gallinule, Gallinula galeata; Green Heron, Butorides virescens; Least Bittern, Ixobrychus exilis; Pied-billed Grebe, Podilymbus podiceps; Sora, Porzana carolina) during 2013-2019. Common Gallinules were more likely to nest in persistent emergent vegetation than other cover types. American Coots and Least Bitterns selected nest sites based on water depth. Black-necked Stilt and Black-crowned Night-Heron nests were less successful in deeper water. Black-necked Stilt, Black-crowned Night-Heron, and Common Gallinule nests were less successful with later initiation dates. Nest density did not vary between persistent emergent and hemi-marsh cover types. Across 2013-2019 we estimated an average of 372 nests/year for six marsh-nesting bird species at Emiquon, including two state-endangered (Common Gallinule and Black-crowned Night-Heron) and one state-threatened (Least Bittern). Wetlands restored from agricultural fields can quickly provide critical breeding habitat for marsh-nesting birds of conservation concern, although continued management is needed to provide resources to maintain persistent emergent vegetation communities as individual marshes transition through the marsh cycle. |
format |
article |
author |
Auriel M. V. Fournier Joseph D. Lancaster Aaron P. Yetter Christopher S. Hine Tyler Beckerman Jacob Figge Antonio Gioe Macayla Greider-Wagner Devin Jen Cody Johnson Max R. Larreur Abigail Shaw Kayanna Wolter Michael Wood Daniel K. Wu Benjamin J. O'Neal Heath M. Hagy |
author_facet |
Auriel M. V. Fournier Joseph D. Lancaster Aaron P. Yetter Christopher S. Hine Tyler Beckerman Jacob Figge Antonio Gioe Macayla Greider-Wagner Devin Jen Cody Johnson Max R. Larreur Abigail Shaw Kayanna Wolter Michael Wood Daniel K. Wu Benjamin J. O'Neal Heath M. Hagy |
author_sort |
Auriel M. V. Fournier |
title |
Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
title_short |
Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
title_full |
Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
title_fullStr |
Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
title_sort |
nest success and nest site selection of wetland birds in a restored wetland system |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/75c0de4cfc0b45a8adf0028a18b0ce47 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aurielmvfournier nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT josephdlancaster nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT aaronpyetter nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT christophershine nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT tylerbeckerman nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT jacobfigge nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT antoniogioe nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT macaylagreiderwagner nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT devinjen nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT codyjohnson nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT maxrlarreur nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT abigailshaw nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT kayannawolter nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT michaelwood nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT danielkwu nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT benjaminjoneal nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem AT heathmhagy nestsuccessandnestsiteselectionofwetlandbirdsinarestoredwetlandsystem |
_version_ |
1718426908552593408 |