Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.

The gray-to-white matter ratio (GWR) has been used to identify brain damage in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. However, Hounsfield units (HUs), the measurement of brain density on computed tomography (CT) images, may vary depending on the machine type or parameter. Therefore, differences in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jae Hun Oh, Seung Pill Choi, Jong Ho Zhu, Soo Hyun Kim, Kyu Nam Park, Chun Song Youn, Sang Hoon Oh, Han Joon Kim, Sang Hyun Park
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7605342c8b8a4de78a7664fb69527b9b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7605342c8b8a4de78a7664fb69527b9b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7605342c8b8a4de78a7664fb69527b9b2021-12-02T20:19:12ZDifferences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0258480https://doaj.org/article/7605342c8b8a4de78a7664fb69527b9b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258480https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The gray-to-white matter ratio (GWR) has been used to identify brain damage in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. However, Hounsfield units (HUs), the measurement of brain density on computed tomography (CT) images, may vary depending on the machine type or parameter. Therefore, differences in CT scanners may affect the GWR in post-cardiac arrest patients. We performed a retrospective study on comatose post-cardiac arrest patients who visited the hospital from 2007 to 2017. Two CT, Lightspeed and SOMATOM, scanners were used. Two observers independently measured the HUs of the caudate nucleus, putamen, posterior internal capsule, and corpus callosum using regions of interest. We compared the GWR calculated from the HUs measured at different CT scanners. The analysis of different scanners showed statistically significant differences in the measured HUs and GWR. The HUs and GWR of Lightspeed were measured lower than SOMATOM. The difference between the two CT scanners was also evident in groups divided by neurological prognosis. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict poor outcomes of Lightspeed was 0.798, and the cut-off value for 100% specificity was 1.172. The SOMATOM was 0.855, and the cut-off value was 1.269. The difference in scanners affects measurements and performance characteristics of the GWR in post-cardiac arrest patients. Therefore, when applying the results of the GWR study to clinical practice, reference values for each device should be presented, and an integrated plan should be prepared.Jae Hun OhSeung Pill ChoiJong Ho ZhuSoo Hyun KimKyu Nam ParkChun Song YounSang Hoon OhHan Joon KimSang Hyun ParkPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0258480 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jae Hun Oh
Seung Pill Choi
Jong Ho Zhu
Soo Hyun Kim
Kyu Nam Park
Chun Song Youn
Sang Hoon Oh
Han Joon Kim
Sang Hyun Park
Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
description The gray-to-white matter ratio (GWR) has been used to identify brain damage in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. However, Hounsfield units (HUs), the measurement of brain density on computed tomography (CT) images, may vary depending on the machine type or parameter. Therefore, differences in CT scanners may affect the GWR in post-cardiac arrest patients. We performed a retrospective study on comatose post-cardiac arrest patients who visited the hospital from 2007 to 2017. Two CT, Lightspeed and SOMATOM, scanners were used. Two observers independently measured the HUs of the caudate nucleus, putamen, posterior internal capsule, and corpus callosum using regions of interest. We compared the GWR calculated from the HUs measured at different CT scanners. The analysis of different scanners showed statistically significant differences in the measured HUs and GWR. The HUs and GWR of Lightspeed were measured lower than SOMATOM. The difference between the two CT scanners was also evident in groups divided by neurological prognosis. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict poor outcomes of Lightspeed was 0.798, and the cut-off value for 100% specificity was 1.172. The SOMATOM was 0.855, and the cut-off value was 1.269. The difference in scanners affects measurements and performance characteristics of the GWR in post-cardiac arrest patients. Therefore, when applying the results of the GWR study to clinical practice, reference values for each device should be presented, and an integrated plan should be prepared.
format article
author Jae Hun Oh
Seung Pill Choi
Jong Ho Zhu
Soo Hyun Kim
Kyu Nam Park
Chun Song Youn
Sang Hoon Oh
Han Joon Kim
Sang Hyun Park
author_facet Jae Hun Oh
Seung Pill Choi
Jong Ho Zhu
Soo Hyun Kim
Kyu Nam Park
Chun Song Youn
Sang Hoon Oh
Han Joon Kim
Sang Hyun Park
author_sort Jae Hun Oh
title Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
title_short Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
title_full Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
title_fullStr Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
title_sort differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7605342c8b8a4de78a7664fb69527b9b
work_keys_str_mv AT jaehunoh differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT seungpillchoi differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT jonghozhu differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT soohyunkim differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT kyunampark differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT chunsongyoun differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT sanghoonoh differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT hanjoonkim differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
AT sanghyunpark differencesinthegraytowhitematterratioaccordingtodifferentcomputedtomographyscannersforoutcomepredictioninpostcardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargettemperaturemanagement
_version_ 1718374233201967104