Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research

<p>This research aims to, throughout the text, analyze the product of the authors' experiences on the path followed to approach the object of study and generate theoretical approaches in a specific field of knowledge. To this end, an analytical-reflective approach was applied. The results...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nelly Meléndez, Magally Briceño
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	ES
Publicado:	Universidad Central de Venezuela 2021
Materias:	Management. Industrial management HD28-70 Business HF5001-6182
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7622b3757bac417ea7395cbd34b76cb1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7622b3757bac417ea7395cbd34b76cb1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7622b3757bac417ea7395cbd34b76cb12021-11-25T23:41:44ZConstructing the object of studies in doctoral research2542-3142https://doaj.org/article/7622b3757bac417ea7395cbd34b76cb12021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_GID/article/view/22701https://doaj.org/toc/2542-3142<p>This research aims to, throughout the text, analyze the product of the authors' experiences on the path followed to approach the object of study and generate theoretical approaches in a specific field of knowledge. To this end, an analytical-reflective approach was applied. The results reveal the research development of doctoral students, which implies transferring the different stages that start from the contextualization of reality, scientific rigorousness, and successive approaches to teleological, theoretical, methodological, and epistemic sources, with criteria of ethical rigorousness. A scientific understanding of this process is essential, which entails a clear differentiation for the support of contributions in philosophy of science, especially Popper (1976), Kuhn (1962), Lakatos (1978), and Feyerabend (1991), whose influence in the field of formal and factual sciences helped them be felt in social sciences. This research and interpretation by the authors allows them to demystify the debate of carrying out research in social sciences that are appropriate with the social and cultural context, which allows one to solve problems with scientific formality.</p> <strong>Keywords:</strong> doctoral thesis; object of study; philosophy of science; epistemology; research in social sciencesNelly MeléndezMagally BriceñoUniversidad Central de VenezuelaarticleManagement. Industrial managementHD28-70BusinessHF5001-6182ESRevista Gestión I+D, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 146-166 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	ES
topic	Management. Industrial management HD28-70 Business HF5001-6182
spellingShingle	Management. Industrial management HD28-70 Business HF5001-6182 Nelly Meléndez Magally Briceño Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
description	<p>This research aims to, throughout the text, analyze the product of the authors' experiences on the path followed to approach the object of study and generate theoretical approaches in a specific field of knowledge. To this end, an analytical-reflective approach was applied. The results reveal the research development of doctoral students, which implies transferring the different stages that start from the contextualization of reality, scientific rigorousness, and successive approaches to teleological, theoretical, methodological, and epistemic sources, with criteria of ethical rigorousness. A scientific understanding of this process is essential, which entails a clear differentiation for the support of contributions in philosophy of science, especially Popper (1976), Kuhn (1962), Lakatos (1978), and Feyerabend (1991), whose influence in the field of formal and factual sciences helped them be felt in social sciences. This research and interpretation by the authors allows them to demystify the debate of carrying out research in social sciences that are appropriate with the social and cultural context, which allows one to solve problems with scientific formality.</p> <strong>Keywords:</strong> doctoral thesis; object of study; philosophy of science; epistemology; research in social sciences
format	article
author	Nelly Meléndez Magally Briceño
author_facet	Nelly Meléndez Magally Briceño
author_sort	Nelly Meléndez
title	Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
title_short	Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
title_full	Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
title_fullStr	Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
title_full_unstemmed	Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
title_sort	constructing the object of studies in doctoral research
publisher	Universidad Central de Venezuela
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7622b3757bac417ea7395cbd34b76cb1
work_keys_str_mv	AT nellymelendez constructingtheobjectofstudiesindoctoralresearch AT magallybriceno constructingtheobjectofstudiesindoctoralresearch
_version_	1718410039075536896

Constructing the object of studies in doctoral research

Ejemplares similares