$Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective$
Código QR

Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective

Jianan Zhang, Yong Fan, Xin He, Jinpeng Du, Dingjun Hao Department of Spine Surgery, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, Shaan’xi Province, China Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bracing after percutan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhang J, Fan Y, He X, Du J, Hao D
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:	Percutaneous vertebroplasty Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures Brace Geriatrics RC952-954.6
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/765c3572d4f540eeada6741485c2183b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:765c3572d4f540eeada6741485c2183b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:765c3572d4f540eeada6741485c2183b2021-12-02T05:07:07ZBracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/765c3572d4f540eeada6741485c2183b2019-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/bracing-after-percutaneous-vertebroplasty-for-thoracolumbar-osteoporot-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Jianan Zhang, Yong Fan, Xin He, Jinpeng Du, Dingjun Hao Department of Spine Surgery, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, Shaan’xi Province, China Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods: This is a retrospective study where we recruited 138 patients with single-level thoracolumbar OVCF who underwent PVP from January 2018 to March 2018 without bracing after PVP (Group A). The visual analog score (VAS) and vertebral body compression ratio (VCR) were recorded at preoperation, on the second day, at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after operation. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was recorded at preoperation, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after operation. Propensity score matching identified 138 historical patients (Group B) as controls, who used rigid brace for 3 weeks after the surgery, from January 2017 to December 2017 using six independent variables (preoperation): age, sex, VAS, ODI, bone mineral density, and body mass index. The indicators and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with preoperation, VAS and VCR were significantly improved (P<0.05) in both groups on the second day after operation. At 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after PVP operation, ODI, VAS, and VCR were all significantly improved than at preoperation (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in VAS and VCR on the second day, at 1 month and 6 months after PVP (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups A and B in ODI at 2 weeks and 6 months after operation (P>0.05) but ODI for Group B at 1 month after operation was significantly higher than Group A (P<0.05). Eleven cases in Group A and 13 cases in Group B had poor pain relief on the second day after operation, and there were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the two subgroups at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after PVP. There were no significant differences in the collapse and refracture rates between the two groups. Conclusion: In summary, in terms of quality of life and complications after operation, postoperative bracing did not result in improved outcomes. Presence or absence of bracing did not relieve postoperative residual pain. In contrast, bracing for 3 weeks after operation reduced the quality of life in the short term. Keywords: percutaneous vertebroplasty, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, braceZhang JFan YHe XDu JHao DDove Medical PressarticlePercutaneous vertebroplastyOsteoporotic vertebral compression fracturesBraceGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 14, Pp 265-270 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Percutaneous vertebroplasty Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures Brace Geriatrics RC952-954.6
spellingShingle	Percutaneous vertebroplasty Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures Brace Geriatrics RC952-954.6 Zhang J Fan Y He X Du J Hao D Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
description	Jianan Zhang, Yong Fan, Xin He, Jinpeng Du, Dingjun Hao Department of Spine Surgery, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, Shaan’xi Province, China Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods: This is a retrospective study where we recruited 138 patients with single-level thoracolumbar OVCF who underwent PVP from January 2018 to March 2018 without bracing after PVP (Group A). The visual analog score (VAS) and vertebral body compression ratio (VCR) were recorded at preoperation, on the second day, at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after operation. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was recorded at preoperation, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after operation. Propensity score matching identified 138 historical patients (Group B) as controls, who used rigid brace for 3 weeks after the surgery, from January 2017 to December 2017 using six independent variables (preoperation): age, sex, VAS, ODI, bone mineral density, and body mass index. The indicators and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with preoperation, VAS and VCR were significantly improved (P<0.05) in both groups on the second day after operation. At 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after PVP operation, ODI, VAS, and VCR were all significantly improved than at preoperation (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in VAS and VCR on the second day, at 1 month and 6 months after PVP (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups A and B in ODI at 2 weeks and 6 months after operation (P>0.05) but ODI for Group B at 1 month after operation was significantly higher than Group A (P<0.05). Eleven cases in Group A and 13 cases in Group B had poor pain relief on the second day after operation, and there were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the two subgroups at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months after PVP. There were no significant differences in the collapse and refracture rates between the two groups. Conclusion: In summary, in terms of quality of life and complications after operation, postoperative bracing did not result in improved outcomes. Presence or absence of bracing did not relieve postoperative residual pain. In contrast, bracing for 3 weeks after operation reduced the quality of life in the short term. Keywords: percutaneous vertebroplasty, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, brace
format	article
author	Zhang J Fan Y He X Du J Hao D
author_facet	Zhang J Fan Y He X Du J Hao D
author_sort	Zhang J
title	Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
title_short	Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
title_full	Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
title_fullStr	Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
title_full_unstemmed	Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
title_sort	bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/765c3572d4f540eeada6741485c2183b
work_keys_str_mv	AT zhangj bracingafterpercutaneousvertebroplastyforthoracolumbarosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswasnoteffective AT fany bracingafterpercutaneousvertebroplastyforthoracolumbarosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswasnoteffective AT hex bracingafterpercutaneousvertebroplastyforthoracolumbarosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswasnoteffective AT duj bracingafterpercutaneousvertebroplastyforthoracolumbarosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswasnoteffective AT haod bracingafterpercutaneousvertebroplastyforthoracolumbarosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfractureswasnoteffective
_version_	1718400597491712000

Bracing after percutaneous vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was not effective

Ejemplares similares