TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS

The article deals with the analysis of S. Botros’s book, which found a contradiction in the motivation argument by D. Hume. The author proves that S. Botros’s conclusions were unconvincing and at the same time tries to find the source of ideas given in her book. He supposes that they were caused by...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oleg A. Zelenskiy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7664dfafcf4549cc9add71986f9ee82f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:The article deals with the analysis of S. Botros’s book, which found a contradiction in the motivation argument by D. Hume. The author proves that S. Botros’s conclusions were unconvincing and at the same time tries to find the source of ideas given in her book. He supposes that they were caused by the wrong interpretation of one of the central notions by D. Hume, i. e. the idea of belief. An attempt was made to protect the irrational interpretation of this notion. It was shown that Hume’s belief in its pure form has pre-reflexive essence prior to rationality. This pre-reflexive belief but not intellect gives rise to morale, according to D. Hume and this belief could free us from extreme skepticism.