TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS

The article deals with the analysis of S. Botros’s book, which found a contradiction in the motivation argument by D. Hume. The author proves that S. Botros’s conclusions were unconvincing and at the same time tries to find the source of ideas given in her book. He supposes that they were caused by...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oleg A. Zelenskiy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7664dfafcf4549cc9add71986f9ee82f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7664dfafcf4549cc9add71986f9ee82f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7664dfafcf4549cc9add71986f9ee82f2021-11-15T05:20:45ZTO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS2413-28292587-925110.21686/2413-2829-2017-1-163-170https://doaj.org/article/7664dfafcf4549cc9add71986f9ee82f2017-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/257https://doaj.org/toc/2413-2829https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9251The article deals with the analysis of S. Botros’s book, which found a contradiction in the motivation argument by D. Hume. The author proves that S. Botros’s conclusions were unconvincing and at the same time tries to find the source of ideas given in her book. He supposes that they were caused by the wrong interpretation of one of the central notions by D. Hume, i. e. the idea of belief. An attempt was made to protect the irrational interpretation of this notion. It was shown that Hume’s belief in its pure form has pre-reflexive essence prior to rationality. This pre-reflexive belief but not intellect gives rise to morale, according to D. Hume and this belief could free us from extreme skepticism.Oleg A. ZelenskiyPlekhanov Russian University of Economicsarticled. humemotivation argumentintellect inertnesshabitEconomics as a scienceHB71-74RUВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова, Vol 0, Iss 1, Pp 163-170 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic d. hume
motivation argument
intellect inertness
habit
Economics as a science
HB71-74
spellingShingle d. hume
motivation argument
intellect inertness
habit
Economics as a science
HB71-74
Oleg A. Zelenskiy
TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS
description The article deals with the analysis of S. Botros’s book, which found a contradiction in the motivation argument by D. Hume. The author proves that S. Botros’s conclusions were unconvincing and at the same time tries to find the source of ideas given in her book. He supposes that they were caused by the wrong interpretation of one of the central notions by D. Hume, i. e. the idea of belief. An attempt was made to protect the irrational interpretation of this notion. It was shown that Hume’s belief in its pure form has pre-reflexive essence prior to rationality. This pre-reflexive belief but not intellect gives rise to morale, according to D. Hume and this belief could free us from extreme skepticism.
format article
author Oleg A. Zelenskiy
author_facet Oleg A. Zelenskiy
author_sort Oleg A. Zelenskiy
title TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS
title_short TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS
title_full TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS
title_fullStr TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS
title_full_unstemmed TO SAVE HUME OR WAS THERE ANY CONTRADICTION IN ONE OF HIS CENTRAL ARGUMENTS
title_sort to save hume or was there any contradiction in one of his central arguments
publisher Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/7664dfafcf4549cc9add71986f9ee82f
work_keys_str_mv AT olegazelenskiy tosavehumeorwasthereanycontradictioninoneofhiscentralarguments
_version_ 1718428754255020032