Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>As well as being a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension is also a health condition in its own right. Risk prediction models may be of value in identifying those individuals at risk of developing hypertension who are likely to benefit most from intervent...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui, G David Batty, Mika Kivimäki, Andre P Kengne
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/768f5fe6054044138f484d01d53b0247
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:768f5fe6054044138f484d01d53b0247
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:768f5fe6054044138f484d01d53b02472021-11-18T07:38:27ZRisk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0067370https://doaj.org/article/768f5fe6054044138f484d01d53b02472013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23861760/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>As well as being a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension is also a health condition in its own right. Risk prediction models may be of value in identifying those individuals at risk of developing hypertension who are likely to benefit most from interventions.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>To synthesize existing evidence on the performance of these models, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE; examined bibliographies of retrieved articles; contacted experts in the field; and searched our own files. Dual review of identified studies was conducted. Included studies had to report on the development, validation, or impact analysis of a hypertension risk prediction model. For each publication, information was extracted on study design and characteristics, predictors, model discrimination, calibration and reclassification ability, validation and impact analysis. Eleven studies reporting on 15 different hypertension prediction risk models were identified. Age, sex, body mass index, diabetes status, and blood pressure variables were the most common predictor variables included in models. Most risk models had acceptable-to-good discriminatory ability (C-statistic>0.70) in the derivation sample. Calibration was less commonly assessed, but overall acceptable. Two hypertension risk models, the Framingham and Hopkins, have been externally validated, displaying acceptable-to-good discrimination, and C-statistic ranging from 0.71 to 0.81. Lack of individual-level data precluded analyses of the risk models in subgroups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The discrimination ability of existing hypertension risk prediction tools is acceptable, but the impact of using these tools on prescriptions and outcomes of hypertension prevention is unclear.Justin B Echouffo-TcheuguiG David BattyMika KivimäkiAndre P KengnePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 7, p e67370 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
Andre P Kengne
Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
description <h4>Background</h4>As well as being a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension is also a health condition in its own right. Risk prediction models may be of value in identifying those individuals at risk of developing hypertension who are likely to benefit most from interventions.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>To synthesize existing evidence on the performance of these models, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE; examined bibliographies of retrieved articles; contacted experts in the field; and searched our own files. Dual review of identified studies was conducted. Included studies had to report on the development, validation, or impact analysis of a hypertension risk prediction model. For each publication, information was extracted on study design and characteristics, predictors, model discrimination, calibration and reclassification ability, validation and impact analysis. Eleven studies reporting on 15 different hypertension prediction risk models were identified. Age, sex, body mass index, diabetes status, and blood pressure variables were the most common predictor variables included in models. Most risk models had acceptable-to-good discriminatory ability (C-statistic>0.70) in the derivation sample. Calibration was less commonly assessed, but overall acceptable. Two hypertension risk models, the Framingham and Hopkins, have been externally validated, displaying acceptable-to-good discrimination, and C-statistic ranging from 0.71 to 0.81. Lack of individual-level data precluded analyses of the risk models in subgroups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The discrimination ability of existing hypertension risk prediction tools is acceptable, but the impact of using these tools on prescriptions and outcomes of hypertension prevention is unclear.
format article
author Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
Andre P Kengne
author_facet Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
Andre P Kengne
author_sort Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
title Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
title_short Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
title_full Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
title_fullStr Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
title_sort risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/768f5fe6054044138f484d01d53b0247
work_keys_str_mv AT justinbechouffotcheugui riskmodelstopredicthypertensionasystematicreview
AT gdavidbatty riskmodelstopredicthypertensionasystematicreview
AT mikakivimaki riskmodelstopredicthypertensionasystematicreview
AT andrepkengne riskmodelstopredicthypertensionasystematicreview
_version_ 1718423168609157120