Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice

Information about the distribution of a study object (e.g., species or habitat) is essential in face of increasing pressure from land or sea use, and climate change. Distribution models are instrumental for acquiring such information, but also encumbered by uncertainties caused by different sources...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anders Bryn, Trine Bekkby, Eli Rinde, Hege Gundersen, Rune Halvorsen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7696e8378fc94555b9b031a4d3661112
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7696e8378fc94555b9b031a4d3661112
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7696e8378fc94555b9b031a4d36611122021-11-18T09:54:31ZReliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice2296-701X10.3389/fevo.2021.658713https://doaj.org/article/7696e8378fc94555b9b031a4d36611122021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.658713/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-701XInformation about the distribution of a study object (e.g., species or habitat) is essential in face of increasing pressure from land or sea use, and climate change. Distribution models are instrumental for acquiring such information, but also encumbered by uncertainties caused by different sources of error, bias and inaccuracy that need to be dealt with. In this paper we identify the most common sources of uncertainties and link them to different phases in the modeling process. Our aim is to outline the implications of these uncertainties for the reliability of distribution models and to summarize the precautions needed to be taken. We performed a step-by-step assessment of errors, biases and inaccuracies related to the five main steps in a standard distribution modeling process: (1) ecological understanding, assumptions and problem formulation; (2) data collection and preparation; (3) choice of modeling method, model tuning and parameterization; (4) evaluation of models; and, finally, (5) implementation and use. Our synthesis highlights the need to consider the entire distribution modeling process when the reliability and applicability of the models are assessed. A key recommendation is to evaluate the model properly by use of a dataset that is collected independently of the training data. We support initiatives to establish international protocols and open geodatabases for distribution models.Anders BrynAnders BrynTrine BekkbyTrine BekkbyEli RindeHege GundersenRune HalvorsenFrontiers Media S.A.articleassumptionsbiasdistribution modelingequilibriumerrorsinaccuraciesEvolutionQH359-425EcologyQH540-549.5ENFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic assumptions
bias
distribution modeling
equilibrium
errors
inaccuracies
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle assumptions
bias
distribution modeling
equilibrium
errors
inaccuracies
Evolution
QH359-425
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Anders Bryn
Anders Bryn
Trine Bekkby
Trine Bekkby
Eli Rinde
Hege Gundersen
Rune Halvorsen
Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice
description Information about the distribution of a study object (e.g., species or habitat) is essential in face of increasing pressure from land or sea use, and climate change. Distribution models are instrumental for acquiring such information, but also encumbered by uncertainties caused by different sources of error, bias and inaccuracy that need to be dealt with. In this paper we identify the most common sources of uncertainties and link them to different phases in the modeling process. Our aim is to outline the implications of these uncertainties for the reliability of distribution models and to summarize the precautions needed to be taken. We performed a step-by-step assessment of errors, biases and inaccuracies related to the five main steps in a standard distribution modeling process: (1) ecological understanding, assumptions and problem formulation; (2) data collection and preparation; (3) choice of modeling method, model tuning and parameterization; (4) evaluation of models; and, finally, (5) implementation and use. Our synthesis highlights the need to consider the entire distribution modeling process when the reliability and applicability of the models are assessed. A key recommendation is to evaluate the model properly by use of a dataset that is collected independently of the training data. We support initiatives to establish international protocols and open geodatabases for distribution models.
format article
author Anders Bryn
Anders Bryn
Trine Bekkby
Trine Bekkby
Eli Rinde
Hege Gundersen
Rune Halvorsen
author_facet Anders Bryn
Anders Bryn
Trine Bekkby
Trine Bekkby
Eli Rinde
Hege Gundersen
Rune Halvorsen
author_sort Anders Bryn
title Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice
title_short Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice
title_full Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice
title_fullStr Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice
title_full_unstemmed Reliability in Distribution Modeling—A Synthesis and Step-by-Step Guidelines for Improved Practice
title_sort reliability in distribution modeling—a synthesis and step-by-step guidelines for improved practice
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7696e8378fc94555b9b031a4d3661112
work_keys_str_mv AT andersbryn reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
AT andersbryn reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
AT trinebekkby reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
AT trinebekkby reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
AT elirinde reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
AT hegegundersen reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
AT runehalvorsen reliabilityindistributionmodelingasynthesisandstepbystepguidelinesforimprovedpractice
_version_ 1718420853332377600