Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.

<h4>Objective</h4>An evidence regarding which bony flap for reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumour resection is associated with the highest survival rate is still lacking. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to guide surgeons selecting which vascularized osseous flap is...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah, Taghrid Aldhohrah, Ahmed Abdelrehem, Karim Ahmed Sakran, Hyat Ahmad, Hamada Mahran, Faisal Abu-Lohom, Hanfu Su, Ying Fang, Liping Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7697ccdb8bad4a719e09356650b383d7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7697ccdb8bad4a719e09356650b383d7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7697ccdb8bad4a719e09356650b383d72021-12-02T20:16:37ZSurvival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257457https://doaj.org/article/7697ccdb8bad4a719e09356650b383d72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257457https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4>An evidence regarding which bony flap for reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumour resection is associated with the highest survival rate is still lacking. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to guide surgeons selecting which vascularized osseous flap is associated with the highest survival rate for mandibular reconstruction.<h4>Methods</h4>From inception to March 2021, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane library were searched to identify the eligible studies. The outcome variable was the flap survival rate. The Bayesian NMA accompanied by a random effect model and 95% credible intervals (CrI) was calculated.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-two studies with a total of 1513 patients, comparing four osseous flaps namely fibula free flap (FFF), deep circumferential iliac artery flap (DCIA), scapula flap, and osteocutaneous radial forearm flap (ORFF) were included. The respective survival rates of FFF, DCIA, Scapula, and ORFF were 94.50%, 93.12%, 97%, and 95.95%. The NMA failed to show a statistically significant difference between all comparators (FFF versus DCIA (Odd ratio, 1.8; CrI, 0.58,5.0); FFF versus ORFF (Odd ratio, 0.57; CrI, 0.077; 2.9); FFF versus scapula flap (Odd ratio, 0.25; CrI, 0.026; 1.5); DCIA versus ORFF (Odd ratio, 0.32; CrI, 0.037; 2.1); DCIA versus scapula flap (Odd ratio, 0.14; CrI, 0.015; 1.1) and ORFF versus scapula flap (Odd ratio, 2.3; CrI, 0.16; 34)).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Within the limitations of the current NMA, FFF, DCIA, Scapula, and ORFF showed a comparable survival rate for mandibular reconstruction. Although the scapula flap reported the highest survival rate compared to other osseous flaps for mandibular reconstruction; however, the decision making when choosing an osseous flap should be based on many factors rather than simply flap survival rate.Mubarak Ahmed MashrahTaghrid AldhohrahAhmed AbdelrehemKarim Ahmed SakranHyat AhmadHamada MahranFaisal Abu-LohomHanfu SuYing FangLiping WangPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0257457 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah
Taghrid Aldhohrah
Ahmed Abdelrehem
Karim Ahmed Sakran
Hyat Ahmad
Hamada Mahran
Faisal Abu-Lohom
Hanfu Su
Ying Fang
Liping Wang
Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.
description <h4>Objective</h4>An evidence regarding which bony flap for reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumour resection is associated with the highest survival rate is still lacking. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to guide surgeons selecting which vascularized osseous flap is associated with the highest survival rate for mandibular reconstruction.<h4>Methods</h4>From inception to March 2021, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane library were searched to identify the eligible studies. The outcome variable was the flap survival rate. The Bayesian NMA accompanied by a random effect model and 95% credible intervals (CrI) was calculated.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-two studies with a total of 1513 patients, comparing four osseous flaps namely fibula free flap (FFF), deep circumferential iliac artery flap (DCIA), scapula flap, and osteocutaneous radial forearm flap (ORFF) were included. The respective survival rates of FFF, DCIA, Scapula, and ORFF were 94.50%, 93.12%, 97%, and 95.95%. The NMA failed to show a statistically significant difference between all comparators (FFF versus DCIA (Odd ratio, 1.8; CrI, 0.58,5.0); FFF versus ORFF (Odd ratio, 0.57; CrI, 0.077; 2.9); FFF versus scapula flap (Odd ratio, 0.25; CrI, 0.026; 1.5); DCIA versus ORFF (Odd ratio, 0.32; CrI, 0.037; 2.1); DCIA versus scapula flap (Odd ratio, 0.14; CrI, 0.015; 1.1) and ORFF versus scapula flap (Odd ratio, 2.3; CrI, 0.16; 34)).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Within the limitations of the current NMA, FFF, DCIA, Scapula, and ORFF showed a comparable survival rate for mandibular reconstruction. Although the scapula flap reported the highest survival rate compared to other osseous flaps for mandibular reconstruction; however, the decision making when choosing an osseous flap should be based on many factors rather than simply flap survival rate.
format article
author Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah
Taghrid Aldhohrah
Ahmed Abdelrehem
Karim Ahmed Sakran
Hyat Ahmad
Hamada Mahran
Faisal Abu-Lohom
Hanfu Su
Ying Fang
Liping Wang
author_facet Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah
Taghrid Aldhohrah
Ahmed Abdelrehem
Karim Ahmed Sakran
Hyat Ahmad
Hamada Mahran
Faisal Abu-Lohom
Hanfu Su
Ying Fang
Liping Wang
author_sort Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah
title Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.
title_short Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.
title_full Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: A network meta-analysis.
title_sort survival of vascularized osseous flaps in mandibular reconstruction: a network meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7697ccdb8bad4a719e09356650b383d7
work_keys_str_mv AT mubarakahmedmashrah survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT taghridaldhohrah survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT ahmedabdelrehem survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT karimahmedsakran survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT hyatahmad survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT hamadamahran survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT faisalabulohom survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT hanfusu survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yingfang survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
AT lipingwang survivalofvascularizedosseousflapsinmandibularreconstructionanetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718374475112644608