Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?

Abstract There has been growing interest in using wearable physiological monitors to passively detect the signals of distress (i.e., increases in autonomic arousal measured through increased electrodermal activity [EDA]) that may be imminently associated with suicidal thoughts. Before using these mo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evan M. Kleiman, Kate H. Bentley, Joseph S. Maimone, Hye-In Sarah Lee, Erin N. Kilbury, Rebecca G. Fortgang, Kelly L. Zuromski, Jeff C. Huffman, Matthew K. Nock
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/76a105f12dcc4466a92b6d78df9bb77c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:76a105f12dcc4466a92b6d78df9bb77c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:76a105f12dcc4466a92b6d78df9bb77c2021-12-05T12:07:49ZCan passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?10.1038/s41398-021-01730-y2158-3188https://doaj.org/article/76a105f12dcc4466a92b6d78df9bb77c2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01730-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2158-3188Abstract There has been growing interest in using wearable physiological monitors to passively detect the signals of distress (i.e., increases in autonomic arousal measured through increased electrodermal activity [EDA]) that may be imminently associated with suicidal thoughts. Before using these monitors in advanced applications such as creating suicide risk detection algorithms or just-in-time interventions, several preliminary questions must be answered. Specifically, we lack information about whether: (1) EDA concurrently and prospectively predicts suicidal thinking and (2) data on EDA adds to the ability to predict the presence and severity of suicidal thinking over and above self-reports of emotional distress. Participants were suicidal psychiatric inpatients (n = 25, 56% female, M age = 33.48 years) who completed six daily assessments of negative affect and suicidal thinking duration of their psychiatric inpatient stay and 28 days post-discharge, and wore on their wrist a physiological monitor (Empatica Embrace) that passively detects autonomic activity. We found that physiological data alone both concurrently and prospectively predicted periods of suicidal thinking, but models with physiological data alone had the poorest fit. Adding physiological data to self-report models improved fit when the outcome variable was severity of suicidal thinking, but worsened model fit when the outcome was presence of suicidal thinking. When predicting severity of suicidal thinking, physiological data improved model fit more for models with non-overlapping self-report data (i.e., low arousal negative affect) than for overlapping self-report data (i.e., high arousal negative affect). These findings suggest that physiological data, under certain contexts (e.g., when combined with self-report data), may be useful in better predicting—and ultimately, preventing—acute increases in suicide risk. However, some cautious optimism is warranted since physiological data do not always improve our ability to predict suicidal thinking.Evan M. KleimanKate H. BentleyJoseph S. MaimoneHye-In Sarah LeeErin N. KilburyRebecca G. FortgangKelly L. ZuromskiJeff C. HuffmanMatthew K. NockNature Publishing GrouparticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENTranslational Psychiatry, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Evan M. Kleiman
Kate H. Bentley
Joseph S. Maimone
Hye-In Sarah Lee
Erin N. Kilbury
Rebecca G. Fortgang
Kelly L. Zuromski
Jeff C. Huffman
Matthew K. Nock
Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
description Abstract There has been growing interest in using wearable physiological monitors to passively detect the signals of distress (i.e., increases in autonomic arousal measured through increased electrodermal activity [EDA]) that may be imminently associated with suicidal thoughts. Before using these monitors in advanced applications such as creating suicide risk detection algorithms or just-in-time interventions, several preliminary questions must be answered. Specifically, we lack information about whether: (1) EDA concurrently and prospectively predicts suicidal thinking and (2) data on EDA adds to the ability to predict the presence and severity of suicidal thinking over and above self-reports of emotional distress. Participants were suicidal psychiatric inpatients (n = 25, 56% female, M age = 33.48 years) who completed six daily assessments of negative affect and suicidal thinking duration of their psychiatric inpatient stay and 28 days post-discharge, and wore on their wrist a physiological monitor (Empatica Embrace) that passively detects autonomic activity. We found that physiological data alone both concurrently and prospectively predicted periods of suicidal thinking, but models with physiological data alone had the poorest fit. Adding physiological data to self-report models improved fit when the outcome variable was severity of suicidal thinking, but worsened model fit when the outcome was presence of suicidal thinking. When predicting severity of suicidal thinking, physiological data improved model fit more for models with non-overlapping self-report data (i.e., low arousal negative affect) than for overlapping self-report data (i.e., high arousal negative affect). These findings suggest that physiological data, under certain contexts (e.g., when combined with self-report data), may be useful in better predicting—and ultimately, preventing—acute increases in suicide risk. However, some cautious optimism is warranted since physiological data do not always improve our ability to predict suicidal thinking.
format article
author Evan M. Kleiman
Kate H. Bentley
Joseph S. Maimone
Hye-In Sarah Lee
Erin N. Kilbury
Rebecca G. Fortgang
Kelly L. Zuromski
Jeff C. Huffman
Matthew K. Nock
author_facet Evan M. Kleiman
Kate H. Bentley
Joseph S. Maimone
Hye-In Sarah Lee
Erin N. Kilbury
Rebecca G. Fortgang
Kelly L. Zuromski
Jeff C. Huffman
Matthew K. Nock
author_sort Evan M. Kleiman
title Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
title_short Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
title_full Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
title_fullStr Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
title_full_unstemmed Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
title_sort can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/76a105f12dcc4466a92b6d78df9bb77c
work_keys_str_mv AT evanmkleiman canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT katehbentley canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT josephsmaimone canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT hyeinsarahlee canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT erinnkilbury canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT rebeccagfortgang canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT kellylzuromski canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT jeffchuffman canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
AT matthewknock canpassivemeasurementofphysiologicaldistresshelpbetterpredictsuicidalthinking
_version_ 1718372200433582080