Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security

Abstract Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this sys...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Selena Ahmed, Teresa Warne, Erin Smith, Hannah Goemann, Greta Linse, Mark Greenwood, Jeremy Kedziora, Meghan Sapp, Debra Kraner, Kelli Roemer, Julia H. Haggerty, Meghann Jarchow, David Swanson, Benjamin Poulter, Paul C. Stoy
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Food processing and manufacture TP368-456
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/76e0ca05342244d2832279eef265944f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:76e0ca05342244d2832279eef265944f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:76e0ca05342244d2832279eef265944f2021-12-02T14:42:57ZSystematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security10.1038/s41538-021-00091-62396-8370https://doaj.org/article/76e0ca05342244d2832279eef265944f2021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6https://doaj.org/toc/2396-8370Abstract Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value = 0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value < 0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value = 0.001), spatial scale (P value < 0.001), and temporal scale (P value = 0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals.Selena AhmedTeresa WarneErin SmithHannah GoemannGreta LinseMark GreenwoodJeremy KedzioraMeghan SappDebra KranerKelli RoemerJulia H. HaggertyMeghann JarchowDavid SwansonBenjamin PoulterPaul C. StoyNature PortfolioarticleNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641Food processing and manufactureTP368-456ENnpj Science of Food, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Food processing and manufacture TP368-456
spellingShingle	Nutrition. Foods and food supply TX341-641 Food processing and manufacture TP368-456 Selena Ahmed Teresa Warne Erin Smith Hannah Goemann Greta Linse Mark Greenwood Jeremy Kedziora Meghan Sapp Debra Kraner Kelli Roemer Julia H. Haggerty Meghann Jarchow David Swanson Benjamin Poulter Paul C. Stoy Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
description	Abstract Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value = 0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value < 0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value = 0.001), spatial scale (P value < 0.001), and temporal scale (P value = 0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals.
format	article
author	Selena Ahmed Teresa Warne Erin Smith Hannah Goemann Greta Linse Mark Greenwood Jeremy Kedziora Meghan Sapp Debra Kraner Kelli Roemer Julia H. Haggerty Meghann Jarchow David Swanson Benjamin Poulter Paul C. Stoy
author_facet	Selena Ahmed Teresa Warne Erin Smith Hannah Goemann Greta Linse Mark Greenwood Jeremy Kedziora Meghan Sapp Debra Kraner Kelli Roemer Julia H. Haggerty Meghann Jarchow David Swanson Benjamin Poulter Paul C. Stoy
author_sort	Selena Ahmed
title	Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_short	Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_full	Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_fullStr	Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_full_unstemmed	Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
title_sort	systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/76e0ca05342244d2832279eef265944f
work_keys_str_mv	AT selenaahmed systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT teresawarne systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT erinsmith systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT hannahgoemann systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT gretalinse systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT markgreenwood systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT jeremykedziora systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT meghansapp systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT debrakraner systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT kelliroemer systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT juliahhaggerty systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT meghannjarchow systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT davidswanson systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT benjaminpoulter systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity AT paulcstoy systematicreviewoneffectsofbioenergyfromedibleversusinediblefeedstocksonfoodsecurity
_version_	1718389576833171456

Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security

Ejemplares similares