Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry
Abstract Background With the increasing attention for the role of General Practitioners (GPs) after cancer treatment, it is important to better understand the involvement of GPs following prostate cancer treatment. This study investigates factors associated with GP contact during follow-up of prosta...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/77060aefd4e04ae78ec652fcd1950ac0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:77060aefd4e04ae78ec652fcd1950ac0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:77060aefd4e04ae78ec652fcd1950ac02021-11-08T11:04:09ZType of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry10.1186/s12875-021-01567-w1471-2296https://doaj.org/article/77060aefd4e04ae78ec652fcd1950ac02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01567-whttps://doaj.org/toc/1471-2296Abstract Background With the increasing attention for the role of General Practitioners (GPs) after cancer treatment, it is important to better understand the involvement of GPs following prostate cancer treatment. This study investigates factors associated with GP contact during follow-up of prostate cancer survivors, such as patient, treatment and symptom variables, and satisfaction with, trust in, and appraised knowledge of GPs. Methods Of 787 prostate cancer survivors diagnosed between 2007 and 2013, and selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, 557 (71%) responded to the invitation to complete a questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate which variables were associated with GP contact during follow- up. Results In total, 200 (42%) prostate cancer survivors had contact with their GP during follow-up, and 76 (16%) survivors preferred more contact. Survivors who had an intermediate versus low educational level (OR = 2.0) were more likely to have had contact with their GP during follow-up. Survivors treated with surgery (OR = 2.8) or hormonal therapy (OR = 3.5) were also more likely to seek follow-up care from their GP compared to survivors who were treated with active surveillance. Patient reported bowel symptoms (OR = 1.4), hormonal symptoms (OR = 1.4), use of incontinence aids (OR = 1.6), and being satisfied with their GP (OR = 9.5) were also significantly associated with GP contact during follow-up. Conclusions Education, treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction were associated with GP contact during prostate cancer follow-up. These findings highlight the potential for adverse side-effects to be managed in primary care. In light of future changes in cancer care, evaluating prostate cancer follow-up in primary care remains important.Barbara M. WollersheimMies van EenbergenKristel M. van AsseltLaurent M. C. L. FossionEvert L. KoldewijnJorg R. OddensEric H. OomensBart P. WijsmanLonneke V. van de Poll-FranseNicole P. M. EzendamBMCarticleProstate cancer survivorsGeneral practitionerPrimary healthcare contactFollow-upMedicine (General)R5-920ENBMC Family Practice, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Prostate cancer survivors General practitioner Primary healthcare contact Follow-up Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
Prostate cancer survivors General practitioner Primary healthcare contact Follow-up Medicine (General) R5-920 Barbara M. Wollersheim Mies van Eenbergen Kristel M. van Asselt Laurent M. C. L. Fossion Evert L. Koldewijn Jorg R. Oddens Eric H. Oomens Bart P. Wijsman Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse Nicole P. M. Ezendam Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry |
description |
Abstract Background With the increasing attention for the role of General Practitioners (GPs) after cancer treatment, it is important to better understand the involvement of GPs following prostate cancer treatment. This study investigates factors associated with GP contact during follow-up of prostate cancer survivors, such as patient, treatment and symptom variables, and satisfaction with, trust in, and appraised knowledge of GPs. Methods Of 787 prostate cancer survivors diagnosed between 2007 and 2013, and selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, 557 (71%) responded to the invitation to complete a questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate which variables were associated with GP contact during follow- up. Results In total, 200 (42%) prostate cancer survivors had contact with their GP during follow-up, and 76 (16%) survivors preferred more contact. Survivors who had an intermediate versus low educational level (OR = 2.0) were more likely to have had contact with their GP during follow-up. Survivors treated with surgery (OR = 2.8) or hormonal therapy (OR = 3.5) were also more likely to seek follow-up care from their GP compared to survivors who were treated with active surveillance. Patient reported bowel symptoms (OR = 1.4), hormonal symptoms (OR = 1.4), use of incontinence aids (OR = 1.6), and being satisfied with their GP (OR = 9.5) were also significantly associated with GP contact during follow-up. Conclusions Education, treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction were associated with GP contact during prostate cancer follow-up. These findings highlight the potential for adverse side-effects to be managed in primary care. In light of future changes in cancer care, evaluating prostate cancer follow-up in primary care remains important. |
format |
article |
author |
Barbara M. Wollersheim Mies van Eenbergen Kristel M. van Asselt Laurent M. C. L. Fossion Evert L. Koldewijn Jorg R. Oddens Eric H. Oomens Bart P. Wijsman Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse Nicole P. M. Ezendam |
author_facet |
Barbara M. Wollersheim Mies van Eenbergen Kristel M. van Asselt Laurent M. C. L. Fossion Evert L. Koldewijn Jorg R. Oddens Eric H. Oomens Bart P. Wijsman Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse Nicole P. M. Ezendam |
author_sort |
Barbara M. Wollersheim |
title |
Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry |
title_short |
Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry |
title_full |
Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry |
title_fullStr |
Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based PROFILES registry |
title_sort |
type of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction play an important role in primary care contact during prostate cancer follow-up: results from the population-based profiles registry |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/77060aefd4e04ae78ec652fcd1950ac0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barbaramwollersheim typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT miesvaneenbergen typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT kristelmvanasselt typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT laurentmclfossion typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT evertlkoldewijn typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT jorgroddens typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT erichoomens typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT bartpwijsman typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT lonnekevvandepollfranse typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry AT nicolepmezendam typeoftreatmentsymptomsandpatientsatisfactionplayanimportantroleinprimarycarecontactduringprostatecancerfollowupresultsfromthepopulationbasedprofilesregistry |
_version_ |
1718442438850248704 |