Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews

Abstract Background We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of methodological challenges in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion (DPHP)-measures. Methods We conducted an overview of reviews searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Database of Promo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yana Seleznova, Adrienne Alayli, Stephanie Stock, Dirk Müller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/770617a8816b4e2c8debd6c52ce94bf1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:770617a8816b4e2c8debd6c52ce94bf1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:770617a8816b4e2c8debd6c52ce94bf12021-11-21T12:11:10ZMethodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews10.1186/s12889-021-12174-w1471-2458https://doaj.org/article/770617a8816b4e2c8debd6c52ce94bf12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12174-whttps://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458Abstract Background We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of methodological challenges in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion (DPHP)-measures. Methods We conducted an overview of reviews searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Database of Promoting Health Effectiveness Reviews, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Promoting Health Effectiveness Reviews (DOPHER) (from their inception to October 2021). We included both systematic and scoping reviews of economic evaluations in DPHP addressing following methodological aspects: (i) attribution of effects, (ii) outcomes, (iii) inter-sectoral (accruing to non-health sectors of society) costs and consequences and (iv) equity. Data were extracted according to the associated sub-criteria of the four methodological aspects including study design economic evaluation (e.g. model-based), type/scope of the outcomes (e.g. outcomes beyond health), perspective, cost categories related to non-health sectors of society, and consideration of equity (method of inclusion). Two reviewers independently screened all citations, full-text articles, and extracted data. A narrative synthesis without a meta-analysis or other statistical synthesis methods was conducted. Results The reviewing process resulted in ten systematic and one scoping review summarizing 494 health economic evaluations. A lifelong time horizon was adopted in about 23% of DPHP evaluations, while 64% of trial-based evaluations had a time horizon up to 2 years. Preference-based outcomes (36%) and non-health outcomes (8%) were only applied in a minority of studies. Although the inclusion of inter-sectoral costs (i.e. costs accruing to non-health sectors of society) has increased in recent years, these were often neglected (between 6 and 23% depending on the cost category). Consideration to equity was barely given in economic evaluations, and only addressed in six of the eleven reviews. Conclusions Economic evaluations of DPHP measures give only little attention to the specific methodological challenges related to this area. For future economic DPHP evaluations a tool with structured guidance should be developed. This overview of reviews was not registered and a published protocol does not exist.Yana SeleznovaAdrienne AlayliStephanie StockDirk MüllerBMCarticleDisease preventionHealth promotionEconomic evaluationMethodsSystematic reviewHealth economicsPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENBMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Disease prevention
Health promotion
Economic evaluation
Methods
Systematic review
Health economics
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Disease prevention
Health promotion
Economic evaluation
Methods
Systematic review
Health economics
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Yana Seleznova
Adrienne Alayli
Stephanie Stock
Dirk Müller
Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
description Abstract Background We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of methodological challenges in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion (DPHP)-measures. Methods We conducted an overview of reviews searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Database of Promoting Health Effectiveness Reviews, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Promoting Health Effectiveness Reviews (DOPHER) (from their inception to October 2021). We included both systematic and scoping reviews of economic evaluations in DPHP addressing following methodological aspects: (i) attribution of effects, (ii) outcomes, (iii) inter-sectoral (accruing to non-health sectors of society) costs and consequences and (iv) equity. Data were extracted according to the associated sub-criteria of the four methodological aspects including study design economic evaluation (e.g. model-based), type/scope of the outcomes (e.g. outcomes beyond health), perspective, cost categories related to non-health sectors of society, and consideration of equity (method of inclusion). Two reviewers independently screened all citations, full-text articles, and extracted data. A narrative synthesis without a meta-analysis or other statistical synthesis methods was conducted. Results The reviewing process resulted in ten systematic and one scoping review summarizing 494 health economic evaluations. A lifelong time horizon was adopted in about 23% of DPHP evaluations, while 64% of trial-based evaluations had a time horizon up to 2 years. Preference-based outcomes (36%) and non-health outcomes (8%) were only applied in a minority of studies. Although the inclusion of inter-sectoral costs (i.e. costs accruing to non-health sectors of society) has increased in recent years, these were often neglected (between 6 and 23% depending on the cost category). Consideration to equity was barely given in economic evaluations, and only addressed in six of the eleven reviews. Conclusions Economic evaluations of DPHP measures give only little attention to the specific methodological challenges related to this area. For future economic DPHP evaluations a tool with structured guidance should be developed. This overview of reviews was not registered and a published protocol does not exist.
format article
author Yana Seleznova
Adrienne Alayli
Stephanie Stock
Dirk Müller
author_facet Yana Seleznova
Adrienne Alayli
Stephanie Stock
Dirk Müller
author_sort Yana Seleznova
title Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
title_short Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
title_full Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
title_fullStr Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
title_full_unstemmed Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
title_sort methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/770617a8816b4e2c8debd6c52ce94bf1
work_keys_str_mv AT yanaseleznova methodologicalissuesineconomicevaluationsofdiseasepreventionandhealthpromotionanoverviewofsystematicandscopingreviews
AT adriennealayli methodologicalissuesineconomicevaluationsofdiseasepreventionandhealthpromotionanoverviewofsystematicandscopingreviews
AT stephaniestock methodologicalissuesineconomicevaluationsofdiseasepreventionandhealthpromotionanoverviewofsystematicandscopingreviews
AT dirkmuller methodologicalissuesineconomicevaluationsofdiseasepreventionandhealthpromotionanoverviewofsystematicandscopingreviews
_version_ 1718419130976043008