FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models

The relevance of the study is due to the problem of the discrepancy between the constructed media reality and reality. The author sees the reason for this problem in the fact that media content producers exploit the synonymous use of the words “fact” and “media fact”. The author notes that the studi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	N. A. Prom
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2020
Materias:	fact media fact media discourse model signs of the concept Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7706c82e341742e7afa436391329df08
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7706c82e341742e7afa436391329df08
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7706c82e341742e7afa436391329df082021-12-02T07:58:10ZFACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2020-5-132-145https://doaj.org/article/7706c82e341742e7afa436391329df082020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1501https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The relevance of the study is due to the problem of the discrepancy between the constructed media reality and reality. The author sees the reason for this problem in the fact that media content producers exploit the synonymous use of the words “fact” and “media fact”. The author notes that the studies conducted earlier do not allow to clearly demonstrate the inequivalence of these concepts, therefore, indicates the need to apply the modeling method to solve this issue. It is proposed to build and then compare the conceptual models of the FACT and MEDIAFACT, taking into account the figuratively perceptual, conceptual and value sides of the concept. Attention is paid to the need to take into account the categories of absoluteness, relativity, ambivalence. The results of a comparative analysis of the learned models are presented. The importance of the media factor in the formation of the conceptual signs of MEDIAFACT is emphasized. The differentiating features of FACT (truth) and MEDIAFACT (pertinence) on the value side of the models are revealed. It is shown that the nuclear conceptual signs of the FACT (reliability and objectivity) were preserved in the conceptual model of MEDIAFACT, but moved from the absolute category to the ambivalent one. It is concluded that a comparative analysis of conceptual models made it possible to compare similar concepts of “fact” and “media fact” and demonstrate their inequivalence.N. A. PromTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlefactmedia factmedia discoursemodelsigns of the conceptSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 5, Pp 132-145 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	fact media fact media discourse model signs of the concept Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	fact media fact media discourse model signs of the concept Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 N. A. Prom FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models
description	The relevance of the study is due to the problem of the discrepancy between the constructed media reality and reality. The author sees the reason for this problem in the fact that media content producers exploit the synonymous use of the words “fact” and “media fact”. The author notes that the studies conducted earlier do not allow to clearly demonstrate the inequivalence of these concepts, therefore, indicates the need to apply the modeling method to solve this issue. It is proposed to build and then compare the conceptual models of the FACT and MEDIAFACT, taking into account the figuratively perceptual, conceptual and value sides of the concept. Attention is paid to the need to take into account the categories of absoluteness, relativity, ambivalence. The results of a comparative analysis of the learned models are presented. The importance of the media factor in the formation of the conceptual signs of MEDIAFACT is emphasized. The differentiating features of FACT (truth) and MEDIAFACT (pertinence) on the value side of the models are revealed. It is shown that the nuclear conceptual signs of the FACT (reliability and objectivity) were preserved in the conceptual model of MEDIAFACT, but moved from the absolute category to the ambivalent one. It is concluded that a comparative analysis of conceptual models made it possible to compare similar concepts of “fact” and “media fact” and demonstrate their inequivalence.
format	article
author	N. A. Prom
author_facet	N. A. Prom
author_sort	N. A. Prom
title	FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models
title_short	FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models
title_full	FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models
title_fullStr	FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models
title_full_unstemmed	FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models
title_sort	fact vs. mediafact: a comparative analysis of conceptual models
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/7706c82e341742e7afa436391329df08
work_keys_str_mv	AT naprom factvsmediafactacomparativeanalysisofconceptualmodels
_version_	1718398856193900544

FACT vs. MEDIAFACT: a Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Models

Ejemplares similares