Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation

There is currently limited evidence on parents’ and early childhood educators’ perspectives on implementing programs that combine cognitive and motor tasks in early childhood. An online survey was distributed across Australia through social network platforms and emails at preschool centres, asking 6...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myrto F. Mavilidi, Sue Bennett, Fred Paas, Anthony D. Okely, Spyridoula Vazou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7709990986ad4d14bc491b417a821957
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7709990986ad4d14bc491b417a821957
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7709990986ad4d14bc491b417a8219572021-11-25T17:49:26ZParents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation10.3390/ijerph1822119131660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/7709990986ad4d14bc491b417a8219572021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11913https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601There is currently limited evidence on parents’ and early childhood educators’ perspectives on implementing programs that combine cognitive and motor tasks in early childhood. An online survey was distributed across Australia through social network platforms and emails at preschool centres, asking 65 parents of preschool children and early childhood educators about their preferences on program delivery, duration, and mode. Responses from the survey were evaluated in order to develop and pilot a 4 week home-based (<i>n</i> = 5 parents) and a 6 week school-based program (<i>n</i> = 5 educators) including cognitively engaging physical activity, requesting parents’ and educators’ perspectives, respectively, about the program components. Results from the online survey showed a preference for programs with online (e.g., video-based) compared to traditional delivery (e.g., books), emphasising the potential benefits on children’s physical activity levels, sleep, and cognitive function. However, after piloting the program, educators preferred to use the book version instead of the video. This program has the potential to become part of daily regular practice. Barriers reported include logistics issues (i.e., book size), connectivity issues with internet, and the need for varying activities.Myrto F. MavilidiSue BennettFred PaasAnthony D. OkelySpyridoula VazouMDPI AGarticlevideo-based programsdeliveryphysical activitypreschool childrenMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11913, p 11913 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic video-based programs
delivery
physical activity
preschool children
Medicine
R
spellingShingle video-based programs
delivery
physical activity
preschool children
Medicine
R
Myrto F. Mavilidi
Sue Bennett
Fred Paas
Anthony D. Okely
Spyridoula Vazou
Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation
description There is currently limited evidence on parents’ and early childhood educators’ perspectives on implementing programs that combine cognitive and motor tasks in early childhood. An online survey was distributed across Australia through social network platforms and emails at preschool centres, asking 65 parents of preschool children and early childhood educators about their preferences on program delivery, duration, and mode. Responses from the survey were evaluated in order to develop and pilot a 4 week home-based (<i>n</i> = 5 parents) and a 6 week school-based program (<i>n</i> = 5 educators) including cognitively engaging physical activity, requesting parents’ and educators’ perspectives, respectively, about the program components. Results from the online survey showed a preference for programs with online (e.g., video-based) compared to traditional delivery (e.g., books), emphasising the potential benefits on children’s physical activity levels, sleep, and cognitive function. However, after piloting the program, educators preferred to use the book version instead of the video. This program has the potential to become part of daily regular practice. Barriers reported include logistics issues (i.e., book size), connectivity issues with internet, and the need for varying activities.
format article
author Myrto F. Mavilidi
Sue Bennett
Fred Paas
Anthony D. Okely
Spyridoula Vazou
author_facet Myrto F. Mavilidi
Sue Bennett
Fred Paas
Anthony D. Okely
Spyridoula Vazou
author_sort Myrto F. Mavilidi
title Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation
title_short Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation
title_full Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation
title_fullStr Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Movement and Learning Program Implementation
title_sort parents’ and early childhood educators’ perceptions on movement and learning program implementation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7709990986ad4d14bc491b417a821957
work_keys_str_mv AT myrtofmavilidi parentsandearlychildhoodeducatorsperceptionsonmovementandlearningprogramimplementation
AT suebennett parentsandearlychildhoodeducatorsperceptionsonmovementandlearningprogramimplementation
AT fredpaas parentsandearlychildhoodeducatorsperceptionsonmovementandlearningprogramimplementation
AT anthonydokely parentsandearlychildhoodeducatorsperceptionsonmovementandlearningprogramimplementation
AT spyridoulavazou parentsandearlychildhoodeducatorsperceptionsonmovementandlearningprogramimplementation
_version_ 1718411993624346624