Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development
Why do similar economic and political institutions function differently in various cultures? Do cultural traits, differences in individualism versus collectivism, have a causal impact on economic behavior and development? This article presents a recent survey of the literature on the relationship be...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Voprosy Ekonomiki
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7713f2f91b4841ac897e757ff7713404 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7713f2f91b4841ac897e757ff7713404 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7713f2f91b4841ac897e757ff77134042021-12-05T04:30:56ZAnalysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development10.32609/j.ruje.7.578942405-4739https://doaj.org/article/7713f2f91b4841ac897e757ff77134042021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://rujec.org/article/57894/download/pdf/https://rujec.org/article/57894/download/xml/https://rujec.org/article/57894/https://doaj.org/toc/2405-4739Why do similar economic and political institutions function differently in various cultures? Do cultural traits, differences in individualism versus collectivism, have a causal impact on economic behavior and development? This article presents a recent survey of the literature on the relationship between culture, institutions, and economic growth. On the one hand, part of the literature indicates that there is a one-way causality from culture to institutions and economic performance. On the other hand, there is an extensive literature that has established causality from institutions to economic growth and culture. However, a growing body of empirical research demonstrates that culture and institutions interact in two ways and complement each other affecting long-term growth. Research documents cultural variables affecting a great deal of economic activity and institutions across the world. Recent dominant discourse on the role of the individualism-collectivism cleavage in the determination of the wealth of nations has attempted to examine the positive effects of individualism rather than collectivism. This paper shows that the advantages of collectivism have been rarely researched within economic literature. Taking into account collectivism can shed light on various puzzles in economics, such as solving collective action problems.Necati BerkVoprosy EkonomikiarticleEconomics as a scienceHB71-74ENRussian Journal of Economics, Vol 7, Iss 3, Pp 185-199 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Economics as a science HB71-74 |
spellingShingle |
Economics as a science HB71-74 Necati Berk Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development |
description |
Why do similar economic and political institutions function differently in various cultures? Do cultural traits, differences in individualism versus collectivism, have a causal impact on economic behavior and development? This article presents a recent survey of the literature on the relationship between culture, institutions, and economic growth. On the one hand, part of the literature indicates that there is a one-way causality from culture to institutions and economic performance. On the other hand, there is an extensive literature that has established causality from institutions to economic growth and culture. However, a growing body of empirical research demonstrates that culture and institutions interact in two ways and complement each other affecting long-term growth. Research documents cultural variables affecting a great deal of economic activity and institutions across the world. Recent dominant discourse on the role of the individualism-collectivism cleavage in the determination of the wealth of nations has attempted to examine the positive effects of individualism rather than collectivism. This paper shows that the advantages of collectivism have been rarely researched within economic literature. Taking into account collectivism can shed light on various puzzles in economics, such as solving collective action problems. |
format |
article |
author |
Necati Berk |
author_facet |
Necati Berk |
author_sort |
Necati Berk |
title |
Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development |
title_short |
Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development |
title_full |
Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: Institutions, culture, and economic development |
title_sort |
analysis of the role of collectivism in light of the recent literature on the big triangle: institutions, culture, and economic development |
publisher |
Voprosy Ekonomiki |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7713f2f91b4841ac897e757ff7713404 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT necatiberk analysisoftheroleofcollectivisminlightoftherecentliteratureonthebigtriangleinstitutionscultureandeconomicdevelopment |
_version_ |
1718372620967084032 |