Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study

Background: Surgical difficulty assessment in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is a constant challenge for oral surgeons. Aim: The first aim was to apply Maglione's new classification on patients that needed surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, and the seco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sally Awad, Sara M. ElKhateeb
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7734b106ab724a39ac69ccf3023ec4b4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7734b106ab724a39ac69ccf3023ec4b4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7734b106ab724a39ac69ccf3023ec4b42021-11-10T04:19:12ZPrediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study1013-905210.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.001https://doaj.org/article/7734b106ab724a39ac69ccf3023ec4b42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905220307483https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052Background: Surgical difficulty assessment in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is a constant challenge for oral surgeons. Aim: The first aim was to apply Maglione's new classification on patients that needed surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, and the second aim was to study the correlation of the classification classes with the occurrence of postoperative neurosensory disorders. Materials & methods: The present prospective clinical trial pilot study was conducted on patients attending oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics from February 2017 until January 2018 for the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Results: Fifty-one out of sixty-nine patients made the surgical removal of one impacted mandibular third molar. The most common subclass was 1B (24.6%), followed by subclass 3B (23.2%). Subclass 3A and 4B showed an equal distribution of (11.6%) each, and then subclass 2B (10%). The most significant subclass was 4B with (5.9%) neurosensory disturbance. None of the patients had a permanent disturbance. Conclusion: Maglione's classification offers unique detailed description of the buccolingual relationship of MTM with IAC that could be used as a future reliable radiographic guide to reduce the risk of post-operative neurosensory disturbances after MTM surgical removal.Sally AwadSara M. ElKhateebElsevierarticleNeurosensory deficitThird molar surgeryCone beam CTMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENSaudi Dental Journal, Vol 33, Iss 7, Pp 601-607 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosensory deficit
Third molar surgery
Cone beam CT
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle Neurosensory deficit
Third molar surgery
Cone beam CT
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
Sally Awad
Sara M. ElKhateeb
Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study
description Background: Surgical difficulty assessment in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is a constant challenge for oral surgeons. Aim: The first aim was to apply Maglione's new classification on patients that needed surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, and the second aim was to study the correlation of the classification classes with the occurrence of postoperative neurosensory disorders. Materials & methods: The present prospective clinical trial pilot study was conducted on patients attending oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics from February 2017 until January 2018 for the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Results: Fifty-one out of sixty-nine patients made the surgical removal of one impacted mandibular third molar. The most common subclass was 1B (24.6%), followed by subclass 3B (23.2%). Subclass 3A and 4B showed an equal distribution of (11.6%) each, and then subclass 2B (10%). The most significant subclass was 4B with (5.9%) neurosensory disturbance. None of the patients had a permanent disturbance. Conclusion: Maglione's classification offers unique detailed description of the buccolingual relationship of MTM with IAC that could be used as a future reliable radiographic guide to reduce the risk of post-operative neurosensory disturbances after MTM surgical removal.
format article
author Sally Awad
Sara M. ElKhateeb
author_facet Sally Awad
Sara M. ElKhateeb
author_sort Sally Awad
title Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study
title_short Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study
title_full Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study
title_fullStr Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione’s classification: A pilot study
title_sort prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam ct maglione’s classification: a pilot study
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7734b106ab724a39ac69ccf3023ec4b4
work_keys_str_mv AT sallyawad predictionofneurosensorydisordersafterimpactedthirdmolarextractionbasedonconebeamctmaglionesclassificationapilotstudy
AT saramelkhateeb predictionofneurosensorydisordersafterimpactedthirdmolarextractionbasedonconebeamctmaglionesclassificationapilotstudy
_version_ 1718440663539777536