Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank

Leena Bajracharya, 1 Sachit Kumar Bhandari, 2 Shankha Narayan Twyana 3 1Department of Cornea, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, Nepal; 2Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, Nepal; 3Nepal Eye Bank, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajracharya L, Bhandari SK, Twyana SN
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7742003315c94110b3b833a85b017503
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7742003315c94110b3b833a85b017503
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7742003315c94110b3b833a85b0175032021-12-02T04:37:48ZDonor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/7742003315c94110b3b833a85b0175032020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/donor-profile-tissue-evaluation-and-comparison-of-voluntary-and-motiva-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Leena Bajracharya, 1 Sachit Kumar Bhandari, 2 Shankha Narayan Twyana 3 1Department of Cornea, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, Nepal; 2Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, Nepal; 3Nepal Eye Bank, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, NepalCorrespondence: Leena BajracharyaTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Gaushala, Bagmati Bridge, P. O. Box # 561, Kathmandu, Province No.3, NepalTel +977 1 4493775Fax +977- 1- 4474937Email lbajra@yahoo.comPurpose: Corneal problems is one of the major causes of blindness in developing countries like Nepal. This study intended to analyze donor and tissue profile of Nepal Eye Bank (NEB).Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive type study. Data of corneal tissues collected by NEB from January 2015 to December 2016 were used in the study. Data collected were demographic profile, cause of death, type of corneal donation (whether voluntary or motivated), quality and utilization of tissues. A comparison was made between voluntary and motivated donors.Results: 1244 corneal tissues were retrieved from 639 donors. Mean age of donors was 49.4 years. 57.7% of the donors were male. There were almost equal number of donor deaths due to cardiovascular disease, 27.2%, and respiratory disease, 26.7%, followed by hanging, 17.8%. Majority of donors were motivated (n = 561, 87.7%). Mean death to preservation time was 5.79 hours (hrs). Of the harvested corneas, 1040 (83.6.%) were suitable for transplant with a mean endothelial cell count of 2850 ± 520 cells/mm 2; 16.4% were of poor tissue quality and 2.7% were seropositive. 76.2% of total tissues were of optical quality. Utilization rate of transplantable tissues was 97%. Tissues from motivated donors were significantly “younger” (p=0.0001), had better endothelial count (p=0.0001), and were of better quality (p=0.026) than those from voluntary donors.Conclusion: Motivated eye donation is a major and effective source of cornea collection in the eye bank under study with “younger” and better quality corneas compared to voluntary donors.Keywords: eye donation counselor, hospital corneal retrieval program, HCRP, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, SightLifeBajracharya LBhandari SKTwyana SNDove Medical Pressarticleeye donation counsellor (edc)hospital corneal retrieval program (hcrp)tilganga institute of ophthalmology (tio)sightlifeOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 95-101 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic eye donation counsellor (edc)
hospital corneal retrieval program (hcrp)
tilganga institute of ophthalmology (tio)
sightlife
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle eye donation counsellor (edc)
hospital corneal retrieval program (hcrp)
tilganga institute of ophthalmology (tio)
sightlife
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Bajracharya L
Bhandari SK
Twyana SN
Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank
description Leena Bajracharya, 1 Sachit Kumar Bhandari, 2 Shankha Narayan Twyana 3 1Department of Cornea, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, Nepal; 2Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, Nepal; 3Nepal Eye Bank, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Province No. 3, NepalCorrespondence: Leena BajracharyaTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Gaushala, Bagmati Bridge, P. O. Box # 561, Kathmandu, Province No.3, NepalTel +977 1 4493775Fax +977- 1- 4474937Email lbajra@yahoo.comPurpose: Corneal problems is one of the major causes of blindness in developing countries like Nepal. This study intended to analyze donor and tissue profile of Nepal Eye Bank (NEB).Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive type study. Data of corneal tissues collected by NEB from January 2015 to December 2016 were used in the study. Data collected were demographic profile, cause of death, type of corneal donation (whether voluntary or motivated), quality and utilization of tissues. A comparison was made between voluntary and motivated donors.Results: 1244 corneal tissues were retrieved from 639 donors. Mean age of donors was 49.4 years. 57.7% of the donors were male. There were almost equal number of donor deaths due to cardiovascular disease, 27.2%, and respiratory disease, 26.7%, followed by hanging, 17.8%. Majority of donors were motivated (n = 561, 87.7%). Mean death to preservation time was 5.79 hours (hrs). Of the harvested corneas, 1040 (83.6.%) were suitable for transplant with a mean endothelial cell count of 2850 ± 520 cells/mm 2; 16.4% were of poor tissue quality and 2.7% were seropositive. 76.2% of total tissues were of optical quality. Utilization rate of transplantable tissues was 97%. Tissues from motivated donors were significantly “younger” (p=0.0001), had better endothelial count (p=0.0001), and were of better quality (p=0.026) than those from voluntary donors.Conclusion: Motivated eye donation is a major and effective source of cornea collection in the eye bank under study with “younger” and better quality corneas compared to voluntary donors.Keywords: eye donation counselor, hospital corneal retrieval program, HCRP, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, SightLife
format article
author Bajracharya L
Bhandari SK
Twyana SN
author_facet Bajracharya L
Bhandari SK
Twyana SN
author_sort Bajracharya L
title Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank
title_short Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank
title_full Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank
title_fullStr Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank
title_full_unstemmed Donor Profile, Tissue Evaluation and Comparison of Voluntary and Motivated Corneal Donation in Nepal Eye Bank
title_sort donor profile, tissue evaluation and comparison of voluntary and motivated corneal donation in nepal eye bank
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/7742003315c94110b3b833a85b017503
work_keys_str_mv AT bajracharyal donorprofiletissueevaluationandcomparisonofvoluntaryandmotivatedcornealdonationinnepaleyebank
AT bhandarisk donorprofiletissueevaluationandcomparisonofvoluntaryandmotivatedcornealdonationinnepaleyebank
AT twyanasn donorprofiletissueevaluationandcomparisonofvoluntaryandmotivatedcornealdonationinnepaleyebank
_version_ 1718401128246280192